Park characteristics, use, and physical activity: A review of studies using SOPARC (System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities)

被引:155
作者
Evenson, Kelly R. [1 ]
Jones, Sydney A. [1 ]
Holliday, Katelyn M. [1 ]
Cohen, Deborah A. [2 ]
McKenzie, Thomas L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, 137 East Franklin St,Suite 306, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 USA
[2] RAND Corp, 1776 Main St, Santa Monica, CA 90407 USA
[3] San Diego State Univ, Sch Exercise & Nutrit Sci, 5127 Walsh Way, San Diego, CA 92115 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Observation; Park and recreation; Physical activity; Sedentary behavior; Surveillance; NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS; DESCRIPTIVE EXAMINATION; ENERGY-EXPENDITURE; PUBLIC PARKS; ASSOCIATIONS; VISITATION; WALKING; FEATURES; CITIES; SPACES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.02.029
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC) can obtain information on park users and their physical activity using momentary time sampling. We conducted a literature review of studies using the SOPARC tool to describe the observational methods of each study, and to extract public park use overall and by demographics and physical activity levels. We searched PubMed, Embase, and SPORTDiscus for full-length observational studies published in English in peer-reviewed journals through 2014. Twenty-four studies from 34 articles were included. The number of parks observed per study ranged from 3 to 50. Most studies observed parks during one season. The number of days parks were observed ranged from 1 to 16, with 16 studies observing 5 or more days. All studies included at least one weekday and all but two included at least one weekend day. Parks were observed from 1 to 14 times/day, with most studies observing at least 4 times/day. All studies included both morning and afternoon observations, with one exception. There was a wide range of park users (mean 1.0 to 152.6 people/park/observation period), with typically more males than females visiting parks and older adults less than other age groups. Park user physical activity levels varied greatly across studies, with youths generally more active than adults and younger children more active than adolescents. SOPARC was adapted to numerous settings and these review results can be used to improve future studies using the tool, demonstrate ways to compare park data, and inform park promotions and programming. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 166
页数:14
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], ALR SYSTEMATIC OBSER
  • [2] [Anonymous], ISOPARC IPAD
  • [3] [Anonymous], BENEFITS PHYS ACTIVI
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, SHIELD RES J PHYS ED
  • [5] [Anonymous], TOOLS MEAS
  • [6] [Anonymous], SOPARC ONLINE APP US
  • [7] Aytur S.A., 2015, Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, V9, P1
  • [8] The Associations Between Park Environments and Park Use in Southern US Communities
    Banda, Jorge A.
    Wilcox, Sara
    Colabianchi, Natalie
    Hooker, Steven P.
    Kaczynski, Andrew T.
    Hussey, James
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2014, 30 (04) : 369 - 378
  • [9] Park Use Among Youth and Adults: Examination of Individual, Social, and Urban Form Factors
    Baran, Perver K.
    Smith, William R.
    Moore, Robin C.
    Floyd, Myron F.
    Bocarro, Jason N.
    Cosco, Nilda G.
    Danninger, Thomas M.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2014, 46 (06) : 768 - 800
  • [10] Demographic variations in observed energy expenditure across park activity areas
    Besenyi, Gina M.
    Kaczynski, Andrew T.
    Stanis, Sonja A. Wilhelm
    Vaughan, Katherine B.
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 56 (01) : 79 - 81