Scientific response to a cluster of shark bites

被引:13
作者
Barnett, Adam [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fitzpatrick, Richard [1 ,2 ]
Bradley, Michael [2 ,3 ]
Miller, Ingo [2 ,4 ]
Sheaves, Marcus [2 ,3 ]
Chin, Andrew [5 ]
Smith, Bethany [2 ,5 ]
Diedrich, Amy [2 ,5 ]
Yick, Jonah Lee [6 ]
Lubitz, Nicolas [2 ,3 ]
Crook, Kevin [2 ,3 ]
Mattone, Carlo [2 ,3 ]
Bennett, Mike B. [7 ]
Wojtach, Leah [2 ]
Abrantes, Katya [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Biopixel Oceans Fdn, Cairns, Qld, Australia
[2] James Cook Univ, Coll Sci & Engn, Cairns, Qld, Australia
[3] James Cook Univ, Marine Data Technol Hub, Townsville, Qld, Australia
[4] Carl von Ossietzky Univ Oldenburg, Inst Chem & Biol Marine Environm, Environm Biochem, Wilhelmshaven, Germany
[5] James Cook Univ, Coll Sci & Engn, Ctr Sustainable Trop Fisheries & Aquaculture, Townsville, Qld, Australia
[6] Inland Fisheries Serv, New Norfolk, Tas, Australia
[7] Univ Queensland, Sch Biomed Sci, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
关键词
acoustic tracking; human-wildlife conflict; satellite tracking; shark bite; shark provisioning; tourism; PROTECTIVE GILL NETS; CARCHARHINUS-LEUCAS; MOVEMENT PATTERNS; GALEOCERDO-CUVIER; SOUTH-AFRICA; ATTACKS; RESIDENCY; ABUNDANCE; CAUGHT; SIZE;
D O I
10.1002/pan3.10337
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Shark bites are of high public concern globally. Information on shark occurrence and behaviour, and of the effects of human behaviours, can help understand the drivers of shark-human interactions. In Australia, a number of shark bite clusters occurred over the last decade. One of these took place in Cid Harbour the Whitsundays, Queensland, a region for which little was known about the shark community. Here, we describe and evaluate the research in response to that shark bite cluster. Fishing methods, acoustic and satellite tracking, and baited remote underwater video cameras (BRUVs) were used to identify the shark species using Cid Harbour, estimate relative abundance, and describe habitat use and residency. Side-scan sonar and BRUVs were also used to assess prey availability. Recreational users were surveyed to understand human behaviour and their awareness and perceptions of 'Shark Smart' behaviours. This allowed shark occurrence and behaviour to be interpreted in the context of human behaviours in the Harbour. Eleven shark species were identified. Relative abundance was not unusually high, and residency in Cid Harbour was typically low. For example, 79% of acoustically tagged sharks visited the harbour on <10% days at liberty. Shark prey was available year-round. Notably, anchored boats regularly conduct activities that can attract sharks (dumping food scraps, provisioning and cleaning fish). Alone, the methods used in this study had variable success, but combined they provided a large amount of complementary information. Including a social science component in the research response to the shark bite incidents allowed for a more holistic understanding of the Cid Harbour bite incidents. This study did not identify anything unusual about the shark community that could have contributed to the Cid Harbour shark bite cluster. However, the three incidents involved people bitten almost instantly after entering the water, which is unusual and suggests that feeding/attracting sharks to boats could have been a contributor and also that any species capable of biting humans could have been responsible. The eradication of activities that attract sharks to areas where people enter the water may reduce shark bite risk. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
引用
收藏
页码:963 / 982
页数:20
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Coexisting with sharks: a novel, socially acceptable and non-lethal shark mitigation approach
    Adams, Kye R.
    Gibbs, Leah
    Knott, Nathan A.
    Broad, Allison
    Hing, Martin
    Taylor, Matthew D.
    Davis, Andrew R.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [2] Inferring trends and linkages between shark abundance and shark bites on humans for shark-hazard mitigation
    Afonso, Andre S.
    Niella, Yuri V.
    Hazin, Fabio H. V.
    [J]. MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH, 2017, 68 (07) : 1354 - 1365
  • [3] Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS), 2020, SEA WAT TEMP LOGG DA
  • [4] Context Dependence: A Conceptual Approach for Understanding the Habitat Relationships of Coastal Marine Fauna
    Bradley, Michael
    Nagelkerken, Ivan
    Baker, Ronald
    Sheaves, Marcus
    [J]. BIOSCIENCE, 2020, 70 (11) : 986 - 1004
  • [5] Bruce B., 2018, NATL ASSESSMENT STAT
  • [6] Opportunistic Visitors: Long-Term Behavioural Response of Bull Sharks to Food Provisioning in Fiji
    Brunnschweiler, Juerg M.
    Barnett, Adam
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (03):
  • [7] The Drone Revolution of Shark Science: A Review
    Butcher, Paul A.
    Colefax, Andrew P.
    Gorkin, Robert A., III
    Kajiura, Stephen M.
    Lopez, Naima A.
    Mourier, Johann
    Purcell, Cormac R.
    Skomal, Gregory B.
    Tucker, James P.
    Walsh, Andrew J.
    Williamson, Jane E.
    Raoult, Vincent
    [J]. DRONES, 2021, 5 (01) : 1 - 28
  • [8] Beach safety: can drones provide a platform for sighting sharks?
    Butcher, Paul A.
    Piddocke, Toby P.
    Colefax, Andrew P.
    Hoade, Brent
    Peddemors, Victor M.
    Borg, Lauren
    Cullis, Brian R.
    [J]. WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2019, 46 (08) : 701 - 712
  • [9] Calenge C., 2011, Home Range Estimation in R: The adehabitatHR Package.
  • [10] Global shark attack hotspots: Identifying underlying factors behind increased unprovoked shark bite incidence
    Chapman, Blake K.
    McPhee, Daryl
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 133 : 72 - 84