共 21 条
Midterm Outcomes of Reverse (Anteverting) Periacetabular Osteotomy in Patients With Hip Impingement Secondary to Acetabular Retroversion
被引:41
作者:
Parry, Joshua A.
[1
,2
]
Swann, Russell P.
[1
,2
]
Erickson, Jill A.
[1
,3
]
Peters, Christopher L.
[1
,3
]
Trousdale, Robert T.
[1
,2
]
Sierra, Rafael J.
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Mayo Clin, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Orthoped Surg, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Univ Utah, Dept Orthoped Surg, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词:
acetabular retroversion;
periacetabular osteotomy;
hip dysplasia;
femoroacetabular impingement;
FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT;
DEVELOPMENTAL DYSPLASIA;
OSTEOARTHRITIS;
VERSION;
SIGN;
D O I:
10.1177/0363546515620382
中图分类号:
R826.8 [整形外科学];
R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学];
R726.2 [小儿整形外科学];
R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: There is a paucity of data on the results of reverse (anteverting) periacetabular osteotomy (RPAO) for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) secondary to acetabular retroversion. Purpose: To evaluate the midterm outcomes of RPAO for FAI secondary to acetabular retroversion in those with and without hip dysplasia. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review identified RPAOs performed on patients with acetabular retroversion in isolation or in the setting of dysplasia (lateral center-edge angle [LCEA] 19 degrees). Acetabular retroversion with FAI was diagnosed clinically and radiographically, with a positive crossover and posterior wall signs on pelvic radiographs. Twenty-three patients (30 hips) met the inclusion criteria; 20 hips with isolated retroversion and 10 hips with retroversion and hip dysplasia. The average age at the time of the procedure was 26 years (range, 13-45 years). The average length of follow-up was 5 years (range, 2-19 years). Harris Hip Score (HHS) and radiographs were evaluated preoperatively and at last follow-up. Results: The mean preoperative LCEA was 31 degrees (range, 22 degrees-49 degrees) in the isolated retroversion group and 9 degrees (range, -4 degrees to 17 degrees) in the dysplastic group. Postoperatively, the LCEA in the dysplastic group increased to 35 degrees (range, 15 degrees-46 degrees) (P = .0001). The crossover sign corrected in 55% (11/20) of the isolated retroversion group and 80% (8/10) of the dysplastic group. The acetabular index (mean SD) improved from 1.3 +/- 0.3 to 1.7 +/- 0.6 (P = .0001), indicating improved anteversion. At the latest follow-up, the average HHS in the isolated retroversion group increased from 58 preoperatively (range, 23-77) to 93 (range, 68-100) (P = .0001); the HHS in the dysplastic group improved from 49 (range, 20-74) to 92 (range, 77-100) (P < .0001). Complication rates were similar in both groups. Excluding hardware removal, additional surgeries were performed in 13% (4/30). Conclusion: RPAO performed for FAI in the young patient with isolated acetabular retroversion or retroversion in the setting of dysplasia successfully improved clinical and radiographic results at mid- to long-term follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:672 / 676
页数:5
相关论文