Eight Archetypes of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Synergies and Trade-Offs

被引:31
作者
Moallemi, E. A. [1 ]
Hosseini, S. H. [2 ]
Eker, S. [3 ,4 ]
Gao, L. [5 ]
Bertone, E. [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Szetey, K. [1 ,9 ]
Bryan, B. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Ctr Integrat Ecol, Sch Life & Environm Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Management Syst Engn Inst SAMAM, Tehran, Iran
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Nijmegen Sch Management, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, Laxenburg, Austria
[5] CSIRO, Waite Campus, Urrbrae, SA, Australia
[6] Griffith Univ, Sch Engn & Built Environm, Gold Coast, Australia
[7] Griffith Univ, Cities Res Inst, Southport, Qld, Australia
[8] Griffith Univ, Australian Rivers Inst, Nathan, Qld, Australia
[9] CSIRO Land & Water, Black Mountain, ACT, Australia
关键词
SYSTEMS THINKING; CLIMATE; DYNAMICS; MANAGEMENT; POLICY; ENERGY; ADAPTATION; MITIGATION; INSIGHTS; WATER;
D O I
10.1029/2022EF002873
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is contingent on managing complex interactions that create synergies and trade-offs between different goals. It is, therefore, important to improve our understanding of them, their underlying causal drivers, future behaviors, and policy implications. Prominent methods of interaction analysis that focus on modeling or data-driven statistical correlation are often insufficient for giving an integrated view of interaction drivers and their complexity. These methods are also usually too technically complex and heavily data-driven to provide decision-makers with simple practical tools and easily actionable and understandable results. Here, we introduce a flexible and practical systemic approach, termed archetype analysis, that generalizes a number of recurring interaction patterns among the SDGs with unique drivers, behaviors, and policy implications. We review eight interaction archetypes as thinking aids to analyze some of the important synergies and trade-offs, supported by several empirical examples related to the SDGs (e.g., poverty, food, well-being, water, energy, housing, climate, and land use) to demonstrate how they can be operationalized in practice. The interaction archetypes are aimed to help researchers and policymakers as a diagnostic tool to identify fundamental mechanisms of barriers or policy resistance to SDG progress, a comparative tool to enhance knowledge transfer between different cases with similar drivers, and a prospective tool to design synergistic policies for sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]   A computational Intelligence-based Method to "Learn' Causal Loop Diagram-like Structures from Observed Data [J].
Abdelbari, Hassan ;
Shafi, Kamran .
SYSTEM DYNAMICS REVIEW, 2017, 33 (01) :3-33
[2]   Environmental impacts of coal subsidies in Turkey: A general equilibrium analysis [J].
Acar, Sevil ;
Yeldan, A. Erinc .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 90 :1-15
[3]   Aral Sea syndrome desiccates Lake Urmia: Call for action [J].
AghaKouchak, Amir ;
Norouzi, Hamid ;
Madani, Kaveh ;
Mirchi, Ali ;
Azarderakhsh, Marzi ;
Nazemi, Ali ;
Nasrollahi, Nasrin ;
Farahmand, Alireza ;
Mehran, Ali ;
Hasanzadeh, Elmira .
JOURNAL OF GREAT LAKES RESEARCH, 2015, 41 (01) :307-311
[4]  
Ahmed M.F., 2014, Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, V4, P161
[5]   Greater gains for Australia by tackling all SDGs but the last steps will be the most challenging [J].
Allen, Cameron ;
Metternicht, Graciela ;
Wiedmann, Thomas ;
Pedercini, Matteo .
NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 2 (11) :1041-1050
[6]   A systems model of SDG target influence on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development [J].
Anderson, Carl C. ;
Denich, Manfred ;
Warchold, Anne ;
Kropp, Jurgen P. ;
Pradhan, Prajal .
SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2022, 17 (04) :1459-1472
[7]  
Bach MP, 2014, KYBERNETES, V43, P587, DOI [10.1108/K-09-2013.0195, 10.1108/K-09-2013-0195]
[9]   Prioritising Sustainable Development Goals, characterising interactions, and identifying solutions for local sustainability [J].
Bandari, Reihaneh ;
Moallemi, Enayat A. ;
Lester, Rebecca E. ;
Downie, David ;
Bryan, Brett A. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2022, 127 :325-336
[10]   EXPLORATORY MODELING FOR POLICY ANALYSIS [J].
BANKES, S .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1993, 41 (03) :435-449