The Effect of Fraud Pentagon Theory on Financial Statements: Empirical Evidence from Indonesia

被引:7
作者
Devi, Putu Nirmala Chandra [1 ]
Widanaputra, Anak Agung Gde Putu [1 ]
Budiasih, I. Gusti Ayu Nyoman [1 ]
Rasmini, Ni Ketut [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Udayana, Fac Econ & Business, Dept Accounting, Jl PB Sudirman, Bali 80232, Indonesia
来源
JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS | 2021年 / 8卷 / 03期
关键词
Financial Economics; Finance; Illegal Behavior;
D O I
10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no3.1163
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study aims to obtain empirical evidence regarding the effect of the fraud pentagon theory on financial statement fraud. The novelty of this study is the use of factor analysis to consolidate the five elements of the fraud pentagon into just one factor, which, to the knowledge of the researcher, no one else has done to research the effect of pentagon fraud on financial statement fraud. This study uses both agency theory and fraud pentagon theory. The population of this study consists of state-owned companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The research period in this study is from 2014 to 2019. The data used in this study is secondary data obtained from the company's annual financial statements. A purposive sampling technique was used to determine the research sample. The selected companies total 20. Factor analysis and simple linear regression analysis method were used as research the methods. Based on the research results, it was found that the fraud pentagon theory had a positive effect on the financial statement fraud of state-owned companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. High level of the pentagon fraud on a company leads to a higher indication of financial statement fraud.
引用
收藏
页码:1163 / 1169
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Akbar T., 2017, International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, V14, P106
  • [2] American Institute Certified Public Accountant, 1998, VISION PROJECT
  • [3] Apriliana S., 2017, Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, V9, P154, DOI DOI 10.15294/JDA.V7I1.4036
  • [4] Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, 2020, REPORT NATIONS 2020
  • [5] Bawekes H. F., 2018, J REGIONAL ACCOUNTIN, V13, P114
  • [6] Beasley M.S., 2000, ACCOUNT HORIZ, V14, P441, DOI [https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2000.14.4.441, DOI 10.2308/ACCH.2000.14.4.441]
  • [7] The effect of alternative fraud model use on auditors' fraud risk judgments
    Boyle, Douglas M.
    DeZoort, F. Todd
    Hermanson, Dana R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2015, 34 (06) : 578 - 596
  • [8] Cressey Donald R., 1953, Other people's money
  • [9] a study of the social psychology of embezzlement
  • [10] Dechow P.M., 1996, Contemporary Accounting Research, V13, P1, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1911-3846.1996.TB00489.X