Genomic relatedness of Clostridium difficile strains from different toxinotypes and serogroups

被引:10
作者
Wozniak, G [1 ]
Trontelj, P [1 ]
Rupnik, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Biotech Fac, Dept Biol, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
关键词
Clostridium difficile; toxinotypes; molecular typing;
D O I
10.1006/anae.2000.0349
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Clostridium difficile strains can be divided into sixteen toxinotypes (0 and I to XV) according to changes in their toxin genes. To determine the genomic similarity between toxinotypes, two molecular typing techniques were used, AP-PCR and PFGE. Strains were selected from five serogroups (Al, A15, E, F, X) and represented non-toxinogenic isolates, strains with toxin genes identical to the reference C. difficile strain, VPI 10463 (toxinotype 0), and strains with variant toxin genes from toxinotypes III, TV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, and XI. The strains studied formed three main clusters, which correlated well with serogroups: in the first were strains from serogroup A15 and E; in the second, serogroup Al strains; and in the third, strains from serogroups F and X. Within these three clusters strains of a single toxinotype were grouped together. Toxinotypes III, IV and VIII were more similar to strains with ordinary toxin genes or non-toxinogenic isolates within the same serogroup than to other toxinotypes. Toxinotypes V, VI, VII, and XI, which exhibit similar changes in their toxin genes, seem to be more closely related one to another than to other toxinotypes. It can be concluded that variant Clostridium difficile strains do not have a common ancestor and that groups of different toxinotypes arose independently from strains with ordinary toxin genes. (C) 2000 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 267
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   INVESTIGATION OF A NOSOCOMIAL OUTBREAK OF CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE-ASSOCIATED DIARRHEA AMONG AIDS PATIENTS BY RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA (RAPD) ASSAY [J].
BARBUT, F ;
MARIO, N ;
MEYOHAS, MC ;
BINET, D ;
FROTTIER, J ;
PETIT, JC .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1994, 26 (03) :181-189
[2]  
BLACK B, 1997, FORTRAN PROGRAMS ANA
[3]   Definition of the single integration site of the pathogenicity locus in Clostridium difficile [J].
Braun, V ;
Hundsberger, T ;
Leukel, P ;
Sauerborn, M ;
vonEichelStreiber, C .
GENE, 1996, 181 (1-2) :29-38
[4]   The epidemiology and typing of Clostridium difficile [J].
Brazier, JS .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1998, 41 :47-57
[5]   COMPARISON OF RIBOTYPING, PULSED-FIELD GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS AND RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA FOR TYPING CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE STRAINS [J].
CHACHATY, E ;
SAULNIER, P ;
MARTIN, A ;
MARIO, N ;
ANDREMONT, A .
FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS, 1994, 122 (1-2) :61-68
[6]   SEROGROUPING OF CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE STRAINS BY SLIDE AGGLUTINATION [J].
DELMEE, M ;
HOMEL, M ;
WAUTERS, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1985, 21 (03) :323-327
[7]  
Felsenstein J, 1995, PHYLIP PHYLOGENY INF
[8]   THE TOXIGENIC ELEMENT OF CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE STRAIN VPI-10463 [J].
HAMMOND, GA ;
JOHNSON, JL .
MICROBIAL PATHOGENESIS, 1995, 19 (04) :203-213
[9]   Identification of toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive Clostridium difficile by PCR [J].
Kato, H ;
Kato, N ;
Watanabe, K ;
Iwai, N ;
Nakamura, H ;
Yamamoto, T ;
Suzuki, K ;
Kim, SM ;
Chong, Y ;
Wasito, EB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1998, 36 (08) :2178-2182
[10]   Clostridium difficile:: A pathogen of the nineties [J].
Riley, TV .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1998, 17 (03) :137-141