Similar survival of patients with multiple versus single primary melanomas based on Utah Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data (1973-2011)

被引:11
作者
Grossman, Douglas [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Farnham, James M. [3 ]
Hyngstrom, John [2 ,5 ]
Klapperich, Marki E. [7 ]
Secrest, Aaron M. [1 ]
Empey, Sarah [5 ]
Bowen, Glen M. [1 ,5 ]
Wada, David [1 ,5 ]
Andtbacka, Robert H. I. [2 ,5 ]
Grossmann, Kenneth [3 ,5 ]
Bowles, Tawnya L. [2 ]
Cannon-Albright, Lisa A. [3 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Dermatol, Hlth Sci Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[2] Univ Utah, Dept Surg, Hlth Sci Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Univ Utah, Dept Med, Hlth Sci Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[4] Univ Utah, Dept Oncol Sci, Hlth Sci Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[5] Univ Utah, Huntsman Canc Inst, Hlth Sci Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[6] George E Wahlen Dept Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[7] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
melanoma; multiple primary; SEER; survival; RISK-FACTORS; CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL FEATURES; DIAGNOSIS; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaad.2018.02.055
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background: Survival data are mixed comparing patients with multiple primary melanomas (MPM) to those with single primary melanomas (SPM). Objectives: We compared MPM versus SPM patient survival using a matching method that avoids potential biases associated with other analytic approaches. Methods: Records of 14,138 individuals obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry of all melanomas diagnosed or treated in Utah between 1973 and 2011 were reviewed. A single matched control patient was selected randomly from the SPM cohort for each MPM patient, with the restriction that they survived at least as long as the interval between the first and second diagnoses for the matched MPM patient. Results: Survival curves (n=887 for both MPM and SPM groups) without covariates showed a significant survival disadvantage for MPM patients (chi-squared 39.29, P<.001). However, a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model showed no significant survival difference (hazard ratio 1.07, P=.55). Restricting the multivariate analysis to invasive melanomas also showed no significant survival difference (hazard ratio 0.99, P=.96). Limitations: Breslow depth, ulceration status, and specific cause of death were not available for all patients. Conclusions: Patients with MPM had similar survival times as patients with SPM.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 244
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Trends in incidence, survival, and management of uveal melanoma: a population-based study of 7,516 patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1973-2012)
    Mahendraraj, Krishnaraj
    Lau, Christine S. M.
    Lee, Injoon
    Chamberlain, Ronald S.
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 10 : 2113 - 2119
  • [32] Deep learning models for predicting the survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma based on a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database analysis
    Wang, Shoucheng
    Shao, Mingyi
    Fu, Yu
    Zhao, Ruixia
    Xing, Yunfei
    Zhang, Liujie
    Xu, Yang
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [33] Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting overall survival in patients with lower extremity melanoma: based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database
    Ma, Chunrong
    Hao, Li
    Luo, Jiyue
    He, Bin
    Liao, Si
    Wang, Fan
    Fu, Hongyi
    Zhang, Shun
    ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2025, 317 (01)
  • [34] Incidence trends and survival outcomes of penile squamous cell carcinoma: evidence from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results population-based data
    Qi, Feng
    Wei, Xiyi
    Zheng, Yuxiao
    Ren, Xiaohan
    Li, Xiao
    Zhao, Erkang
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (21)
  • [35] Development and validation of nomograms predicting cancer-specific survival of vulvar cancer patients: based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program
    Liu, Jin
    Wang, Mengqiao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2022, 156 (03) : 529 - 538
  • [36] Association of Extent of Local Tumor Invasion and Survival in Patients with Malignant Primary Osseous Spinal Neoplasms from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database
    Mukherjee, Debraj
    Chaichana, Kaisorn L.
    Adogwa, Owoicho
    Gokaslan, Ziya
    Aaronson, Oran
    Cheng, Joseph S.
    McGirt, Matthew J.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2011, 76 (06) : 580 - 585
  • [37] Survival Outcome of Local Excision versus Radical Resection of Colon or Rectal Carcinoma A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Population-Based Study
    Bhangu, Aneel
    Brown, Gina
    Nicholls, R. J.
    Wong, John
    Darzi, Ara
    Tekkis, Paris
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2013, 258 (04) : 563 - 571
  • [38] A prognostic nomogram for the cancer-specific survival of patients with upper-tract urothelial carcinoma based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database
    Li, Chengzhuo
    Yang, Jin
    Xu, Fengshuo
    Han, Didi
    Zheng, Shuai
    Kaaya, Rahel Elishilia
    Wang, Shengpeng
    Lyu, Jun
    BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [39] A population-based study of racial and ethnic differences in survival among women with invasive cervical cancer: Analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data
    Patel, DA
    Barnholtz-Sloan, JS
    Patel, MK
    Malone, JM
    Chuba, PJ
    Schwartz, K
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2005, 97 (02) : 550 - 558
  • [40] A prognostic nomogram for the cancer-specific survival of patients with upper-tract urothelial carcinoma based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database
    Chengzhuo Li
    Jin Yang
    Fengshuo Xu
    Didi Han
    Shuai Zheng
    Rahel Elishilia Kaaya
    Shengpeng Wang
    Jun Lyu
    BMC Cancer, 20