Similar survival of patients with multiple versus single primary melanomas based on Utah Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data (1973-2011)

被引:11
|
作者
Grossman, Douglas [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Farnham, James M. [3 ]
Hyngstrom, John [2 ,5 ]
Klapperich, Marki E. [7 ]
Secrest, Aaron M. [1 ]
Empey, Sarah [5 ]
Bowen, Glen M. [1 ,5 ]
Wada, David [1 ,5 ]
Andtbacka, Robert H. I. [2 ,5 ]
Grossmann, Kenneth [3 ,5 ]
Bowles, Tawnya L. [2 ]
Cannon-Albright, Lisa A. [3 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Dermatol, Hlth Sci Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[2] Univ Utah, Dept Surg, Hlth Sci Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Univ Utah, Dept Med, Hlth Sci Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[4] Univ Utah, Dept Oncol Sci, Hlth Sci Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[5] Univ Utah, Huntsman Canc Inst, Hlth Sci Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[6] George E Wahlen Dept Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[7] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
melanoma; multiple primary; SEER; survival; RISK-FACTORS; CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL FEATURES; DIAGNOSIS; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaad.2018.02.055
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background: Survival data are mixed comparing patients with multiple primary melanomas (MPM) to those with single primary melanomas (SPM). Objectives: We compared MPM versus SPM patient survival using a matching method that avoids potential biases associated with other analytic approaches. Methods: Records of 14,138 individuals obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry of all melanomas diagnosed or treated in Utah between 1973 and 2011 were reviewed. A single matched control patient was selected randomly from the SPM cohort for each MPM patient, with the restriction that they survived at least as long as the interval between the first and second diagnoses for the matched MPM patient. Results: Survival curves (n=887 for both MPM and SPM groups) without covariates showed a significant survival disadvantage for MPM patients (chi-squared 39.29, P<.001). However, a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model showed no significant survival difference (hazard ratio 1.07, P=.55). Restricting the multivariate analysis to invasive melanomas also showed no significant survival difference (hazard ratio 0.99, P=.96). Limitations: Breslow depth, ulceration status, and specific cause of death were not available for all patients. Conclusions: Patients with MPM had similar survival times as patients with SPM.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 244
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Primary malignant neoplasms of the appendix -: A population-based study from the surveillance, epidemiology and end-results program, 1973-1998
    McCusker, ME
    Coté, TR
    Clegg, LX
    Sobin, LH
    CANCER, 2002, 94 (12) : 3307 - 3312
  • [12] Impact of Marital Status on Survival Among Women With Invasive Cervical Cancer: Analysis of Population-Based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Data
    Patel, Mehul K.
    Patel, Divya A.
    Lu, Mei
    Elshaikh, Mohamed A.
    Munkarah, Adnan
    Movsas, Benjamin
    JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE, 2010, 14 (04) : 329 - 338
  • [13] Impact of primary tumor location on the overall survival of patients with stage IV colorectal cancer: a propensity score analysis of data from the surveillance epidemiology and end results program data
    Ye, Hua
    Zheng, Qi
    Dai, Wen-Yu
    Wu, Feng
    Zheng, Cheng
    Chen, Ping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2017, 10 (05): : 8165 - 8173
  • [14] The effect of marital status on survival in late-stage cancer patients: An analysis based on surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) data, in the United States
    Lai, H
    Lai, SH
    Krongrad, A
    Trapido, E
    Page, JB
    McCoy, CB
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 1999, 6 (02) : 150 - 176
  • [15] The effect of marital status on survival in late-stage cancer patients: An analysis based on surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) data, in the United States
    Hong Lai
    Shenghan Lai
    Arnon Krongrad
    Edward Trapido
    J. Bryan Page
    Clyde B. McCoy
    International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 1999, 6 : 150 - 176
  • [16] Primary urethral carcinoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data analysis identifying predictors of cancer-specific survival
    Aleksic, Ilija
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    Daugherty, Michael
    Agarwal, Piyush K.
    Vourganti, Srinivas
    Bratslavsky, Gennady
    UROLOGY ANNALS, 2018, 10 (02) : 170 - 174
  • [17] Deep learning models for predicting the survival of patients with medulloblastoma based on a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis
    Sun, Meng
    Sun, Jikui
    Li, Meng
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [18] A Bayesian network predicting survival of cervical cancer patients-Based on surveillance, epidemiology, and end results
    Liu, Guangcong
    Yang, Zhuo
    Wang, Danbo
    CANCER SCIENCE, 2023, 114 (03) : 1131 - 1141
  • [19] Survival analysis of patients with metastatic osteosarcoma: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results population-based study
    Song, Kehan
    Song, Jian
    Lin, Kaiyuan
    Chen, Feiyan
    Ma, Xiaosheng
    Jiang, Jianyuan
    Li, Feng
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2019, 43 (08) : 1983 - 1991
  • [20] Survival analysis of patients with metastatic osteosarcoma: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results population-based study
    Kehan Song
    Jian Song
    Kaiyuan Lin
    Feiyan Chen
    Xiaosheng Ma
    Jianyuan Jiang
    Feng Li
    International Orthopaedics, 2019, 43 : 1983 - 1991