Timolol 0.1% gel (Nyogel 0.1%®) once daily versus conventional timolol 0.5% solution twice daily:: A comparison of efficacy and safety

被引:28
作者
Rouland, JF
Morel-Mandrino, P
Elena, PP
Polzer, H
Raj, PS
机构
[1] Novartis Ophthalm, Farnborough GU14 0NL, Hants, England
[2] Ctr Hosp Reg & Univ Lille, Hop Huriez, F-59037 Lille, France
[3] CLIROPHTHA, Nice, France
[4] MEDproject Pharma, Farnborough, Hants, England
关键词
intraocular pressure; ocular hypertension; primary open angle glaucoma; timolol gel; timolol solution;
D O I
10.1159/000067548
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
In a prospective, randomised, double-masked, parallel-group, multi-centre study, 210 patients with primary open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension were enrolled of whom 167 (timolol 0.1% gel 82, timolol 0.5% 85) completed the study as per protocol. The change in intraocular pressure between baseline and week 12 in the worse eye ('at trough') was 6.3 (SD 3.3) mm Hg on timolol 0.1% gel and 7.0 (2.9) mm Hg on timolol 0.5%; this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.19). The difference between the two study groups in the change of intraocular pressure from baseline was 0.62 mm Hg; the 90% Cl of -0.09 to +1.33 mm Hg was within the pre-specified limits of -1.5 to +1.5 mm Hg demonstrating equivalence between timolol 0.1% gel and timolol 0.5%. The plasma levels of timolol (ng/ml) at 12 weeks in the timolol 0.1% gel group were significantly less than that with timolol 0.5% both before instillation (mean 0.057, SD 0.131 and mean 0.470, SD 0.519 respectively, p = 0.025) and after instillation (mean 0.552, SD 0.992 and mean 2.473, SD 1.780 respectively, p = 0.008). Both treatments were well tolerated with no statistically significant difference between the groups in the occurrence of ocular or systemic adverse events. Copyright (C) 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 454
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   OPHTHALMIC TOPICAL BETA-BLOCKERS - REVIEW OF OCULAR AND SYSTEMIC ADVERSE-EFFECTS [J].
AKINGBEHIN, T ;
RAJ, PS .
JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY-CUTANEOUS AND OCULAR TOXICOLOGY, 1990, 9 (02) :131-147
[2]  
Ardjomand N., 2001, SPEKTRUM AUGENHEILKD, V15, P9, DOI [10.1007/bf03162911, DOI 10.1007/BF03162911]
[3]  
Ardjomand N., 2000, SPEKTRUM AUGENHEILKD, V14, P203, DOI [10.1007/bf03162804, DOI 10.1007/BF03162804]
[4]  
ELENA PP, 1993, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V34, P1490
[5]   SYSTEMIC SIDE-EFFECTS FROM OPHTHALMIC TIMOLOL AND THEIR PREVENTION [J].
FRAUNFELDER, FT ;
MEYER, SM .
JOURNAL OF OCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 1987, 3 (02) :177-184
[6]  
GREENBERG RN, 1984, CLIN THER, V6, P592
[7]   Beta-blocker eyedrops and nocturnal arterial hypotension [J].
Hayreh, SS ;
Podhajsky, P ;
Zimmerman, MB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 128 (03) :301-309
[8]  
HOEH HR, 1999, AUGENSPIEGEL, V10, P24
[9]   COMPLIANCE WITH TOPICAL TIMOLOL TREATMENT [J].
KASS, MA ;
GORDON, M ;
MORLEY, RE ;
MELTZER, DW ;
GOLDBERG, JJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1987, 103 (02) :188-193
[10]  
Laurence J, 1993, J Glaucoma, V2, P177