Multi-criteria improvement of complex systems

被引:20
|
作者
Montmain, Jacky [1 ]
Labreuche, Christophe [2 ]
Imoussaten, Abdelhak [1 ]
Trousset, Francois [1 ]
机构
[1] EMA, LGI2P, Parc Sci Georges Besse, F-30035 Nimes, France
[2] Thales Res & Technol, F-91767 Palaiseau, France
关键词
Multiple criteria analysis; Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSP); Industrial performance; Management strategies; Approximate reasoning; Choquet fuzzy integral; PERFORMANCE-MEASUREMENT; CONCURRENT OPTIMIZATION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ins.2014.08.027
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Designing the way a complex system should evolve to better match customers' requirements provides an interesting class of applications for muticriteria techniques. The models required to support the improvement design of a complex system must include both preference models and system behavioral models. A MAUT model captures decisions related to design preferences, whereas a fuzzy representation is proposed to model relationships between system parameters and the fulfillment of system assessment criteria. The way in which these models are jointly used throughout our entire design procedure highlights that both models must be used in tandem to address managerial and implementation issues involved in an improvement project. The iterative improvement process is supported by a mathematical model, in addition to a software tool that allows our approach to be tested in an industrial case study. The search for adequate parameters regarding the improvement design is supported by a branch and bound algorithm to compute the most relevant actions to be performed. The findings confirm the efficiency of the algorithm. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 84
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-criteria improvement of options
    Imoussaten, Abdelhak
    Montmain, Jacky
    Trousset, Francois
    Labreuche, Christophe
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH CONFERENCE OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIETY FOR FUZZY LOGIC AND TECHNOLOGY (EUSFLAT-2011) AND LFA-2011, 2011, : 1030 - 1037
  • [2] Two Approaches to Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Complex Systems
    Vlasova, Tatyana V.
    Lezhnina, Elena A.
    2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE "STABILITY AND CONTROL PROCESSES" IN MEMORY OF V.I. ZUBOV (SCP), 2015, : 501 - 504
  • [3] Multi-criteria analysis for the integrated performance assessment of complex fenestration systems
    Basurto, Chantal
    Kampf, Jerome H.
    Scartezzini, Jean-Louis
    BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2017, 45 (08): : 926 - 942
  • [4] An Improvement on STEM Method in Multi-Criteria Analysis
    Izadikhah, M.
    Alikhani, S.
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL EXTENSION, 2012, 6 (02) : 21 - 39
  • [5] A HYBRID MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION METHOD FOR PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT OF BUILDING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
    Fantana, Gabriel
    UNIVERSITY POLITEHNICA OF BUCHAREST SCIENTIFIC BULLETIN SERIES C-ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2015, 77 (04): : 81 - 94
  • [6] Minimax and Multi-Criteria Selection of Representative Model Portfolios for Complex Systems Analysis
    Gao, Zhenyu
    Li, Yongchang
    Puranik, Tejas G.
    Mavris, Dimitri N.
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2022, 60 (03) : 1505 - 1521
  • [7] Visualising multi-criteria weight elicitation by multiple stakeholders in complex decision systems
    Kunsch, Pierre L.
    Brans, Jean-Pierre
    OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (04) : 955 - 971
  • [8] Visualising multi-criteria weight elicitation by multiple stakeholders in complex decision systems
    Pierre L. Kunsch
    Jean-Pierre Brans
    Operational Research, 2019, 19 : 955 - 971
  • [9] IMPROVEMENT OF EXPERIMENTAL PLANS USING MULTI-CRITERIA APPROACH
    Cajner, Hrvoje
    Sakic, Nikola
    Cosic, Predrag
    TEHNICKI VJESNIK-TECHNICAL GAZETTE, 2012, 19 (03): : 601 - 606
  • [10] Long-term multi-criteria improvement planning
    Hubinont, J. P.
    De Smet, Y.
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2021, 149