Decision-making of municipal urban forest managers through the lens of governance

被引:45
作者
Ordonez, Camilo [1 ]
Threlfall, Caragh G. [1 ]
Livesley, Stephen J. [1 ]
Kendal, Dave [2 ]
Fuller, Richard A. [3 ]
Davern, Melanie [4 ,5 ]
van der Ree, Rodney [1 ]
Hochuli, Dieter F. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Fac Sci, SEFS, Burnley Campus,500 Yarra Blvd, Richmond, Vic 3121, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Sch Technol Environm & Design, Hobart, Tas 7000, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Biol Sci, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[4] RMIT Univ, Ctr Urban Res, Hlth Liveable Cities Grp, 124 La Trobe St, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
[5] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Melbourne, Vic 3052, Australia
[6] Univ Sydney, Sch Life & Environm Sci, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Municipal government; Urban planning; Urban greenspace; Urban forest management; Urban forest governance; GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ECOLOGICAL-SYSTEMS; TREE; CLIMATE; CITIES; CITY; STEWARDSHIP; PERSPECTIVE; MELBOURNE;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2019.11.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Awareness of the benefits of urban trees has led many cities to develop ambitious targets to increase tree numbers and canopy cover. Policy instruments that guide the planning of cities recognize the need for new governance arrangements to implement this agenda. Urban forests are greatly influenced by the decisions of municipal managers, but there is currently no clear understanding of how municipal managers find support to implement their decisions via new governance arrangements. To fill this knowledge gap, we collected empirical data through interviews with 23 urban forest municipal managers in 12 local governments in Greater Melbourne and regional Victoria, Australia, and analysed these data using qualitative interpretative methods through a governance lens. The goal of this was to understand the issues and challenges, stakeholders, resources, processes, and rules behind the decision-making of municipal managers. Municipal managers said that urban densification and expansion were making it difficult for them to implement their strategies to increase tree numbers and canopy cover. The coordination of stakeholders was more important for managers to find support to implement their decisions than having a bigger budget. The views of the public or wider community and a municipal government culture of risk aversion were also making it difficult for municipal managers to implement their strategies. Decision-making priorities and processes were not the same across urban centres. Lack of space to grow trees in new developments, excessive tree removal, and public consultation, were ideas more frequently raised in inner urban centres, while urban expansion, increased active use of greenspaces, and lack of data/information about tree assets were concerns for outer and regional centres. Nonetheless, inter-departmental coordination was a common theme shared among all cities. Strengthening coordination processes is an important way for local governments to overcome these barriers and effectively implement their urban forest strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 147
页数:12
相关论文
共 98 条
  • [51] Amenity enhancement and biodiversity conservation in Australian suburbia Moving towards maintaining indigenous plants on private residential land
    Kelly, Andrew H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 6 (1-2) : 91 - 105
  • [52] Drivers of diversity and tree cover in gardens, parks and streetscapes in an Australian city
    Kendal, Dave
    Williams, Nicholas S. G.
    Williams, Kathryn J. H.
    [J]. URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2012, 11 (03) : 257 - 265
  • [53] Harnessing diversity in gardens through individual decision makers
    Kendal, Dave
    Williams, Nicholas S. G.
    Williams, Kathryn J. H.
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2010, 25 (04) : 201 - 202
  • [54] How tree professionals perceive trees and conflicts about trees in Australia's urban forest
    Kirkpatrick, Jamie B.
    Davison, Aidan
    Harwood, Andrew
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2013, 119 : 124 - 130
  • [55] Kiser L., 1982, STRATEGIES POLITICAL, P179
  • [56] Adapting forestry to urban demands - role of communication in urban forestry in Europe
    Konijnendijk, CC
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2000, 52 (2-3) : 89 - 100
  • [57] Konijnendijk Cecil C., 2006, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, V4, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2005.11.003
  • [58] Network and participatory governance in urban forestry: An assessment of examples from selected Slovakian cities
    Kozova, Maria
    Dobsinska, Zuzana
    Pauditsova, Eva
    Tomcikova, Ivana
    Rakytova, Iveta
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2018, 89 : 31 - 41
  • [59] Urban forest governance: Towards a framework for comparing approaches
    Lawrence, Anna
    De Vreese, Rik
    Johnston, Mark
    van den Bosch, Cecil C. Konijnendijk
    Sanesi, Giovanni
    [J]. URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2013, 12 (04) : 464 - 473
  • [60] Environmental governance
    Lemos, Maria Carmen
    Agrawal, Arun
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2006, 31 : 297 - 325