Agency problems and governance mechanisms in collaborative communities

被引:29
作者
Kolbjornsrud, Vegard [1 ]
机构
[1] Accenture Inst High Performance, POB 363, N-1329 Lysaker, Norway
关键词
agency problems; collaborative community; governance mechanisms; OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE; NETWORK GOVERNANCE; INTERORGANIZATIONAL COLLABORATION; TRUST; KNOWLEDGE; MARKET; ORGANIZATION; INNOVATION; FORMS; FIRM;
D O I
10.1177/1476127016653727
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Collaborative communitieswhere participants collaboratively solve problems and integrate their contributionsare increasingly popular organizational forms in a wide variety of domains. As with any cooperative effort, communities involve differential interests and information asymmetries, creating potential agency problems. I undertake an exploratory multiple-case study of four communities within the domains of enterprise information technology, sustainable products and services, drug discovery, and digital marketing and communication. I find that agency relationships in the collaborative communities are characterized by three distinct multiple-agency structures: commons, team production, and brokering. These are governed by four main categories of mechanism: (1) mutual monitoring, enabling self-regulation and peer-based control; (2) membership restrictions, regulating admission to the community; (3) values and rules, guiding member action and collaboration; and (4) property rights and incentives, regulating rights to community resources and distribution of rewards. I also identify contingencies between governance mechanisms and agency problems.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 173
页数:33
相关论文
共 129 条
[91]  
Pettigrew AM., 1993, MANAGING CHANGE COMP
[92]   LONGITUDINAL FIELD RESEARCH ON CHANGE: THEORY AND PRACTICE [J].
Pettigrew, Andrew M. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1990, 1 (03) :267-292
[93]   Network forms of organization [J].
Podolny, JM ;
Page, KL .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 1998, 24 :57-76
[94]  
Pollock TG, 2004, ACAD MANAGE REV, V29, P50, DOI 10.2307/20159008
[95]   Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? [J].
Poppo, L ;
Zenger, T .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2002, 23 (08) :707-725
[96]   Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences [J].
Powell, WW ;
White, DR ;
Koput, KW ;
Owen-Smith, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2005, 110 (04) :1132-1205
[97]  
POWELL WW, 1990, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V12, P295
[98]   Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology [J].
Powell, WW ;
Koput, KW ;
SmithDoerr, L .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1996, 41 (01) :116-145
[99]   Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness [J].
Provan, Keith G. ;
Kenis, Patrick .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2008, 18 (02) :229-252
[100]   WHAT'S "NEW" ABOUT NEW FORMS OF ORGANIZING? [J].
Puranam, Phanish ;
Alexy, Oliver ;
Reitzig, Markus .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2014, 39 (02) :162-180