Patient-reported indicators in mental health care: towards international standards among members of the OECD

被引:27
作者
de Bienassis, Katherine [1 ]
Kristensen, Solvejg [2 ]
Hewlett, Emily [1 ]
Roe, David [3 ]
Mainz, Jan [4 ]
Klazinga, Niek [1 ]
机构
[1] OECD, Hlth Div, 2 Rue Andre Pascal, F-75016 Paris, France
[2] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Psychiat, Moellepk Vej 10, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
[3] Univ Haifa, Dept Community Mental Hlth, Abba Khoushy Ave 199, IL-3498838 Haifa, Israel
[4] Psychiat Reg Nordjylland, Dept South, Moellepk Vej 10, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
Quality measurement; Quality management; Mental health disorders; Disease categories; Patient-centred care; Guidelines; Appropriate health care; Health policy; Health care system;
D O I
10.1093/intqhc/mzab020
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Achieving people-centred health care systems requires new and innovative strategies to capture information about whether, and to what degree, health care is successful in improving health from the perspective of the patient. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) can bring some of these new insights, and are increasingly used in research, clinical care, and policymaking. Methods: This paper reflects the ongoing discussions and findings of the OECD PaRIS Working Group on Patient-reported Indicators for Mental Health Care. Results: The OECD has been measuring quality of care for mental health conditions over the last 14 years through the Health Care Quality and Outcomes (HCQO) program; nonetheless, information on how persons with mental health problems value the services they receive, and impact of the services, remains limited. As of 2018, a survey from the OECD showed that only five of the twelve countries surveyed (Australia, Israel, Netherlands, Sweden, United Kingdom) reported PROMs and PREMs collection on a regular basis in mental health settings. The paper details some of the challenges specific to the collection and use of PROMs and PREMs in mental health care, and examples from countries which have implemented comprehensive programmes to gather information about PROMs and PREMs for individuals receiving mental health services. Conclusions: Given the health and economic impact of mental ill-health across all OECD countries, there is significant value to being able to assess the quality and outcomes of care in this area using internationally-comparable measures. Continued international harmonisation of PROMs and PREMs for mental health through international coordination is a key way to facilitate the sharing of national experiences, promote the use of PROMs and PREMs, and create meaningful indicators for national and international benchmarking.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 12
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[31]   Routine patient reported outcomes as predictors of psychiatric rehospitalization [J].
Shadmi, Efrat ;
Gelkopf, Marc ;
Garber-Epstein, Paula ;
Baloush-Kleinman, Vered ;
Doudai, Ronit ;
Roe, David .
SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2018, 192 :119-123
[32]   Relationship Between Psychiatric-Service Consumers' and Providers' Goal Concordance and Consumers' Personal Goal Attainment [J].
Shadmi, Efrat ;
Gelkopf, Marc ;
Garber-Epstein, Paula ;
Baloush-Kleinman, Vered ;
Dudai, Ronit ;
Scialom, Silvia Lea ;
Roe, David .
PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2017, 68 (12) :1312-1314
[33]   A validation study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjects [J].
Spinhoven, P ;
Ormel, J ;
Sloekers, PPA ;
Kempen, GIJM ;
Speckens, AEM ;
VanHemert, AM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1997, 27 (02) :363-370
[34]   Estimating the true global burden of mental illness [J].
Vigo, Daniel ;
Thornicroft, Graham ;
Atun, Rifat .
LANCET PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 3 (02) :171-178