Movement patterns in cricket vary by both position and game format

被引:123
作者
Petersen, Carl J. [1 ]
Pyne, David [1 ]
Dawson, Brian [2 ]
Portus, Marc [3 ]
Kellett, Aaron [3 ]
机构
[1] AIS, Dept Physiol, Belconnen, ACT 2616, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, Sch Human Movement & Exercise Sci, Crawley, WA, Australia
[3] Cricket Australia, SSSM Unit, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
Batting; bowling; fielding; limited overs; Twenty20; TIME-MOTION ANALYSIS; FIELD HOCKEY; MATCH-PLAY; DEMANDS; RUGBY;
D O I
10.1080/02640410903348665
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
We compared the movement patterns of cricketers in different playing positions across three formats of cricket (Twenty20, One Day, multi-day matches). Cricket Australia Centre of Excellence cricketers (n = 42) from five positions (batting, fast bowling, spin bowling, wicketkeeping, and fielding) had their movement patterns (walk, jog, run, stride, and sprint) quantified by global positioning system (GPS) technology over two seasons. Marked differences in movement patterns were evident between positions and game formats, with fast bowlers undertaking the greatest workload of any position in cricket. Fast bowlers sprinted twice as often, covered over three times the distance sprinting, with much smaller work-to-recovery ratios than other positions. Fast bowlers during multi-day matches covered 22.6 +/- 4.0 km (mean +/- s) total distance in a day (1.4 +/- 0.9 km in sprinting). In comparison, wicketkeepers rarely sprinted, despite still covering a daily total distance of 16.6 +/- 2.1 km. Overall, One Day and Twenty20 cricket required similar to 50 to 100% more sprinting per hour than multi-day matches. However, multi-day cricket's longer duration resulted in 16-130% more sprinting per day. In summary, the shorter formats (Twenty20 and One Day) are more intensive per unit of time, but multi-day cricket has a greater overall physical load.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 52
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Physical and metabolic demands of training and match-play in the elite football player [J].
Bangsbo, Jens ;
Mohr, Magni ;
Krustrup, Peter .
JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2006, 24 (07) :665-674
[2]   Making Meaningful Inferences About Magnitudes [J].
Batterham, Alan M. ;
Hopkins, William G. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS PHYSIOLOGY AND PERFORMANCE, 2006, 1 (01) :50-57
[3]  
Bishop D C., 2006, International journal of perfomance analysis in sport, V6, P130, DOI [DOI 10.1080/24748668.2006.11868361, 10.1080/24748668.2006.11868361]
[4]   Selected physiological responses during batting in a simulated cricket work bout: A pilot study [J].
Christie, Candice J. ;
Todd, Andrew I. ;
King, Gregory A. .
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT, 2008, 11 (06) :581-584
[5]   A Time-Motion Analysis of International Women's Water Polo Match Play [J].
D'Auria, Shaun ;
Gabbett, Tim .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS PHYSIOLOGY AND PERFORMANCE, 2008, 3 (03) :305-319
[6]   Comparison of training activities and game demands in the Australian Football League [J].
Dawson, B ;
Hopkinson, R ;
Appleby, B ;
Stewart, G ;
Roberts, C .
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT, 2004, 7 (03) :292-301
[7]   Time - motion analysis of professional rugby union players during match-play [J].
Deutsch, M. U. ;
Kearney, G. A. ;
Rehrer, N. J. .
JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2007, 25 (04) :461-472
[8]   Time-motion analysis of Test and One-Day international cricket centuries [J].
Duffield, Rob ;
Drinkwater, Eric J. .
JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2008, 26 (05) :457-464
[9]   Time motion analysis of 2001 and 2002 super 12 rugby [J].
Duthie, G ;
Pyne, D ;
Hooper, S .
JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2005, 23 (05) :523-530
[10]  
FLETCHER JG, 1955, LANCET, V265, P1165