Interregional inventor collaboration and the commercial value of patented inventions: evidence from the US biotechnology industry

被引:8
|
作者
Sonmez, Zafer [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Coll Urban Planning & Publ Affairs, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
关键词
RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; KNOWLEDGE NETWORKS; GEOGRAPHICAL PROXIMITY; INNOVATION; CITATIONS; PERFORMANCE; QUALITY; TECHNOLOGY; SPILLOVERS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s00168-018-0874-5
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper analyzes the relative importance of the spatiality of inventor collaboration links for the quality of invention. It uses patent citation and renewal data to estimate (expected) economic values for a sample of US biotechnology patents, controlling for a set of inventor and owner characteristics. The investigation extends the research by differentiating the quality of knowledge flows while at the same time refining patents as a source of innovation information. The results of the clustered logistic regression and continuation ratio models provide some support for the hypothesis that interregional (non-local) collaboration results in commercially more valuable inventions relative to patents that are product of intraregional (local) collaboration. The same empirical results also indicate that (1) inter-industry (related) knowledge flows contribute to the patent value more than inter-industry (unrelated) or intra-industry knowledge flows and (2) general-purpose technologies/products as measured by citations of patented inventions received from diverse sets of industries are indicative not only of technological/scientific quality, but also of the economic value of patented inventions. These results are robust in different citation-window designations, exclusion of self-citations, different regional definitions and different patent classifications.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 438
页数:40
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Searching for knowledge in response to proximate and remote problem sources: Evidence from the US renewable electricity industry
    Dutt, Nilanjana
    Mitchell, Will
    STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2020, 41 (08) : 1412 - 1449
  • [32] Determinants of cross-regional R&D collaboration: some empirical evidence from Europe in biotechnology
    Hazir, Cilem Selin
    Autant-Bernard, Corinne
    ANNALS OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2014, 53 (02) : 369 - 393
  • [33] Does university-industry collaboration improve firm productivity? Evidence from China
    Li, Yuanqi
    Li, Zhuo
    Liu, Ting
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (07):
  • [34] The Informational Value of Segment Data Disaggregated by Underlying Industry: Evidence from the Textual Features of Business Descriptions
    Song, Shiwon
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2021, 96 (06) : 361 - 396
  • [35] Transition to sustainable development in the tanning industry: Evidence from leather value chain in Tamil Nadu, India
    Paul, Bino
    Shaji, Rahul
    Patnaik, Unmesh
    Pulikkamath, Ashraf
    Ahmed, Irfan
    Ghosh, Soumen
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 31 (04) : 2938 - 2949
  • [36] Industrial Agglomeration, University-Industry Collaboration and Patent Output: Evidence From the Chinese High-Tech Industry
    Sun, Bing
    Zhang, Ruihan
    Mao, Hongying
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 228466 - 228479
  • [37] Homing and platform responses to entry: Historical evidence from the US newspaper industry
    Park, Kyeonggook Francis
    Seamans, Robert
    Zhu, Feng
    STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2021, 42 (04) : 684 - 709
  • [38] Reallocation and Technology: Evidence from the US Steel Industry
    Collard-Wexler, Allan
    De Loecker, Jan
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 105 (01) : 131 - 171
  • [39] Dynamic relationships of knowledge creation activities in supply chains: Evidence from patent data in the US auto industry
    Lin, Yan
    Chen, Jian
    Chen, Yan
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2011, 5 (32): : 12563 - 12576
  • [40] Role of government funding in fostering collaboration between knowledge-based organizations: Evidence from the solar PV industry in China
    Liu, Anita M. M.
    Liang, Otto Xinning
    Tuuli, Martin
    Chan, Isabelle
    ENERGY EXPLORATION & EXPLOITATION, 2018, 36 (03) : 509 - 534