Responses of cetaceans to anthropogenic noise

被引:429
|
作者
Nowacek, Douglas P. [1 ]
Thorne, Lesley H.
Johnston, David W.
Tyack, Peter L.
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Dept Oceanog, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Marine Lab, Nicholas Sch Environm & Earth Sci, Beaufort, NC 28516 USA
[3] Univ Hawaii, Joint Inst Marine & Atmospher Res, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[4] Woods Hole Oceanog Inst, Dept Biol, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA
关键词
acoustic deterrent; acoustic harassment; behaviour; device; exposure; hearing; man-made; marine mammals; sound;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2907.2007.00104.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
1. Since the last thorough review of the effects of anthropogenic noise on cetaceans in 1995, a substantial number of research reports has been published and our ability to document response(s), or the lack thereof, has improved. While rigorous measurement of responses remains important, there is an increased need to interpret observed actions in the context of population-level consequences and acceptable exposure levels. There has been little change in the sources of noise, with the notable addition of noise from wind farms and novel acoustic deterrent and harassment devices (ADDs/AHDs). Overall, the noise sources of primary concern are ships, seismic exploration, sonars of all types and some AHDs. 2. Responses to noise fall into three main categories: behavioural, acoustic and physiological. We reviewed reports of the first two exhaustively, reviewing all peer-reviewed literature since 1995 with exceptions only for emerging subjects. Furthermore, we fully review only those studies for which received sound characteristics (amplitude and frequency) are reported, because interpreting what elicits responses or lack of responses is impossible without this exposure information. Behavioural responses include changes in surfacing, diving and heading patterns. Acoustic responses include changes in type or timing of vocalizations relative to the noise source. For physiological responses we address the issues of auditory threshold shifts and 'stress', albeit in a more limited capacity; a thorough review of physiological consequences is beyond the scope of this paper. 3. Overall, we found significant progress in the documentation of responses of cetaceans to various noise sources. However, we are concerned about the lack of investigation into the potential effects of prevalent noise sources such as commercial sonars, depth finders and fisheries acoustics gear. Furthermore, we were surprised at the number of experiments that failed to report any information about the sound exposure experienced by their experimental subjects. Conducting experiments with cetaceans is challenging and opportunities are limited, so use of the latter should be maximized and include rigorous measurements and or modelling of exposure.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 115
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Stress response to anthropogenic noise in Atlantic cod Gadus morhua L.
    Sierra-Flores, Rogelio
    Atack, Tim
    Migaud, Herve
    Davie, Andrew
    AQUACULTURAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 67 : 67 - 76
  • [32] Using dose-response functions to improve calculations of the impact of anthropogenic noise
    Tyack, Peter L.
    Thomas, Len
    AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2019, 29 : 242 - 253
  • [33] Life history consequences of developing in anthropogenic noise
    Gurule-Small, Gabrielle A.
    Tinghitella, Robin M.
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2019, 25 (06) : 1957 - 1966
  • [34] Interspecific variation in the response of fish to anthropogenic noise
    Stasso, Jacob J.
    Pieniazek, Rachel H.
    Higgs, Dennis M.
    FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (01) : 25 - 32
  • [35] Anthropogenic noise disrupts acoustic cues for recruitment
    Williams, Brittany R.
    McAfee, Dominic
    Connell, Sean D.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 291 (2027)
  • [36] Developmental experience with anthropogenic noise hinders adult mate location in an acoustically signalling invertebrate
    Gurule-Small, Gabrielle A.
    Tinghitella, Robin M.
    BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2018, 14 (02)
  • [37] Anthropogenic noise does not strengthen multiple-predator effects in a freshwater invasive fish
    Rojas, Emilie
    Prosnier, Loic
    Pradeau, Aurelie
    Boyer, Nicolas
    Medoc, Vincent
    JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY, 2023, 102 (06) : 1470 - 1480
  • [38] Different profiles of naturally produced and anthropogenic organohalogens in the livers of cetaceans from the Sea of Japan and the North Pacific Ocean
    Fujii, Yukiko
    Kato, Yoshihisa
    Kozai, Mai
    Matsuishi, Takashi
    Harada, Kouji H.
    Koizumi, Akio
    Kimura, Osamu
    Endo, Tetsuya
    Haraguchi, Koichi
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2018, 136 : 230 - 242
  • [39] Non-auditory Effects of Anthropogenic Noise on Animals
    Zou, Jian-Wen
    Jin, Bao-Ling
    Chen, Qi-Cai
    Fu, Zi-Ying
    PROGRESS IN BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS, 2023, 50 (06) : 1296 - 1307
  • [40] The importance of invertebrates when considering the impacts of anthropogenic noise
    Morley, Erica L.
    Jones, Gareth
    Radford, Andrew N.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 281 (1776)