The impact of structural and contextual factors on trust formation in product development teams

被引:92
作者
Dayan, Mumin [2 ]
Di Benedetto, C. Anthony [1 ]
机构
[1] Temple Univ, Dept Mkt, Fox Sch Business, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[2] United Arab Emirates Univ, Dept Business Adm, Coll Business & Econ, Al Ain, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Trust formation; New product development; Organizational justice; Teamwork; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE; COMMITMENT; PROJECT; MODEL; CONSEQUENCES; ANTECEDENTS; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; DIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.01.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study examines antecedents of trust formation in new product development (NPD) teams and the effects of trust on NPD team performance. A theoretical framework relating structural and contextual factors to interpersonal trust and project outcomes was built, including task complexity as a moderating variable. Hypotheses from this model were tested with data on 93 product development projects carried out in Turkey. The findings showed that structural factors such as moderate level of demographic diversity, proximity of team members, team longevity, and contextual factors (procedural and interactional justices) were positively related to the development of interpersonal trust in NPD teams. The findings also revealed that interpersonal trust had an impact on team learning and new product success, but not on speed-to-market. Further, the findings showed that the impact of interpersonal trust on team learning and new product success was higher when there was higher task complexity. Theoretical and managerial implications of the study findings are discussed. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:691 / 703
页数:13
相关论文
共 118 条
[1]   Knowledge networks in new product development projects:: A transactive memory perspective [J].
Akgün, AE ;
Byrne, J ;
Keskin, H ;
Lynn, GS ;
Imamoglu, SZ .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2005, 42 (08) :1105-1120
[2]   Antecedents and consequences of team stability on new product development performance [J].
Akgün, AE ;
Lynn, GS .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2002, 19 (3-4) :263-286
[3]   A MODEL OF DISTRIBUTOR FIRM AND MANUFACTURER FIRM WORKING PARTNERSHIPS [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
NARUS, JA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1990, 54 (01) :42-58
[4]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1984, GROUPS CONTACT PSYCH
[6]  
[Anonymous], MULTIVARIATE DATA AN
[7]   ASSESSING CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY IN ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH [J].
BAGOZZI, RP ;
LI, YJ ;
PHILLIPS, LW .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1991, 36 (03) :421-458
[8]  
Bentler P.M., 2005, EQS STRUCTURAL EQUAT
[9]  
BIES RobertJ., 1986, Research on negotiation in organizations, P43, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1559-1816.2004.TB02581.X
[10]   Innovation in project-based firms: The context dependency of success factors [J].
Blindenbach-Driessen, Floortje ;
van den Ende, Jan .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2006, 35 (04) :545-561