Performance Comparison Between SURPAS and ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in Pulmonary Resection

被引:10
|
作者
Chudgar, Neel P. [1 ]
Yan, Shi [1 ,2 ]
Hsu, Meier [1 ]
Tan, Kay See [1 ]
Gray, Katherine D. [3 ]
Molena, Daniela [1 ]
Nobel, Tamar [4 ]
Adusumilli, Prasad S. [1 ]
Bains, Manjit [1 ]
Downey, Robert J. [1 ]
Huang, James [1 ]
Park, Bernard J. [1 ]
Rocco, Gaetano [1 ]
Rusch, Valerie W. [1 ]
Sihag, Smita [1 ]
Jones, David R. [1 ]
Isbell, James M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Thorac Surg Serv, Dept Surg, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Peking Univ Canc Hosp & Inst, Dept Thorac Surg 2, Key Lab Carcinogenesis & Translat Res, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Weill Cornell Med, Dept Surg, New York Presbyterian Hosp, New York, NY USA
[4] Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Surg, New York, NY USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ASSESSMENT SYSTEM SURPAS; THORACIC-SURGERY; PREDICT; THORACOSCORE; SOCIETY; QUALITY; MODEL; MORTALITY; DECISION; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.08.021
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Accurate preoperative risk assessment is critical for informed decision making. The Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System (SURPAS) and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Surgical Risk Calculator (SRC) predict risks of common postoperative complications. This study compares observed and predicted outcomes after pulmonary resection between SURPAS and NSQIP SRC. Methods. Between January 2016 and December 2018, 2514 patients underwent pulmonary resection and were included. We entered the requisite patient demographics, preoperative risk factors, and procedural details into the online NSQIP SRC and SURPAS formulas. Performance of the prediction models was assessed by discrimination and calibration. Results. No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 models in discrimination performance for 30-day mortality, urinary tract infection, readmission, and discharge to a nursing or rehabilitation facility. The ability to discriminate between a patient who will develop a complication and a patient who will not was statistically indistinguishable between NSQIP and SURPAS, except for renal failure. With a C index closer to 1.0, the NSQIP performed significantly better than the SURPAS SRC in discriminating risk of renal failure (C index, 0.798 vs 0.694; P = .003). The calibration curves of predicted and observed risk for each model demonstrate similar performance with a tendency toward overestimation of risk, apart from renal failure. Conclusions. Overall, SURPAS and NSQIP SRC performed similarly in predicting outcomes for pulmonary resections in this large, single-center validation study with moderate to good discrimination of outcomes. Notably, SURPAS uses a smaller set of input variables to generate the preoperative risk assessment. The addition of thoracic-specific input variables may improve performance. (C) 2021 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:1643 / 1651
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of accuracy of prediction of postoperative mortality and morbidity between a new, parsimonious risk calculator (SURPAS) and the ACS Surgical Risk Calculator
    Khaneki, Sina
    Bronsert, Michael R.
    Henderson, William G.
    Yazdanfar, Maryam
    Lambert-Kerzner, Anne
    Hammermeister, Karl E.
    Meguid, Robert A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 219 (06) : 1065 - 1072
  • [2] Evaluation of the Performance of ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in Emergency General Surgery Patients
    Long, Andrea M.
    Hildreth, Amy N.
    Davis, Patrick T.
    Ur, Rebecca
    Badger, Ashley T.
    Miller, Preston R.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2020, 86 (02) : 83 - 89
  • [3] Evaluation of the performance of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing laparotomy
    Rivard, Colleen
    Nahum, Rebi
    Slagle, Elizabeth
    Duininck, Megan
    Vogel, Rachel Isaksson
    Teoh, Deanna
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2016, 141 (02) : 281 - 286
  • [4] Hypoalbuminemia improves the ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculator for gastrectomy
    Patel, Nikita S.
    Herzog, Isabel
    Vought, Rita
    Merchant, Aziz M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 229 : 121 - 128
  • [5] Comparison of Observed to Predicted Outcomes Using the ACS NSQIP Risk Calculator in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Mogal, Harveshp D.
    Fino, Nora
    Clark, Clancy
    Shen, Perry
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 114 (02) : 157 - 162
  • [6] Validation of the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator for Patients with Early Gastric Cancer Treated with Laparoscopic Gastrectomy
    Alzahrani, Saleh M.
    Ko, Chang Seok
    Yoo, Moon-Won
    JOURNAL OF GASTRIC CANCER, 2020, 20 (03) : 267 - 276
  • [7] Accuracy of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator to predict morbidity and mortality in Mexican patients
    Macias-Cervantes, Jose J.
    Vazquez-Renteria, Rafael S.
    Lopez-Romero, Sandra C.
    Gracida-Mancilla, Noe I.
    CIRUGIA Y CIRUJANOS, 2022, 90 (02): : 229 - 235
  • [8] Evaluation of the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in Elderly Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Sahara, Kota
    Paredes, Anghela Z.
    Merath, Katiuscha
    Tsilimigras, Diamantis, I
    Bagante, Fabio
    Ratti, Francesca
    Marques, Hugo P.
    Soubrane, Olivier
    Beal, Eliza W.
    Lam, Vincent
    Poultsides, George A.
    Popescu, Irinel
    Alexandrescu, Sorin
    Martel, Guillaume
    Aklile, Workneh
    Guglielmi, Alfredo
    Hugh, Tom
    Aldrighetti, Luca
    Endo, Itaru
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2020, 24 (03) : 551 - 559
  • [9] ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator: Pilot Analysis on Feasibility in an Academic Safety Net Hospital
    Jensen, A. M.
    Crandall, M. L.
    Tepas, J. J., III
    Ra, J. H.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 236 : 124 - 128
  • [10] Predicting complications of major head and neck oncological surgery: an evaluation of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator
    Vosler, Peter S.
    Orsini, Mario
    Enepekides, Danny J.
    Higgins, Kevin M.
    JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2018, 47