Significance of histology and nodal status on the survival of women with early-stage cervical cancer: validation of the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer staging system

被引:1
|
作者
Machida, Hiroko [1 ]
Matsuo, Koji [2 ,3 ]
Kobayashi, Yoichi [4 ]
Momomura, Mai [4 ]
Takahashi, Fumiaki [5 ]
Tabata, Tsutomu [6 ]
Kondo, Eiji [7 ]
Yamagami, Wataru [8 ]
Ebina, Yasuhiko [9 ]
Kaneuchi, Masanori [10 ]
Nagase, Satoru [11 ]
Mikami, Mikio [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokai Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Div Gynecol Oncol, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Norris Comprehens Canc Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[4] Kyorin Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Tokyo, Japan
[5] Iwate Med Univ, Dept Informat Sci, Div Med Engn, Morioka, Iwate, Japan
[6] Tokyo Womens Med Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Tokyo, Japan
[7] Mie Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Tsu, Mie, Japan
[8] Keio Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, Tokyo, Japan
[9] Hokkaido Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
[10] Otaru Gen Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Otaru, Hokkaido, Japan
[11] Yamagata Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Yamagata, Japan
关键词
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; Neoplasm Staging; Histological Type of Neoplasm; Lymph Node Metastasis; Survival; PELVIC RADIATION-THERAPY; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; HIGH-RISK; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; LYMPHADENECTOMY; METASTASIS; CARCINOMA; HEALTH; JAPAN; IIA;
D O I
10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e26
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the efficacy of the FIGO 2018 classification system for nodal-specific classifications for early-stage cervical cancer; specifically, to examine the impact of nodal metastasis on survival and the effect of postoperative treatments, according to histological subtypes. Methods: This society-based retrospective observational study in Japan examined 16,539 women with the 2009 FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer who underwent primary surgical treatment from 2004 to 2015. Associations of cause-specific survival (CSS) with nodal metastasis and postoperative adjuvant therapy were examined according to histology type (squamous cell carcinoma [SCC], n=10,315; and non-SCC, n=6,224). Results: The nodal metastasis rate for SCC was higher than that for non-SCC (10.7% vs. 8.3%, p<0.001). In multivariable analysis, the impact of nodal metastasis on CSS was greater for non-SCC tumors (adjusted-hazard ratio [HR], 3.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.40- 4.02) than for SCC tumors (adjusted-HR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.70-2.84; p<0.001). Propensity score matching analysis showed significantly lower CSS rates for women with pelvic nodal metastasis from non-SCC tumors than from SCC tumors (5-year CSS rate, 75.4% vs. 90.3%, p<0.001).The CSS rates for women with nodal metastasis in SCC histology were similar between the postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy and chemotherapy groups (89.2% vs. 86.1%, p=0.42), whereas those in non-SCC histology who received postoperative chemotherapy improved the CSS (74.1% vs. 67.7%, p=0.043). Conclusion: The node-specific staging system in the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer classification is applicable to both non-SCC tumors and SCC tumors; however, the prognostic significance of nodal metastases and efficacy of postoperative therapies vary according to histology.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer staging system
    Matsuo, Koji
    Machida, Hiroko
    Mandelbaum, Rachel S.
    Konishi, Ikuo
    Mikami, Mikio
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 152 (01) : 87 - 93
  • [2] Validation of the 2018 FIGO Staging System for Predicting the Prognosis of Patients With Stage IIIC Cervical Cancer
    Long, Xingtao
    He, Misi
    Yang, Lingling
    Zou, Dongling
    Wang, Dong
    Chen, Yuemei
    Zhou, Qi
    CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-ONCOLOGY, 2023, 17
  • [3] Prognostic value of the 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer patients with surgical risk factors
    Yan, Ding-Ding
    Tang, Qiu
    Chen, Jian-Hong
    Tu, Ye-Qiang
    Lv, Xiao-Juan
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2019, 11 : 5473 - 5480
  • [4] From FIGO-2009 to FIGO-2018 in women with early-stage cervical cancer; Does the revised staging reflect risk groups?
    Sponholtz, Sara Elisabeth
    Mogensen, Ole
    Hildebrandt, Malene Grubbe
    Schledermann, Doris
    Parner, Erik
    Markauskas, Algirdas
    Froding, Ligita Paskeviciute
    Fuglsang, Katrine
    Holm, Jorun
    Bjornholt, Sarah Marie
    Jensen, Pernille Tine
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 163 (02) : 281 - 288
  • [5] Significance of Malignant Peritoneal Cytology on the Survival of Women with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group Study
    Matsuo, Koji
    Shimada, Muneaki
    Matsuzaki, Shinya
    Machida, Hiroko
    Nagase, Yoshikazu
    Saito, Toshiaki
    Kamiura, Shoji
    Iwata, Takashi
    Sugiyama, Toru
    Mikami, Mikio
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (11)
  • [6] FIGO 2018 staging criteria for cervical cancer: Impact on stage migration and survival
    Grigsby, Perry W.
    Massad, Leslie S.
    Mutch, David G.
    Powell, Matthew A.
    Thaker, Premal H.
    McCourt, Carolyn
    Hagemann, Andrea
    Fuh, Katherine
    Kuroki, Lindsay
    Schwarz, Julie K.
    Markovina, Stephanie
    Lin, Alexander J.
    Dehdashti, Farrokh
    Siegel, Barry A.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 157 (03) : 639 - 643
  • [7] Prognostic value of the 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer
    Mohamud, A.
    Hogdall, C.
    Schnack, T.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 165 (03) : 506 - 513
  • [8] Estimation risk of lymph nodal invasion in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: Cervical cancer application
    Guani, Benedetta
    Gaillard, Thomas
    Teo-Fortin, Ly-Ann
    Balaya, Vincent
    Feki, Anis
    Paoletti, Xavier
    Mathevet, Patrice
    Plante, Marie
    Lecuru, Fabrice
    Senticol Group
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [9] Does the New FIGO 2018 Staging System Allow Better Prognostic Differentiation in Early Stage Cervical Cancer? A Dutch Nationwide Cohort Study
    Ten Eikelder, Mieke L. G.
    Hinten, Floor
    Smits, Anke
    Van der Aa, Maaike A.
    Bekkers, Ruud L. M.
    IntHout, Joanna
    Wenzel, Hans H. B.
    Zusterzeel, Petra L. M.
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (13)
  • [10] Is the revised 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer more prognostic than the 2009 FIGO staging system for women previously staged as IB disease?
    Ayhan, Ali
    Aslan, Koray
    Bulut, Ayca Nazli
    Akilli, Huseyin
    Oz, Murat
    Haberal, Ali
    Meydanli, Mehmet Mutlu
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2019, 240 : 209 - 214