Effect of maturity at harvest for whole-crop barley and oat on dry matter intake, sorting, and digestibility when fed to beef cattle

被引:9
|
作者
Rosser, C. L. [1 ]
Beattie, A. D. [2 ]
Block, H. C. [3 ]
McKinnon, J. J. [1 ]
Lardner, H. A. [1 ,4 ]
Gorka, P. [5 ]
Penner, G. B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Anim & Poultry Sci, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A8, Canada
[2] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Plant Sci, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A8, Canada
[3] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Lacombe, AB T4L 1W1, Canada
[4] Western Beef Dev Ctr, Humbolt, SK S0K 2A0, Canada
[5] Agr Univ Krakow, Dept Anim Nutr & Dietet, Al Mickiewicza 24-28, PL-30059 Krakow, Poland
关键词
barley forage; digestibility; harvest maturity; oat forage; swath grazing; CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION; PROTEIN-SYNTHESIS; CEREAL-GRAINS; DIGESTA-FLOW; ALFALFA; SILAGE; CHROMIUM; FORAGE; YIELD;
D O I
10.2527/jas.2015-0063
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objectives were to evaluate the effect of harvest maturity of whole-crop oat (Study 1) and whole-crop barley (Study 2) on forage intake and sorting, ruminal fermentation, ruminal digestibility, and total tract digestibility when fed to beef heifers. In Study 1, 3 ruminally cannulated heifers (417 +/- 5 kg) were used in a 3 x 3 Latin square design with 24-d periods. Whole-crop oat forage harvested at the late milk (LMILK), hard dough (HD), or ripe (RP) stages was fed for ad libitum intake and heifers were supplemented (1% of BW) with alfalfa pellets, barley grain, canola meal, and a mineral and vitamin pellet. Maturity at harvest for whole-crop oat did not affect (P >= 0.058) forage intake, DE intake, amount of forage refused, ruminal short-chain fatty acid concentration, or digestibility of DM, OM, NDF, and ADF. Ruminal starch digestibility decreased (P < 0.001) from 92.6% at the LMILK stage to 90.0% at the RP stage, with total tract starch digestibility decreasing (P = 0.043) from 95.8% at the LMILK stage to 94.8% at the RP stage. Ruminal CP digestibility was reduced at the HD stage compared with the LMILK and RP stages (P < 0.001). Mean ruminal pH was greatest for the LMILK stage (6.36; P = 0.003) compared with the HD and RP stages (6.30 and 6.28, respectively). In Study 2, 6 ruminally cannulated heifers (273 +/- 16 kg) were used in a replicated 3 x 3 Latin square design with 24-d periods. Dietary treatments included ad libitum access to whole-crop barley harvested at the LMILK, HD, or RP stage and a constant rate (0.8% BW) of supplement containing alfalfa pellets, barley grain, canola meal, and a mineral and vitamin pellet. Dry matter intake, ruminal content mass, and feeding behavior were not affected by harvest maturity (P >= 0.16). There was a decrease in total tract digestibility of DM, OM, and NDF observed at the HD stage compared with the LMILK and RP stages (P <= 0.004). Ruminal NDF digestibility decreased from 69.7% at the LMILK stage to 54.4% at the HD stage and 54.9% at the RP stage (P = 0.001), whereas ruminal ADF digestibility decreased from 70.0% at the LMILK stage to 44.4% at the HD stage and 42.5% at the RP stage (P = 0.002). Minimum and mean ruminal pH were least for the LMILK stage, intermediate at the RP stage, and greatest at the HD stage (P = 0.016 and P = 0.031, respectively). These data suggest that despite reductions in ruminal digestibility of NDF and ADF with advancing maturity, harvesting whole-crop oat and barley forage at the HD and RP stages of maturity did not negatively affect DMI, fermentation characteristics, or DE relative to whole-crop cereal forage harvested at the LMILK stage.
引用
收藏
页码:697 / 708
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Digestibility of whole-crop barley and oat silages in dairy heifers
    Wallsten, J.
    Bertilsson, J.
    Nadeau, E.
    Martinsson, K.
    ANIMAL, 2010, 4 (03) : 432 - 438
  • [2] The effect of additives on palatability, voluntary intake and digestibility of lucerne and whole-crop oat silages
    Borowiec, F
    Zajac, T
    Kowalski, ZM
    Micek, P
    Marcinski, M
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND FEED SCIENCES, 2001, 10 : 345 - 350
  • [3] Effect of inoculants on whole-crop barley silage fermentation and dry matter disappearance in situ
    Hristov, AN
    McAllister, TA
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2002, 80 (02) : 510 - 516
  • [4] EFFECT OF AGE OF CATTLE ON DIGESTIBILITY OF WHOLE BARLEY AND OAT GRAIN
    MORGAN, CA
    CAMPLING, RC
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 1977, 24 (FEB): : 151 - 152
  • [5] Intake, digestibility and rumen characteristics in cattle offered whole-crop wheat or barley silages of contrasting grain to straw ratios
    Walsh, K.
    O'Kiely, P.
    Taweel, H. Z.
    McGee, M.
    Moloney, A. P.
    Boland, T. M.
    ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 148 (2-4) : 192 - 213
  • [6] Protein degradability in the rumen and intestinal digestibility of ensiled whole-crop oat cut at different stages of maturity
    Kowalski, ZM
    Borowiec, F
    Pisulewski, PM
    Micek, P
    Ludwin, J
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND FEED SCIENCES, 2001, 10 : 339 - 344
  • [7] Intake, digestibility, rumen fermentation and performance of beef cattle fed diets based on whole-crop wheat or barley harvested at two cutting heights relative to maize silage or ad libitum concentrates
    Walsh, K.
    O'Kiely, P.
    Moloney, A. P.
    Boland, T. M.
    ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 144 (3-4) : 257 - 278
  • [8] Optimising harvest timing by predicting dry matter content of whole-crop cereals for silage
    de Ruiter, J. M.
    Maley, S.
    Robson, M.
    AGRONOMY NEW ZEALAND, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 34 : 117 - 131
  • [9] Voluntary intake and diet selection by dairy heifers fed ensiled whole-crop barley and oats harvested at different stages of maturity
    Wallsten, Johanna
    Nadeau, Elisatiet
    Bertilsson, Jan
    Martinsson, Jell
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2009, 122 (01) : 94 - 98
  • [10] Digestibility and protein utilization in wethers fed whole-crop barley or grass silages harvested at different maturity stages, with or without protein supplementation
    Nadeau, Elisabet
    de Sousa, Dannylo Oliveira
    Magnusson, Anna
    Hedlund, Susanna
    Richardt, Wolfram
    Norgaard, Peder
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2019, 97 (05) : 2188 - 2201