A massive open online course (MOOC) can be used to teach physiotherapy students about spinal cord injuries: a randomised trial

被引:41
作者
Hossain, Mohammad S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Islam, Md. Shofiqul [2 ,3 ]
Glinsky, Joanne V. [4 ]
Lowe, Rachael
Lowe, Tony
Harvey, Lisa A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Acad Inst, Ctr Rehabil Paralysed, Savar, Bangladesh
[2] Acad Inst, Bangladesh Hlth Profess Inst, Savar, Bangladesh
[3] Ctr Rehabil Paralysed, Savar, Bangladesh
[4] Royal N Shore Hosp, Kolling Inst, John Walsh Ctr Rehabil Res, Sydney Med School Northern, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Rehabilitation; Spinal cord injury; Clinical trials; Methodology;
D O I
10.1016/j.jphys.2014.09.008
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Question: Does a massive open online course (MOOC) based around an online learning module about spinal cord injuries improve knowledge or confidence among physiotherapy students more than if physiotherapy students are left to work through the online learning module at their own pace. Which method of presenting the content leads to greater satisfaction among the students? Study design: Randomised controlled trial with concealed allocation and intention-to-treat analysis. Participants: Forty-eight physiotherapy students in Bangladesh. Intervention: Participants randomised to the control group were instructed to work at their own pace over a 5-week period through a physiotherapy-specific online learning module available at www.elearnSCI.org. Experimental participants were enrolled in a 5-week MOOC. The MOOC involved completing the same online learning module but experimental participants' progress through the module was guided each week and they were provided with the opportunity to engage in online discussion through Facebook. Outcome measures: The primary outcome was knowledge, and the secondary outcomes were perceived confidence to treat people with spinal cord injuries and satisfaction with the learning experience. Results: The mean between-group difference for knowledge was 0.7 points (95% CI -1.3 to 2.6) on a 0 to 20-point scale. The equivalent results for perceived confidence and satisfaction with the learning experience were 0.4 points (95% CI 1.0 to 1.8) and 0.0 points (95% CI -1.1 to 1.2) on a 0 to 10-point scale. Conclusion: The MOOC was no better for students than working at their own pace through an online learning module for increasing knowledge, confidence or satisfaction. However, students in the MOOC group highlighted positive aspects of the course that were unique to their group, such as interacting with students from other countries through the MOOC Facebook group. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Australian Physiotherapy Association.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 27
页数:7
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], KEEPING THEM CLICKIN
  • [2] [Anonymous], J OPEN DISTANCE E LE
  • [3] [Anonymous], LEARNING MEDIA TECHN
  • [4] Connectivism: Its Place in Theory-Informed Research and Innovation in Technology-Enabled Learning
    Bell, Frances
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN OPEN AND DISTRIBUTED LEARNING, 2011, 12 (03): : 98 - 118
  • [5] BIS, 2013, MAT MOOC LIT REV MAS
  • [6] www.elearnSCI.org: a global educational initiative of ISCoS
    Chhabra, H. S.
    Harvey, L. A.
    Muldoon, S.
    Chaudhary, S.
    Arora, M.
    Brown, D. J.
    Biering-Sorensen, F.
    Wyndaele, J. J.
    Charlifue, S.
    Horsewell, J.
    Ducharme, S.
    Green, D.
    Simpson, D.
    Glinsky, J.
    Weerts, E.
    Upadhyay, N.
    Aito, S.
    Wing, P.
    Katoh, S.
    Kovindha, A.
    Krassioukov, A.
    Weeks, C.
    Srikumar, V.
    Reeves, R.
    Siriwardane, C.
    Hasnan, N.
    Kalke, Y. B.
    Lanig, I.
    [J]. SPINAL CORD, 2013, 51 (03) : 176 - 182
  • [7] Downes Stephen., 2007, MEDIA KNOWLEDGE ED E
  • [8] Hoy Matthew B., 2014, Medical Reference Services Quarterly, V33, P85, DOI 10.1080/02763869.2014.866490
  • [9] Kop R., 2008, INT REV RES OPEN DIS, V9, DOI DOI 10.19173/IRRODL.V9I3.523
  • [10] MOOCs: A Systematic Study of the Published Literature 2008-2012
    Liyanagunawardena, Tharindu Rekha
    Adams, Andrew Alexandar
    Williams, Shirley Ann
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN OPEN AND DISTRIBUTED LEARNING, 2013, 14 (03): : 202 - 227