Comparative growth rates and yields of ciliates and heterotrophic dinoflagellates

被引:91
作者
Strom, SL [1 ]
Morello, TA [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Washington Univ, Shannon Point Marine Ctr, Anacortes, WA 98221 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1093/plankt/20.3.571
中图分类号
Q17 [水生生物学];
学科分类号
071004 ;
摘要
Growth rates, ingestion rates and grazer yields (grazer volume produced/prey volume consumed) were measured for six protozoan species (ciliates: Favella sp., Strombidinopsis acuminatum, Uronema sp.; heterotrophic dinoflagellates: Amphidinium sp., Gymnodinium sp., Noctiluca scintillans) in laboratory batch culture experiments. Comparative growth data indicate that the prymnesiophyte Isochrysis galbana, the prasinophyte Mantoniella squamata, two cryptophyte species and several autotrophic dinoflagellate species were suitable foods for these grazers. When grown on optimized diets at 13 degrees C, maximum ciliate growth rates (range 0.77-1.01 day(-1)) uniformly exceeded maximum heterotrophic dinoflagellate growth rates (range 0.41-0.48 day(-1)). A compilation of published data demonstrates that this growth rate difference persists across a range of ciliate and dinoflagellate taxa and cell sizes. Comparison of volume-specific ingestion rates and yields for the six species studied here showed that there was no single explanation for this growth rate disparity. Heterotrophic dinoflagellates exhibited both low ingestion rates and, in one case, low yields; ciliates were able to achieve higher growth rates via either higher ingestion rates or higher yields, depending on ciliate species. Volume yield increased over time throughout the exponential growth phase in nearly all experiments, suggesting variation in response to changing food concentrations or long-term acclimation to culture conditions. Higher maximum ciliate growth rates mean that these grazers have the potential to exercise tighter control over incipient blooms of their prey than do heterotrophic dinoflagellates.
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 584
页数:14
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [11] EFFECTS OF SIZE AND CONCENTRATION OF FOOD PARTICLES ON FEEDING BEHAVIOR OF MARINE PLANKTONIC COPEPOD CALANUS-PACIFICUS[J]. FROST, BW. LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 1972(06)
  • [12] Garrison D.L., 1991, Journal of Marine Systems, V2, P317, DOI 10.1016/0924-7963(91)90039-W
  • [13] LABORATORY CULTURE OF MARINE PLANKTONIC OLIGOTRICHS (CILIOPHORA, OLIGOTRICHIDA)[J]. GIFFORD, DJ. MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 1985(03)
  • [14] DYNAMICS OF HERBIVOROUS GRAZING BY THE HETEROTROPHIC DINOFLAGELLATE OXYRRHIS-MARINA[J]. GOLDMAN, JC;DENNETT, MR;GORDIN, H. JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH, 1989(02)
  • [15] GROVER JP, 1990, ARCH HYDROBIOL, V119, P197
  • [16] STUDIES OF MARINE PLANKTONIC DIATOMS .1. CYCLOTELLA NANA HUSTEDT, AND DETONULA CONFERVACEA (CLEVE) GRAN[J]. GUILLARD, RR;RYTHER, JH. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 1962(02)
  • [17] HAMILTON R D, 1970, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, V5, P94, DOI 10.1016/0022-0981(70)90032-8
  • [18] PREY SIZE SELECTION, FEEDING RATES AND GROWTH DYNAMICS OF HETEROTROPHIC DINOFLAGELLATES WITH SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON GYRODINIUM-SPIRALE[J]. HANSEN, PJ. MARINE BIOLOGY, 1992(02)
  • [19] STUDIES ON FUNCTIONAL ROLE OF TINTINNIDS IN SOUTHERN-CALIFORNIA BIGHT .1. GRAZING AND GROWTH-RATES IN LABORATORY CULTURES[J]. HEINBOKEL, JF. MARINE BIOLOGY, 1978(02)
  • [20] THECATE HETEROTROPHIC DINOFLAGELLATES - FEEDING-BEHAVIOR AND MECHANISMS[J]. JACOBSON, DM;ANDERSON, DM. JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY, 1986(03)