Similar survival of patients with multiple versus single primary melanomas based on Utah Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data (1973-2011)

被引:11
|
作者
Grossman, Douglas [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Farnham, James M. [3 ]
Hyngstrom, John [2 ,5 ]
Klapperich, Marki E. [7 ]
Secrest, Aaron M. [1 ]
Empey, Sarah [5 ]
Bowen, Glen M. [1 ,5 ]
Wada, David [1 ,5 ]
Andtbacka, Robert H. I. [2 ,5 ]
Grossmann, Kenneth [3 ,5 ]
Bowles, Tawnya L. [2 ]
Cannon-Albright, Lisa A. [3 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Dermatol, Hlth Sci Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[2] Univ Utah, Dept Surg, Hlth Sci Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Univ Utah, Dept Med, Hlth Sci Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[4] Univ Utah, Dept Oncol Sci, Hlth Sci Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[5] Univ Utah, Huntsman Canc Inst, Hlth Sci Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[6] George E Wahlen Dept Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[7] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
melanoma; multiple primary; SEER; survival; RISK-FACTORS; CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL FEATURES; DIAGNOSIS; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaad.2018.02.055
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background: Survival data are mixed comparing patients with multiple primary melanomas (MPM) to those with single primary melanomas (SPM). Objectives: We compared MPM versus SPM patient survival using a matching method that avoids potential biases associated with other analytic approaches. Methods: Records of 14,138 individuals obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry of all melanomas diagnosed or treated in Utah between 1973 and 2011 were reviewed. A single matched control patient was selected randomly from the SPM cohort for each MPM patient, with the restriction that they survived at least as long as the interval between the first and second diagnoses for the matched MPM patient. Results: Survival curves (n=887 for both MPM and SPM groups) without covariates showed a significant survival disadvantage for MPM patients (chi-squared 39.29, P<.001). However, a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model showed no significant survival difference (hazard ratio 1.07, P=.55). Restricting the multivariate analysis to invasive melanomas also showed no significant survival difference (hazard ratio 0.99, P=.96). Limitations: Breslow depth, ulceration status, and specific cause of death were not available for all patients. Conclusions: Patients with MPM had similar survival times as patients with SPM.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 244
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Lung Cancer Survival in Younger Patients (&lt;40 Years): Analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program Data
    Bittoni, M.
    Fisher, J.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 13 (10) : S776 - S777
  • [22] NEOADJUVANT RADIATION IS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPROVED SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH RESECTABLE PANCREATIC CANCER: AN ANALYSIS OF DATA FROM THE SURVEILLANCE, EPIDEMIOLOGY, AND END RESULTS (SEER) REGISTRY
    Stessin, Alexander M.
    Meyer, Joshua E.
    Sherr, David L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (04): : 1128 - 1133
  • [23] Nomogram for predicting survival of patients with gastric cancer and multiple primary malignancies: a real-world retrospective analysis using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database
    Mei, Linhang
    Feng, Jie
    Zhao, Lingdan
    Zheng, Xiaokang
    Li, Xiao
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 51 (08)
  • [24] Deep-learning model for predicting the survival of rectal adenocarcinoma patients based on a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis
    Yu, Haohui
    Huang, Tao
    Feng, Bin
    Lyu, Jun
    BMC CANCER, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [25] Prognostic Nomograms to Predict Survival of Patients with Resectable Gallbladder Cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Based Analysis
    Lin, Yan
    Chen, Hua
    Li, Haitao
    Pan, Fan
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2021, 27
  • [26] Deep-learning model for predicting the survival of rectal adenocarcinoma patients based on a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis
    Haohui Yu
    Tao Huang
    Bin Feng
    Jun Lyu
    BMC Cancer, 22
  • [27] Prevalence of breast cancer in ovarian cancer patients and its impact on patient survival: An analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results data
    Zhang, Ni
    Zhang, Wanfang
    Liu, Yu
    Qiu, Hui
    Wu, Qiuji
    TUMORI JOURNAL, 2025, 111 (02): : 164 - 173
  • [28] Nomogram for predicting overall survival in patients with triple-negative apocrine breast cancer: Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-based analysis
    Xu, Yinggang
    Zhang, Weiwei
    He, Jinzhi
    Wang, Ye
    Chen, Rui
    Shi, Wenjie
    Wan, Xinyu
    Shi, Xiaoqing
    Huang, Xiaofeng
    Wang, Jue
    Zha, Xiaoming
    BREAST, 2022, 66 : 8 - 14
  • [29] Association of surgical resection and survival in patients with malignant primary osseous spinal neoplasms from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database
    Mukherjee, Debraj
    Chaichana, Kaisorn L.
    Parker, Scott L.
    Gokaslan, Ziya L.
    McGirt, Matthew J.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 22 (06) : 1375 - 1382
  • [30] Association of surgical resection and survival in patients with malignant primary osseous spinal neoplasms from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database
    Debraj Mukherjee
    Kaisorn L. Chaichana
    Scott L. Parker
    Ziya L. Gokaslan
    Matthew J. McGirt
    European Spine Journal, 2013, 22 : 1375 - 1382