A comparative study of topology-based pathway enrichment analysis methods

被引:52
作者
Ma, Jing [1 ,2 ]
Shojaie, Ali [3 ]
Michailidis, George [4 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Stat, College Stn, TX 77840 USA
[2] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Publ Hlth Sci Div, Seattle, WA 98107 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
[4] Univ Florida, Dept Stat, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
Pathway enrichment analysis; Pathway topology; Type I error; Power; Differential network biology; PERMUTATION TESTS; GENE SETS; EXPRESSION; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1186/s12859-019-3146-1
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background Pathway enrichment extensively used in the analysis of Omics data for gaining biological insights into the functional roles of pre-defined subsets of genes, proteins and metabolites. A large number of methods have been proposed in the literature for this task. The vast majority of these methods use as input expression levels of the biomolecules under study together with their membership in pathways of interest. The latest generation of pathway enrichment methods also leverages information on the topology of the underlying pathways, which as evidence from their evaluation reveals, lead to improved sensitivity and specificity. Nevertheless, a systematic empirical comparison of such methods is still lacking, making selection of the most suitable method for a specific experimental setting challenging. This comparative study of nine network-based methods for pathway enrichment analysis aims to provide a systematic evaluation of their performance based on three real data sets with different number of features (genes/metabolites) and number of samples. Results The findings highlight both methodological and empirical differences across the nine methods. In particular, certain methods assess pathway enrichment due to differences both across expression levels and in the strength of the interconnectedness of the members of the pathway, while others only leverage differential expression levels. In the more challenging setting involving a metabolomics data set, the results show that methods that utilize both pieces of information (with NetGSA being a prototypical one) exhibit superior statistical power in detecting pathway enrichment. Conclusion The analysis reveals that a number of methods perform equally well when testing large size pathways, which is the case with genomic data. On the other hand, NetGSA that takes into consideration both differential expression of the biomolecules in the pathway, as well as changes in the topology exhibits a superior performance when testing small size pathways, which is usually the case for metabolomics data.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 52 条
[41]   MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (MANOVA) [J].
SMITH, H ;
GNANADESIKAN, R ;
HUGHES, JB .
BIOMETRICS, 1962, 18 (01) :22-&
[42]   Multivariate gene-set testing based on graphical models [J].
Stadler, Nicolas ;
Mukherjee, Sach .
BIOSTATISTICS, 2015, 16 (01) :47-59
[43]   The BioGRID Interaction Database: 2011 update [J].
Stark, Chris ;
Breitkreutz, Bobby-Joe ;
Chatr-aryamontri, Andrew ;
Boucher, Lorrie ;
Oughtred, Rose ;
Livstone, Michael S. ;
Nixon, Julie ;
Van Auken, Kimberly ;
Wang, Xiaodong ;
Shi, Xiaoqi ;
Reguly, Teresa ;
Rust, Jennifer M. ;
Winter, Andrew ;
Dolinski, Kara ;
Tyers, Mike .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2011, 39 :D698-D704
[44]   Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles [J].
Subramanian, A ;
Tamayo, P ;
Mootha, VK ;
Mukherjee, S ;
Ebert, BL ;
Gillette, MA ;
Paulovich, A ;
Pomeroy, SL ;
Golub, TR ;
Lander, ES ;
Mesirov, JP .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2005, 102 (43) :15545-15550
[45]   A novel signaling pathway impact analysis [J].
Tarca, Adi Laurentiu ;
Draghici, Sorin ;
Khatri, Purvesh ;
Hassan, Sonia S. ;
Mittal, Pooja ;
Kim, Jung-sun ;
Kim, Chong Jai ;
Kusanovic, Juan Pedro ;
Romero, Roberto .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2009, 25 (01) :75-82
[46]   Testing for pathway (in)activation by using Gaussian graphical models [J].
van Wieringen, Wessel N. ;
Peeters, Carel F. W. ;
de Menezes, Renee X. ;
van de Wiel, Mark A. .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 2018, 67 (05) :1419-1436
[47]   The Integration of Biological Pathway Knowledge in Cancer Genomics A review of existing computational approaches [J].
Varadan, Vinay ;
Mittal, Prateek ;
Vaske, Charles J. ;
Benz, Stephen C. .
IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, 2012, 29 (01) :35-50
[48]  
Voichita C, 2018, RONTOTOOLS R ONTO TO
[49]   Incorporating gene significance in the impact analysis of signaling pathways [J].
Voichita, Calin ;
Donato, Michele ;
Draghici, Sorin .
2012 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND APPLICATIONS (ICMLA 2012), VOL 1, 2012, :126-131
[50]   Epigenetic Antagonism between Polycomb and SWI/SNF Complexes during Oncogenic Transformation [J].
Wilson, Boris G. ;
Wang, Xi ;
Shen, Xiaohua ;
McKenna, Elizabeth S. ;
Lemieux, Madeleine E. ;
Cho, Yoon-Jae ;
Koellhoffer, Edward C. ;
Pomeroy, Scott L. ;
Orkin, Stuart H. ;
Roberts, Charles W. M. .
CANCER CELL, 2010, 18 (04) :316-328