Significance of histology and nodal status on the survival of women with early-stage cervical cancer: validation of the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer staging system

被引:1
|
作者
Machida, Hiroko [1 ]
Matsuo, Koji [2 ,3 ]
Kobayashi, Yoichi [4 ]
Momomura, Mai [4 ]
Takahashi, Fumiaki [5 ]
Tabata, Tsutomu [6 ]
Kondo, Eiji [7 ]
Yamagami, Wataru [8 ]
Ebina, Yasuhiko [9 ]
Kaneuchi, Masanori [10 ]
Nagase, Satoru [11 ]
Mikami, Mikio [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokai Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Div Gynecol Oncol, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Norris Comprehens Canc Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[4] Kyorin Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Tokyo, Japan
[5] Iwate Med Univ, Dept Informat Sci, Div Med Engn, Morioka, Iwate, Japan
[6] Tokyo Womens Med Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Tokyo, Japan
[7] Mie Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Tsu, Mie, Japan
[8] Keio Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, Tokyo, Japan
[9] Hokkaido Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
[10] Otaru Gen Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Otaru, Hokkaido, Japan
[11] Yamagata Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Yamagata, Japan
关键词
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; Neoplasm Staging; Histological Type of Neoplasm; Lymph Node Metastasis; Survival; PELVIC RADIATION-THERAPY; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; HIGH-RISK; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; LYMPHADENECTOMY; METASTASIS; CARCINOMA; HEALTH; JAPAN; IIA;
D O I
10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e26
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the efficacy of the FIGO 2018 classification system for nodal-specific classifications for early-stage cervical cancer; specifically, to examine the impact of nodal metastasis on survival and the effect of postoperative treatments, according to histological subtypes. Methods: This society-based retrospective observational study in Japan examined 16,539 women with the 2009 FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer who underwent primary surgical treatment from 2004 to 2015. Associations of cause-specific survival (CSS) with nodal metastasis and postoperative adjuvant therapy were examined according to histology type (squamous cell carcinoma [SCC], n=10,315; and non-SCC, n=6,224). Results: The nodal metastasis rate for SCC was higher than that for non-SCC (10.7% vs. 8.3%, p<0.001). In multivariable analysis, the impact of nodal metastasis on CSS was greater for non-SCC tumors (adjusted-hazard ratio [HR], 3.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.40- 4.02) than for SCC tumors (adjusted-HR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.70-2.84; p<0.001). Propensity score matching analysis showed significantly lower CSS rates for women with pelvic nodal metastasis from non-SCC tumors than from SCC tumors (5-year CSS rate, 75.4% vs. 90.3%, p<0.001).The CSS rates for women with nodal metastasis in SCC histology were similar between the postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy and chemotherapy groups (89.2% vs. 86.1%, p=0.42), whereas those in non-SCC histology who received postoperative chemotherapy improved the CSS (74.1% vs. 67.7%, p=0.043). Conclusion: The node-specific staging system in the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer classification is applicable to both non-SCC tumors and SCC tumors; however, the prognostic significance of nodal metastases and efficacy of postoperative therapies vary according to histology.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ovarian Conservation and Overall Survival in Young Women With Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
    Matsuo, Koji
    Machida, Hiroko
    Shoupe, Donna
    Melamed, Alexander
    Muderspach, Laila I.
    Roman, Lynda D.
    Wright, Jason D.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 (01) : 139 - 151
  • [22] Parametrial involvement in women with low-risk, early-stage cervical cancer
    Vanichtantikul, A.
    Tantbirojn, P.
    Manchana, T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2017, 26 (05)
  • [23] Implications of the revised cervical cancer FIGO staging system
    Bhatla, Neerja
    Singhal, Seema
    Dhamija, Ekta
    Mathur, Sandeep
    Natarajan, Jayashree
    Maheshwari, Amita
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 154 (02) : 273 - 283
  • [24] Surgically treated cervical cancer in a high-risk group in the era of the 2018 FIGO staging schema: a nationwide study
    Shigeta, Shogo
    Shimada, Muneaki
    Tsuji, Keita
    Watanabe, Zen
    Tanase, Yasuhito
    Matsuo, Koji
    Nakanishi, Toru
    Saito, Toshiaki
    Aoki, Daisuke
    Mikami, Mikio
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [25] Sentinel Lymph Node Staging in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Comprehensive Review
    Margioula-Siarkou, Chrysoula
    Almperis, Aristarchos
    Gullo, Giuseppe
    Almperi, Emmanouela-Aliki
    Margioula-Siarkou, Georgia
    Nixarlidou, Eleni
    Mponiou, Konstantina
    Papakotoulas, Pavlos
    Sardeli, Chrysanthi
    Guyon, Frederic
    Dinas, Konstantinos
    Petousis, Stamatios
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [26] Detection and Significance of Parametrial Micrometastases in Early-stage Cervical Cancer
    Brady, Paula C.
    Chen, Xiaowei
    Burke, William M.
    Deutsch, Israel
    Sun, Xuming
    Herzog, Thomas J.
    Wright, Jason D.
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 31 (01) : 243 - 247
  • [27] A comprehensive analysis of the factors of positive pelvic lymph nodes on survival of cervical cancer patients with 2018 FIGO stage IIIC1p
    Yan, Ding-Ding
    Tang, Qiu
    Tu, Ye-Qiang
    Chen, Jian-Hong
    Lv, Xiao-Juan
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2019, 11 : 4223 - 4230
  • [28] Adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage cervical cancer
    Hiroshi Asano
    Yukiharu Todo
    Hidemichi Watari
    Chinese Journal of Cancer Research, 2016, 28 (02) : 228 - 234
  • [29] The surgical management of early-stage cervical cancer
    Salicru, Sabina R.
    de la Torre, Javier F. V.
    Gil-Moreno, Antonio
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 25 (04) : 312 - 319
  • [30] Fertility-sparing trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A proposal of an ideal candidate
    Machida, Hiroko
    Iwata, Takashi
    Okugawa, Kaoru
    Matsuo, Koji
    Saito, Tsuyoshi
    Tanaka, Kyoko
    Morishige, Kenichiro
    Kobayashi, Hiroaki
    Yoshino, Kiyoshi
    Tokunaga, Hideki
    Ikeda, Tomoaki
    Shozu, Makio
    Yaegashi, Nobuo
    Enomoto, Takayuki
    Mikami, Mikio
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 156 (02) : 341 - 348