Capacity reconsidered: Interindividual differences in language comprehension and individual alpha frequency

被引:30
作者
Bornkessel, ID
Fiebach, CJ
Friederici, AD
Schlesewsky, M
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Human Cognit & Brain Sci, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Univ Marburg, Jr Res Grp Neurolinguist, D-35032 Marburg, Germany
关键词
language comprehension; individual differences; reading span; individual alpha frequency; ambiguity; verbal working memory capacity;
D O I
10.1027/1618-3169.51.4.279
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The influence of interindividual differences in cognitive mechanisms on language comprehension remains controversial not only due to conflicting experimental findings, but also in view of the difficulty associated with determining which measure should be used in participant classification. Here, we address the latter problem by proposing that an electrophysiological measure, individual alpha frequency (IAF), may be a suitable means of classifying interindividual differences in sentence processing. Interindividual differences in IAF have been shown to correlate with performance on memory tasks and speed of information processing. In two experiments using event-related brain potentials (ERPs), IAF-based participant groups differed systematically with regard to the processing of ambiguous sentences such that the low-IAF group showed a sustained positivity in the ambiguous region, while the high-IAF group did not. These interindividual differences were independent of whether the ambiguity was syntactic (Experiment 1) or sentence-level semantic (Experiment 2). Moreover, they were reliable only when participants were classified according to IAF, but not in classifications based on reading span, speed of processing (reaction time), or accuracy of processing (error rate).
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 289
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, STRUCTURE LONG TERM
[2]   Subject-object ambiguities in German embedded clauses: An across-the-board comparison [J].
Bader, M ;
Meng, M .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 1999, 28 (02) :121-143
[3]  
BORNKESSEL I, IN PRESS COGNITIVE B
[4]  
Caplan D, 1999, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V22, P77
[5]   INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN WORKING MEMORY AND READING [J].
DANEMAN, M ;
CARPENTER, PA .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1980, 19 (04) :450-466
[6]  
FRIEDERICI A. D., 2003, WORD ORDER SCRAMBLIN, P325
[7]   Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses [J].
Friederici, AD ;
Steinhauer, K ;
Mecklinger, A ;
Meyer, M .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 47 (03) :193-221
[8]   THE MECHANISM OF SUPPRESSION - A COMPONENT OF GENERAL COMPREHENSION SKILL [J].
GERNSBACHER, MA ;
FAUST, ME .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1991, 17 (02) :245-262
[9]   Working memory and lexical ambiguity resolution as revealed by ERPs: A difficult case for activation theories [J].
Gunter, TC ;
Wagner, S ;
Friederici, AD .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 15 (05) :643-657
[10]   A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity [J].
Kane, MJ ;
Bleckley, MK ;
Conway, ARA ;
Engle, RW .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2001, 130 (02) :169-183