Contrast examination of central venous access port implanted through internal jugular vein for evaluation of suspected complications

被引:2
作者
Iguchi, Toshihiro [1 ]
Hiraki, Takao [1 ]
Matsui, Yusuke [1 ]
Tomita, Koji [1 ]
Uka, Mayu [1 ]
Umakoshi, Noriyuki [1 ]
Kajita, Soichiro [1 ]
Komaki, Toshiyuki [1 ]
Gobara, Hideo [1 ]
Kanazawa, Susumu [1 ]
机构
[1] Okayama Univ, Dept Radiol, Med Sch, Kita Ku, 2-5-1 Shikata Cho, Okayama 7008558, Japan
关键词
Contrast examination; Central venous access port; Complication; Thrombosis; ONCOLOGY; INSERTION; DEVICES; CANCER;
D O I
10.1007/s11604-021-01142-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose We summarized the findings, diagnosis, and outcomes of cases for which contrast examination of central venous access ports (CV-ports) were attempted to detect complications. Materials and methods Fifty-seven contrast examinations were attempted for 45 patients with 46 CV-ports (median, 162 days after implantation). Contrast examination was performed due to three suspicion catheter fractures or 54 CV-port dysfunctions (combinations of an absence of blood reflux on aspiration and 9 sufficient, 21 insufficient, or 24 impossible drip infusions). Results Contrast examination was successfully performed in 52 cases and revealed 45 normal findings, 5 pericatheter fibrin sheath formations, and 2 partial catheter fractures. In 23 of 45 cases with normal findings, the resistance to injection was initially mild or moderate but resolved after the CV-port was flushed slowly with heparinized saline solution. Subsequent contrast examination demonstrated normal findings. All fibrin sheath formations disappeared after thrombolytic therapy. Five cases could not undergo contrast examination due to high resistance. After contrast examination, nine of 46 CV-ports were removed or exchanged, while the use of the remaining 37 continued. Conclusion Contrast examination of CV-port allowed the assessment of suspected complications and early treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:1103 / 1110
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Percutaneous Endovascular Salvage Techniques for Implanted Venous Access Device Dysfunction [J].
Breault, Stephane ;
Glauser, Frederic ;
Babaker, Malik ;
Doenz, Francesco ;
Qanadli, Salah Dine .
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 38 (03) :642-650
[2]   Fibrin sheaths in central venous port catheters: treatment with low-dose, single injection of urokinase on an outpatient basis [J].
Chang, De-Hua ;
Mammadov, Kamal ;
Hickethier, Tilman ;
Borggrefe, Jan ;
Hellmich, Martin ;
Maintz, David ;
Kabbasch, Christoph .
THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2017, 13 :111-115
[3]   Implantation of central venous ports with catheter insertion via the right internal jugular vein in oncology patients -: single center experience [J].
Charvat, J. ;
Linke, Z. ;
Horaekova, M. ;
Prausova, J. .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2006, 14 (11) :1162-1165
[4]   The Incidence of Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices Insertion and the Associated Abnormalities in Patients With Cancer Revealed in 18F-FDG PET-CT Imaging [J].
Kao, Pan-Fu ;
Weng, Jui-Hung ;
Tyan, Yeu-Sheng ;
Yang, Shun-Fa ;
Tsao, Thomas Chang-Yao .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2017, 24 (12) :1588-1595
[5]   Fracture of totally implanted central venous access devices: a propensity-score-matched comparison of risks for Groshong silicone versus polyurethane catheters [J].
Kojima, Soichi ;
Hiraki, Takao ;
Gobara, Hideo ;
Iguchi, Toshihiro ;
Fujiwara, Hiroyasu ;
Matsui, Yusuke ;
Mitsuhashi, Toshiharu ;
Kanazawa, Susumu .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS, 2016, 17 (06) :535-541
[6]   A Comparison of Outcomes and Complications of Totally Implantable Access Port Through the Internal JugularVeinVersus the Subclavian Vein [J].
Nagasawa, Yoshinobu ;
Shimizu, Tomoharu ;
Sonoda, Hiromichi ;
Mekata, Eiji ;
Wakabayashi, Masato ;
Ohta, Hiroyuki ;
Murata, Satoshi ;
Mori, Tsuyoshi ;
Naka, Shigeyuki ;
Tani, Tohru .
INTERNATIONAL SURGERY, 2014, 99 (02) :182-188
[7]   Ultrasound-Guided Radiological Placement of Central Venous Port via the Subclavian Vein: A Retrospective Analysis of 500 Cases at a Single Institute [J].
Sakamoto, Noriaki ;
Arai, Yasuaki ;
Takeuchi, Yoshito ;
Takahashi, Masahide ;
Tsurusaki, Masakatsu ;
Sugimura, Kazuro .
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2010, 33 (05) :989-994
[8]   Current situation regarding central venous port implantation procedures and complications: a questionnaire-based survey of 11,693 implantations in Japan [J].
Shiono, Masatoshi ;
Takahashi, Shin ;
Takahashi, Masanobu ;
Yamaguchi, Takuhiro ;
Ishioka, Chikashi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 21 (06) :1172-1182
[9]   Intravascular Embolization of Venous Catheter-Causes, Clinical Signs, and Management: A Systematic Review [J].
Surov, Alexey ;
Wienke, Andreas ;
Carter, Justin M. ;
Stoevesandt, Dietrich ;
Behrmann, Curd ;
Spielmann, Rolf-Peter ;
Werdan, Karl ;
Buerke, Michael .
JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 2009, 33 (06) :677-685
[10]   Thromboembolic complications of cancer: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment [J].
Sutherland, DE ;
Weitz, IC ;
Liebman, HA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 2003, 72 (01) :43-52