CONTACT-Patient-Centred Care Questionnaire to assess care for patients treated with oral anticancer drugs: Development and psychometric validation

被引:2
作者
Kenis, Ilyse [1 ,2 ]
Janssen, Rianne [3 ]
Wuyts, Stephanie C. M. [4 ,5 ]
Van Hecke, Ann [2 ,6 ]
Foulon, Veerle [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Clin Pharmacol & Pharmacotherapy, Dept Pharmaceut & Pharmacol Sci, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Univ Ctr Nursing & Midwifery, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Ghent, Belgium
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Ctr Educ Effectiveness & Evaluat, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, Leuven, Belgium
[4] Univ Hosp Brussels, Hosp Pharm, Brussels, Belgium
[5] Vrije Univ Brussel, Fac Med & Pharm, Res Grp Clin Pharmacol & Clin Pharm, Brussels, Belgium
[6] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Nursing, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
CONTACT-Patient-Centred Care Questionnaire; oral anticancer drugs; patient-centred care; patient-reported experience measure; quality of care; reliability and validity; REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES; SAMPLE-SIZE; QUALITY; HEALTH; RELIABILITY; INSTRUMENTS;
D O I
10.1111/ecc.13643
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective Instruments to measure quality of patient-centred care (PCC) for the rapidly growing population of patients treated with oral anticancer drugs (OACD) are lacking. The aim of this study was to develop a valid and reliable instrument to assess PCC in the context of OACD. Methods The CONTACT-Patient-Centred Care Questionnaire (CONTACT-PCCQ) was developed based on a validated set of key elements (KEs) for patient-centred education and counselling in patients taking OACD, and face validity was evaluated by means of cognitive interviews. In 16 Belgian hospitals, adult patients treated with OACD were asked to complete the questionnaire. Construct validity was investigated through exploratory factor analyses (EFAs) and internal consistency of the subscales was examined using Cronbach's alpha. Results The initial 86-item instrument was completed by 464 patients. Each EFA confirmed the a priori PCC-based structure of the subscales. However, EFA revealed more than one factor for two of the subscales. Therefore, multiple subsections within these subscales were created. Based on factor loadings and item content, six items were removed. This resulted in a final 80-item instrument with seven subscales and five subsections. Cronbach's alpha for the subscales and subsections ranged between 0.732 and 0.918, which implies adequate internal consistency. Conclusion A final instrument with 80 items divided into seven subscales, covering all six dimensions of PCC, was obtained. The CONTACT-PCCQ has acceptable psychometric properties, supporting its use as a measure to assess care experiences of patients treated with OACD.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Care pathways of cancer patients: Modeling and risks analysis induced by oral anticancer drugs
    Renet, Sophie
    Maritaz, Christophe
    Lotz, Jean-Pierre
    Burnel, Sylvie
    Paubel, Pascal
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2016, 103 (04) : 345 - 352
  • [22] Patients on oral anticancer drugs and coordinated pathway: CHIMORAL, feedback from care providers
    Maritaz, Christophe
    Napoly, Laure
    Burnel, Sylvie
    Lotz, Jean-Pierre
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2020, 107 (12) : 1210 - 1220
  • [23] Development and validation of a French questionnaire concerning patients' perspectives of the quality of palliative care: the QUALI-PALLI-Patient
    Guirimand, Frederic
    Martel-Samb, Patricia
    Guy-Coichard, Christian
    Picard, Stephane
    Devalois, Bernard
    Copel, Laure
    Abel, Anne
    Ghadi, Veronique
    Bouleuc, Carole
    Geoffroy, Louise
    Gineston, Laurence
    Godard, Helene
    Grenet, Xavier
    Nfissi, Karima
    Richard, Jean-Francois
    Rostaing, Sylvie
    Tibi-Levy, Yael
    Vedel, Isabelle
    Vincent, Kate
    Meaude, Layde
    Laot-Cabon, Sylvie
    Gaston-Dreyfus, Sarah
    Angelard, Audrey
    Saidji, Yasmine
    Mesbahi, Karima
    Teng, Wen
    Bruno, Pr
    Aegerter, Philippe
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2019, 18 (1)
  • [24] Development and validation of a French questionnaire concerning patients’ perspectives of the quality of palliative care: the QUALI-PALLI-Patient
    Frédéric Guirimand
    Patricia Martel-Samb
    Christian Guy-Coichard
    Stéphane Picard
    Bernard Devalois
    Laure Copel
    Anne Abel
    Véronique Ghadi
    BMC Palliative Care, 18
  • [25] A questionnaire to assess women's perception of respectful maternity care (WP-RMC): Development and psychometric properties
    Ayoubi, Sedigheh
    Pazandeh, Farzaneh
    Simbar, Masoumeh
    Moridi, Maryam
    Zare, Elham
    Potrata, Barbara
    MIDWIFERY, 2020, 80
  • [26] Putting patients first: development of a patient advocate and general practitioner-informed model of patient-centred care
    Brickley, Bryce
    Williams, Lauren T.
    Morgan, Mark
    Ross, Alyson
    Trigger, Kellie
    Ball, Lauren
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [27] Development and validation of the quality care questionnaire –palliative care (QCQ-PC): patient-reported assessment of quality of palliative care
    Young Ho Yun
    Eun Kyo Kang
    Jihye Lee
    Jiyeon Choo
    Hyewon Ryu
    Hye-min Yun
    Jung Hun Kang
    Tae You Kim
    Jin-Ah Sim
    Yaeji Kim
    BMC Palliative Care, 17
  • [28] Putting patients first: development of a patient advocate and general practitioner-informed model of patient-centred care
    Bryce Brickley
    Lauren T. Williams
    Mark Morgan
    Alyson Ross
    Kellie Trigger
    Lauren Ball
    BMC Health Services Research, 21
  • [29] Reliability and validity of the Hebrew version of the Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire for measuring patients' perceived continuity of care in oral anticancer therapy
    Castel, Orit Cohen
    Dagan, Efrat
    Keinan-Boker, Lital
    Shadmi, Efrat
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2018, 27 (06)
  • [30] Development and validation of a questionnaire for assessing patients′ perceptions of interprofessional integration in health care
    Parra-Vega, Iris
    Marques-Sanchez, Pilar
    Pelayo-Teran, Jose M.
    Corral Gudino, Luis
    JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2022, 36 (04) : 538 - 544