Cerebrovascular Response to Propofol, Fentanyl, and Midazolam in Moderate/Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Systematic Review of the Human and Animal Literature

被引:28
作者
Froese, Logan [1 ]
Dian, Joshua [2 ]
Batson, Carleen [3 ]
Gomez, Alwyn [3 ]
Unger, Bertram [4 ]
Zeiler, Frederick A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Biomed Engn, Fac Engn, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[2] Univ Manitoba, Ctr Aging, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[3] Univ Manitoba, Sect Neurosurg, Dept Surg, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[4] Univ Manitoba, Dept Anat & Cell Sci, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[5] Univ Manitoba, Rady Fac Hlth Sci, Sect Crit Care, Dept Med, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[6] Univ Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hosp, Div Anesthesia, Dept Med, Cambridge, England
来源
NEUROTRAUMA REPORTS | 2020年 / 1卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 加拿大创新基金会; 加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
brain injury; cerebral blood flow; cerebrovascular response; fentanyl; midazolam; propofol; CEREBRAL PERFUSION-PRESSURE; NEUROTRAUMA EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; BLOOD-FLOW; INTRACRANIAL-PRESSURE; HEAD-INJURY; AUTOREGULATION; REACTIVITY; OXYGEN; METABOLISM; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1089/neur.2020.0040
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Intravenous propofol, fentanyl, and midazolam are utilized commonly in critical care for metabolic suppression and anesthesia. The impact of propofol, fentanyl, andmidazolamon cerebrovasculature and cerebral blood flow (CBF) is unclear in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and may carry important implications, as care is shifting to focus on cerebrovascular reactivity monitoring/directed therapies. The aim of this study was to perform a scoping review of the literature on the cerebrovascular/CBF effects of propofol, fentanyl, and midazolam in human patients with moderate/severe TBI and animal models with TBI. A search of MEDLINE, BIOSIS, EMBASE, Global Health, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Library from inception to May 2020 was performed. All articles were included pertaining to the administration of propofol, fentanyl, and midazolam, in which the impact on CBF/cerebral vasculature was recorded. We identified 14 studies: 8 that evaluated propofol, 5 that evaluated fentanyl, and 2 that evaluated midazolam. All studies suffered fromsignificant limitations, including: small sample size, and heterogeneous design and measurement techniques. In general, there was no significant change seen in CBF/cerebrovascular response to administration of propofol, fentanyl, or midazolam during experiments where PCO2 and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were controlled. This review highlights the current knowledge gap surrounding the impact of commonly utilized sedative drugs in TBI care. This work supports the need for dedicated studies, both experimental and human-based, evaluating the impact of these drugs on CBF and cerebrovascular reactivity/response in TBI.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 112
页数:13
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据