Responses of cetaceans to anthropogenic noise

被引:429
作者
Nowacek, Douglas P. [1 ]
Thorne, Lesley H.
Johnston, David W.
Tyack, Peter L.
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Dept Oceanog, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Marine Lab, Nicholas Sch Environm & Earth Sci, Beaufort, NC 28516 USA
[3] Univ Hawaii, Joint Inst Marine & Atmospher Res, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[4] Woods Hole Oceanog Inst, Dept Biol, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA
关键词
acoustic deterrent; acoustic harassment; behaviour; device; exposure; hearing; man-made; marine mammals; sound;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2907.2007.00104.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
1. Since the last thorough review of the effects of anthropogenic noise on cetaceans in 1995, a substantial number of research reports has been published and our ability to document response(s), or the lack thereof, has improved. While rigorous measurement of responses remains important, there is an increased need to interpret observed actions in the context of population-level consequences and acceptable exposure levels. There has been little change in the sources of noise, with the notable addition of noise from wind farms and novel acoustic deterrent and harassment devices (ADDs/AHDs). Overall, the noise sources of primary concern are ships, seismic exploration, sonars of all types and some AHDs. 2. Responses to noise fall into three main categories: behavioural, acoustic and physiological. We reviewed reports of the first two exhaustively, reviewing all peer-reviewed literature since 1995 with exceptions only for emerging subjects. Furthermore, we fully review only those studies for which received sound characteristics (amplitude and frequency) are reported, because interpreting what elicits responses or lack of responses is impossible without this exposure information. Behavioural responses include changes in surfacing, diving and heading patterns. Acoustic responses include changes in type or timing of vocalizations relative to the noise source. For physiological responses we address the issues of auditory threshold shifts and 'stress', albeit in a more limited capacity; a thorough review of physiological consequences is beyond the scope of this paper. 3. Overall, we found significant progress in the documentation of responses of cetaceans to various noise sources. However, we are concerned about the lack of investigation into the potential effects of prevalent noise sources such as commercial sonars, depth finders and fisheries acoustics gear. Furthermore, we were surprised at the number of experiments that failed to report any information about the sound exposure experienced by their experimental subjects. Conducting experiments with cetaceans is challenging and opportunities are limited, so use of the latter should be maximized and include rigorous measurements and or modelling of exposure.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 115
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Managing Anthropogenic Underwater Noise in the Northwest Territories, Canada
    Hanna, Bruce W.
    Cott, Peter A.
    Joynt, Amanda A.
    Harwood, Lois
    EFFECTS OF NOISE ON AQUATIC LIFE, 2012, 730 : 625 - 627
  • [42] A Systematic Review of Anthropogenic Noise Impact on Avian Species
    Engel, Margret S.
    Young, Robert J.
    Davies, William J.
    Waddington, David
    Wood, Michael D.
    CURRENT POLLUTION REPORTS, 2024, 10 (04): : 684 - 709
  • [43] Modeling anthropogenic noise impacts on animals in natural areas
    Keyel, Alexander C.
    Reed, Sarah E.
    Nuessly, Kathryn
    Cinto-Mejia, Elizeth
    Barber, Jesse R.
    Wittemyer, George
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2018, 180 : 76 - 84
  • [44] Acoustic risk balancing by marine mammals: anthropogenic noise can influence the foraging decisions by seals
    Hastie, Gordon D.
    Lepper, Paul
    McKnight, J. Chris
    Milne, Ryan
    Russell, Debbie J. F.
    Thompson, David
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2021, 58 (09) : 1854 - 1863
  • [45] Widespread spatial and temporal extent of anthropogenic noise across the northeastern Gulf of Mexico shelf ecosystem
    Estabrook, Bobbi J.
    Ponirakis, Dimitri W.
    Clark, Christopher W.
    Rice, Aaron N.
    ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH, 2016, 30 : 267 - 282
  • [46] Anthropogenic Noise Aggravates the Toxicity of Cadmium on Some Physiological Characteristics of the Blood Clam Tegillarca granosa
    Shi, Wei
    Han, Yu
    Guan, Xiaofan
    Rong, Jiahuan
    Du, Xueying
    Zha, Shanjie
    Tang, Yu
    Liu, Guangxu
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [47] Underwater Anthropogenic Noise Pollution Assessment in Shallow Waters on the South-Eastern Coast of Spain
    Javier Rodrigo, Francisco
    Ramis, Jaime
    Carbajo, Jesus
    Poveda, Pedro
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (09)
  • [48] Three-dimensional anthropogenic underwater noise modeling in an Arctic fjord for acoustic risk assessment
    Richard, Gaetan
    Mathias, Delphine
    Collin, Jeremy
    Chauvaud, Laurent
    Bonnel, Julien
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2023, 187
  • [49] Comparative effects of urban development and anthropogenic noise on bird songs
    Dowling, J. L.
    Luther, D. A.
    Marra, P. P.
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2012, 23 (01) : 201 - 209
  • [50] Integrating techniques: a review of the effects of anthropogenic noise on freshwater fish
    Mickle, Megan F.
    Higgs, Dennis M.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2018, 75 (09) : 1534 - 1541