Acceptable Post-Heart Transplant Outcomes Support Temporary MCS Prioritization in the New OPTN|UNOS Heart Allocation Policy

被引:19
作者
Reich, Heidi [1 ]
Ramzy, Danny [1 ]
Moriguchi, Jaime [1 ]
Dimbil, Sadia [1 ]
Levine, Ryan [1 ]
Passano, Elizabeth [1 ]
Kittleson, Michelle [1 ]
Cole, Robert [1 ]
Czer, Lawrence [1 ]
Chang, David [1 ]
Geft, Dael [1 ]
Trento, Alfredo [1 ]
Chikwe, Joanna [1 ]
Kobashigawa, Jon [1 ]
Esmailian, Fardad [1 ]
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Heart Inst, Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
关键词
REGISTRY; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.04.1819
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices are generally used short term to maintain adequate organ perfusion in patients with advanced heart failure and cardiogenic shock. Unacceptably high waitlist mortality in this cohort motivated changes to heart allocation policy, which recognized the severity of illness by prioritization for temporary MCS and broader sharing in the new U.S. donor heart allocation policy. We evaluated the post-heart transplant outcomes for patients bridged with temporary MCS, a control population not bridged with MCS, and a cohort bridged with durable MCS. Methods. The heart transplant research database was queried to identify patients bridged with temporary MCS and bridged with durable MCS who went directly to heart transplant in our center. Temporary MCS included Impella, intra-aortic balloon pump, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Post-transplant endpoints were assessed at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year. Results. From 2010 to 2017, a total of 23 patients were bridged to heart transplant with temporary MCS and 548 were transplanted without MCS bridge. Patients bridged with temporary MCS had younger age, lower body mass index, and higher frequencies of prior blood transfusion and Status 1 (1A/1B) listing at transplant compared to patients not bridged with MCS (all P <.001). Despite the severity of illness in patients bridged with temporary MCS, post-transplant outcomes were indistinguishable from those in patients transplanted without MCS bridge, with no difference in 30-day, 6-month, or 1-year survival or 1-year freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy, nonfatal major adverse cardiac events, anytreated rejection, acute cellular rejection, or antibody-mediated rejection (P = .23-.97). Similarly, compared to 157 patients bridged with durable MCS, no differences in post-transplant outcomes were identified for the temporary MCS cohort (P = .15-.94). Conclusion. Temporary MCS as a bridge to transplant achieves similar post-transplant outcomes at 1 year compared to no MCS and durable MCS. These encouraging findings support recent changes in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network vertical bar United Network Organ Sharing (OPTN vertical bar UNOS) adult heart allocation policy.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 357
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Trends in the Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Patients Presenting With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction [J].
Agarwal, Shikhar ;
Sud, Karan ;
Martin, Joseph M. ;
Menon, Venu .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 8 (13) :1772-1774
[2]   Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a direct bridge to heart transplantation in adults [J].
Fukuhara, Shinichi ;
Takeda, Koji ;
Kurlansky, Paul A. ;
Naka, Yoshifumi ;
Takayama, Hiroo .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 155 (04) :1607-+
[3]   Mechanical Circulatory Support Pathways That Maximize Post-Heart Transplant Survival [J].
Karamlou, Tara ;
Gelow, Jill ;
Diggs, Brian S. ;
Tibayan, Frederick A. ;
Mudd, James M. ;
Guyton, Steven W. ;
Slater, Matthew S. ;
Song, Howard K. .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 95 (02) :480-485
[4]   Variability in Donor Heart Acceptance Across the United States [J].
Khush, K. ;
Ball, R. .
JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 37 (04) :S341-S341
[5]   The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs Database Annual Report: Evolving Indications, Outcomes, and Scientific Partnerships [J].
Kormos, Robert L. ;
Cowger, Jennifer ;
Pagani, Francis D. ;
Teuteberg, Jeffrey J. ;
Goldstein, Daniel J. ;
Jacobs, Jeffrey P. ;
Higgins, Robert S. ;
Stevenson, Lynne W. ;
Stehlik, Josef ;
Atluri, Pavan ;
Grady, Kathleen L. ;
Kirklin, James K. .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2019, 107 (02) :341-353
[6]   The Future Direction of the Adult Heart Allocation System in the United States [J].
Meyer, D. M. ;
Rogers, J. G. ;
Edwards, L. B. ;
Callahan, E. R. ;
Webber, S. A. ;
Johnson, M. R. ;
Vega, J. D. ;
Zucker, M. J. ;
Cleveland, J. C., Jr. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 15 (01) :44-54
[7]  
Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Health Resources and Services Administration, OPTN AD HEART ALL PO
[8]   Incidence of temporary mechanical circulatory support before heart transplantation and impact on post-transplant outcomes [J].
Ouyang, David ;
Gulati, Gunsagar ;
Ha, Richard ;
Banerjee, Dipanjan .
JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 37 (09) :1060-1066
[9]  
Rihal CS, 2015, J AM COLL CARDIOL
[10]   Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery [J].
Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra ;
Arora, Shilpkumar ;
Lahewala, Sopan ;
Kumar, Varun ;
Shantha, Ghanshyam P. S. ;
Jentzer, Jacob C. ;
Stulak, John M. ;
Gersh, Bernard J. ;
Gulati, Rajiv ;
Rihal, Charanjit S. ;
Prasad, Abhiram ;
Deshmukh, Abhishek J. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2018, 7 (22)