Laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis reduces the risk of surgical site infections: An ACS-NSQIP study

被引:0
作者
Herman, Koby [1 ]
Nemeth, Samantha [1 ]
Shen, Bo [1 ]
Church, James M. [1 ]
Kiran, Ravi P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, New York Presbyterian, Irving Med Ctr, Colorectal Surg, Washington Ave 8th Fl, New York, NY 10032 USA
来源
SURGERY IN PRACTICE AND SCIENCE | 2022年 / 10卷
关键词
Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis; Colorectal; IBD; Laparoscopic surgery; CONVENTIONAL RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY; BODY-IMAGE; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; IPAA;
D O I
10.1016/j.sipas.2022.100114
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Previous literature related to postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic vs. open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is primarily based on small numbers of patients from single institutions. The aim of this study is to evaluate these outcomes in a large number of patients using propensity score matching (PSM).Material and Methods: The ACS-NSQIP Program data files (2016-2019) were reviewed to identify patients who underwent an IPAA creation. The impact of surgical approach on operative and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) on all patient characteristics was used to obtain matched groups. Fisher's Exact/Chi-Squared tests were used to compare outcomes between groups. A Bonferroni correction was applied to the outcomes, with a p-value of 0.0031 representing statistical significance.Results: 1802 patients were identified, with 1001 patients in the laparoscopic group and 801 patients in the open group. PSM yielded 702 patients in each matched group. Median operative time was longer for laparoscopic IPAA (278vs218.5 minutes, p<0.001). Laparoscopic IPAA patients were less likely to develop superficial and deep SSIs (3.0% vs 6.6% p=0.003). There were no differences in in-hospital mortality (0.4% vs 0.0%, p=0.3), anastomotic leak (4.0% vs 3.3%, p=1.0), organ-space SSI (6.7% vs 6.0, p=1.0), or reoperation (5.7% vs 4.0%, p=0.2) between groups. Length of stay was lower after laparoscopic IPAA (5.0 vs 6.0 days, p=0.004). There were no differences between groups in other postoperative complications.Discussion: These data suggest that when matched for other confounding variables, laparoscopic IPAA is associated with reduced length of stay and superficial/deep SSIs when compared to open IPAA. Other surgical complications, including in-hospital mortality and anastomotic leak, are similar.Conclusion: Given the recovery benefit of the laparoscopic approach and the reduced SSI, laparoscopy should be the method of choice for the majority of patients undergoing IPAA.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Open versus laparoscopic (assisted) ileo pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis
    Ali, Usama Ahmed
    Keus, Frederik
    Heikens, Joost T.
    Bemelman, Willem A.
    Berdah, Stephane V.
    Gooszen, H. G.
    van Laarhoven, Cees J. H. M.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (01):
  • [2] Araki Yasumi, 2001, Kurume Medical Journal, V48, P99
  • [3] Laparoscopic ileoanal pouch surgery
    Bemelman, W. A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 (01) : 2 - 3
  • [4] Laparoscopic IPAA Is Not Associated With Decreased Rates of Incisional Hernia and Small-Bowel Obstruction When Compared With Open Technique: Long-term Follow-up of a Case-Matched Study
    Benlice, Cigdem
    Stocchi, Luca
    Costedio, Meagan
    Gorgun, Emre
    Hull, Tracy
    Kessler, Hermann
    Remzi, Feza H.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2015, 58 (03) : 314 - 320
  • [5] Two stage videoassisted restorative proctocolectomy. Early experience of 12 cases
    Berdah, SV
    Barthet, M
    Emungania, O
    Orsoni, P
    Alliot, P
    Grimaud, JC
    Brunet, C
    [J]. ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE, 2004, 129 (6-7): : 332 - 336
  • [6] Consecutive series of laparoscopic-assisted vs. minilaparotomy restorative proctocolectomies
    Brown, SR
    Eu, KW
    Seow-Choen, F
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2001, 44 (03) : 397 - 400
  • [7] The potential benefits and disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery for ulcerative colitis: A review of current evidence
    Buskens, Christianne J.
    Sahami, Saloomeh
    Tanis, Pieter J.
    Bemelman, Willem A.
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 28 (01) : 19 - 27
  • [8] Laparoscopic Versus Open Restorative Proctocolectomy for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis
    Campos, Fabio Guilherme
    Real Martinez, Carlos Augusto
    Monteiro de Camargo, Mariane Gouveia
    Cesconetto, Daniele Menezes
    Nahas, Sergio Carlos
    Cecconello, Ivan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 28 (01): : 47 - 52
  • [9] Minimally invasive surgery and stoma-related complications after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. A two-centre comparison with open approach
    Colombo, Francesco
    Pellino, Gianluca
    Selvaggi, Francesco
    Corsi, Fabio
    Sciaudone, Guido
    Sampietro, Gianluca M.
    Foschi, Diego
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 217 (04) : 682 - 688
  • [10] Functional outcome, quality of life, body image, and cosmesis in patients after laparoscopic assisted and conventional restorative proctocolectomy - A comparative study
    Dunker, MS
    Bemelman, WA
    Slors, JFM
    van Duijvendijk, P
    Gouma, DJ
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2001, 44 (12) : 1800 - 1807