A comparison of the effect of two anaesthetic techniques on surgical conditions during gynaecological laparoscopy

被引:47
作者
Williams, MT [1 ]
Rice, I [1 ]
Ewen, SP [1 ]
Elliott, SM [1 ]
机构
[1] Queen Alexandra Hosp, Portsmouth, Hants, England
关键词
anaesthesia : safety; surgery; laparoscopic; gynaecology;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03150.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
In a prospective, randomised, controlled trial, we compared the effects of two anaesthetic techniques on surgical conditions during day-case, gynaecological laparoscopic procedures in 40 female patients. Patients were allocated randomly to two groups, either to breathe spontaneously through a laryngeal mask airway or to receive a neuromuscular-blocking agent (NMB) and have the lungs ventilated via a tracheal tube. We then measured the number of attempts of Verres' needle insertion, initial intra-abdominal pressure, time to reach a steady 15 mmHg (1.97 kPa) of intra-abdominal pressure, adequacy of the pneumoperitoneum, operative view and duration of operation. We found that the initial intra-abdominal pressure was higher and the operation time shorter in the laryngeal mask group. The adequacy of the pneumoperitoneum for trocar placement was better in the NMB group. We conclude that the anaesthetic technique of spontaneously breathing through a laryngeal mask airway reduces total operation time. However surgeons should be aware of the different abdominal pressure patterns produced by each anaesthetic technique, and anaesthetists must consider the implications of the anaesthetic technique on surgical safety.
引用
收藏
页码:574 / 578
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Complications of laparoscopy - Operative and diagnostic [J].
Bateman, BG ;
Kolp, LA ;
Hoeger, K .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1996, 66 (01) :30-35
[2]   Trocar injuries in laparoscopic surgery [J].
Bhoyrul, S ;
Vierra, MA ;
Nezhat, CR ;
Krummel, TM ;
Way, LW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2001, 192 (06) :677-683
[3]   POSTOPERATIVE MORBIDITY FOLLOWING GYNECOLOGICAL OUTPATIENT LAPAROSCOPY - A REAPPRAISAL OF THE SERVICE [J].
COLLINS, KM ;
DOCHERTY, PW ;
PLANTEVIN, OM .
ANAESTHESIA, 1984, 39 (08) :819-822
[4]   Abdominal pressure during laparoscopy: effects of fentanyl [J].
Drummond, GB ;
Duncan, NK .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 88 (03) :384-388
[5]   Morbidity in laparoscopic gynecological surgery -: Results of a prospective single-center study [J].
Mac Cordick, C ;
Lécuru, F ;
Rizk, E ;
Robin, F ;
Boucaya, V ;
Taurelle, R .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1999, 13 (01) :57-61
[6]   Comparison of transperitoneal laparoscopic access techniques: Optiview visualizing trocar and Veress needle [J].
Marcovich, R ;
Del Terzo, MA ;
Wolf, JS .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2000, 14 (02) :175-179
[7]   Abdominal access complications in laparoscopic surgery [J].
Philips, PA ;
Amaral, JF .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2001, 192 (04) :525-536
[8]  
Reich H, 1999, JSLS, V3, P45
[9]   Anaesthesia for daycase gynaecological laparoscopy: a survey of clinical practice in the United Kingdom [J].
Simpson, RB ;
Russell, D .
ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 54 (01) :72-76
[10]   ANESTHESIA FOR GYNECOLOGICAL LAPAROSCOPY - A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY AND TRACHEAL INTUBATION [J].
SWANN, DG ;
SPENS, H ;
EDWARDS, SA ;
CHESTNUT, RJ .
ANAESTHESIA, 1993, 48 (05) :431-434