Risk factors for cesarean section by category of health service

被引:21
作者
Mendoza-Sassi, Raul Andres [1 ]
Cesar, Juraci Almeida [1 ]
da Silva, Patricia Rodrigues [1 ]
Denardin, Giovana [1 ]
Rodrigues, Mariana Mendes [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande, Fac Med, Divisao Populacao & Saude, Rio Grande, RS, Brazil
来源
REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA | 2010年 / 44卷 / 01期
关键词
Cesarean Section; Risk Factors; Socioeconomic Factors; Health Maintenance Organizations; Supplemental Health; Single Health System; Cross-Sectional Studies; SOUTHERN BRAZIL; PERINATAL HEALTH; LATIN-AMERICA; BIRTH COHORT; 2ND OPINION; RATES; DELIVERY; INEQUALITIES; PRIVATE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1590/S0034-89102010000100009
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the rate of cesarean section and differences in risk factors by category of health service, either public or private. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out including all pregnant women in labor admitted to hospitals in the city of Rio Grande, Southern Brazil, between January 1 and December 31, 2007. A pre-coded and pretested questionnaire was used to collect on social, demographic, obstetric and newborn care information. Two regression models were constructed: one for public users and the other one for private ones. Poisson regression was used in each model in the multivariate analysis. Prevalence rates and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each adjusted factor. RESULTS: The rate of cesarean section was 43% and 86% among public and private users. Sociodemographic factors and twin births have a more significant impact among public users as well as number of pregnancies (25% vs. 13% reduction in public and private users, respectively) and previous cesarean section (86% vs. 24% increase in public and private users, respectively). Prenatal care visits and hospital admissions affected the outcome only in women users of public services. CONCLUSIONS: Cesarean section rates were high in both groups studied, but it was twice as high among women cared in the private sector. Associated factors differ in magnitude by category of service used.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 89
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Mandatory second opinion to reduce rates of unnecessary caesarean sections in Latin America:: a cluster randomised controlled trial [J].
Althabe, F ;
Belizán, JM ;
Villar, J ;
Alexander, S ;
Bergel, E ;
Ramos, S ;
Romero, M ;
Donner, A ;
Lindmark, G ;
Langer, A ;
Farnot, U ;
Cecatti, JG ;
Carroli, G ;
Kestler, E .
LANCET, 2004, 363 (9425) :1934-1940
[2]   EPIDEMIC OF CESAREAN SECTIONS IN BRAZIL [J].
BARROS, FC ;
VAUGHAN, JP ;
VICTORA, CG ;
HUTTLY, SRA .
LANCET, 1991, 338 (8760) :167-169
[3]   Ethnicity and infant health in Southern Brazil. A birth cohort study [J].
Barros, FC ;
Victora, CG ;
Horta, BL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 30 (05) :1001-1008
[4]   Consumer demand for caesarean sections in Brazil:: population based birth cohort study linking ethnographic an epidemiological methods [J].
Béhague, DP ;
Victora, CG ;
Barros, FC .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7343) :942-+
[5]   The use of maternal and child health services in three population-based cohorts in Southern Brazil, 1982-2004 [J].
Cesar, Juraci A. ;
Matijasevich, Alicia ;
Santos, Ina S. ;
Barros, Aluisio J. D. ;
Dias-da-Costa, Juvenal S. ;
Barros, Fernando C. ;
Victora, Cesar G. .
CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2008, 24 :S427-S436
[6]  
D'Orsi Eleonora, 2006, Cad. Saúde Pública, V22, P2067, DOI 10.1590/S0102-311X2006001000012
[7]   Socioeconomic factors and cesarean section rates [J].
Fabri, RH ;
Murta, EFC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2002, 76 (01) :87-88
[8]   Factors associated with preference for cesarean delivery [J].
Faisal-Cury, A ;
Menezes, PR .
REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2006, 40 (02) :226-232
[9]   Brazlian women and physicians viewpomts on their preferred route of delivery [J].
Faúndes, A ;
de Pádua, KS ;
Osis, MJD ;
Cecatti, JG ;
de Sousa, MH .
REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2004, 38 (04) :488-494
[10]   Social inequalities in cesarean section rates in primiparae, Southern Brazil [J].
Freitas, PF ;
Drachler, MD ;
Leite, JCD ;
Grassi, PR .
REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2005, 39 (05) :761-767