Responses of cetaceans to anthropogenic noise

被引:429
|
作者
Nowacek, Douglas P. [1 ]
Thorne, Lesley H.
Johnston, David W.
Tyack, Peter L.
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Dept Oceanog, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Marine Lab, Nicholas Sch Environm & Earth Sci, Beaufort, NC 28516 USA
[3] Univ Hawaii, Joint Inst Marine & Atmospher Res, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[4] Woods Hole Oceanog Inst, Dept Biol, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA
关键词
acoustic deterrent; acoustic harassment; behaviour; device; exposure; hearing; man-made; marine mammals; sound;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2907.2007.00104.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
1. Since the last thorough review of the effects of anthropogenic noise on cetaceans in 1995, a substantial number of research reports has been published and our ability to document response(s), or the lack thereof, has improved. While rigorous measurement of responses remains important, there is an increased need to interpret observed actions in the context of population-level consequences and acceptable exposure levels. There has been little change in the sources of noise, with the notable addition of noise from wind farms and novel acoustic deterrent and harassment devices (ADDs/AHDs). Overall, the noise sources of primary concern are ships, seismic exploration, sonars of all types and some AHDs. 2. Responses to noise fall into three main categories: behavioural, acoustic and physiological. We reviewed reports of the first two exhaustively, reviewing all peer-reviewed literature since 1995 with exceptions only for emerging subjects. Furthermore, we fully review only those studies for which received sound characteristics (amplitude and frequency) are reported, because interpreting what elicits responses or lack of responses is impossible without this exposure information. Behavioural responses include changes in surfacing, diving and heading patterns. Acoustic responses include changes in type or timing of vocalizations relative to the noise source. For physiological responses we address the issues of auditory threshold shifts and 'stress', albeit in a more limited capacity; a thorough review of physiological consequences is beyond the scope of this paper. 3. Overall, we found significant progress in the documentation of responses of cetaceans to various noise sources. However, we are concerned about the lack of investigation into the potential effects of prevalent noise sources such as commercial sonars, depth finders and fisheries acoustics gear. Furthermore, we were surprised at the number of experiments that failed to report any information about the sound exposure experienced by their experimental subjects. Conducting experiments with cetaceans is challenging and opportunities are limited, so use of the latter should be maximized and include rigorous measurements and or modelling of exposure.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 115
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effects of anthropogenic noise on anuran amphibians
    Zaffaroni-Caorsi, Valentina
    Both, Camila
    Marquez, Rafael
    Llusia, Diego
    Narins, Peter
    Debon, Marina
    Borges-Martins, Marcio
    BIOACOUSTICS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SOUND AND ITS RECORDING, 2023, 32 (01): : 90 - 120
  • [22] Experimental field studies to measure behavioral responses of cetaceans to sonar
    Southall, Brandon L.
    Nowacek, Douglas P.
    Miller, Patrick J. O.
    Tyack, Peter L.
    ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH, 2016, 31 : 293 - 315
  • [23] Assessing the responses of coastal cetaceans to the construction of offshore wind turbines
    Thompson, Paul M.
    Lusseau, David
    Barton, Tim
    Simmons, Dave
    Rusin, Jan
    Bailey, Helen
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2010, 60 (08) : 1200 - 1208
  • [24] Anthropogenic Contaminants and Histopathological Findings in Stranded Cetaceans in the Southeastern United States, 2012-2018
    Page-Karjian, Annie
    Lo, Catherine F.
    Ritchie, Branson
    Harms, Craig A.
    Rotstein, David S.
    Han, Sushan
    Hassan, Sayed M.
    Lehner, Andreas F.
    Buchweitz, John P.
    Thayer, Victoria G.
    Sullivan, Jill M.
    Christiansen, Emily F.
    Perrault, Justin R.
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2020, 7
  • [25] Anthropogenic (PBDE) and naturally-produced (MeO-PBDE) brominated compounds in cetaceans - A review
    Alonso, Mariana B.
    Azevedo, Alexandre
    Torres, Joao Paulo M.
    Dorneles, Paulo R.
    Eljarrat, Ethel
    Barcelo, Damia
    Lailson-Brito, Jose, Jr.
    Maim, Olaf
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 481 : 619 - 634
  • [26] Anthropogenic noise causes body malformations and delays development in marine larvae
    Aguilar de Soto, Natacha
    Delorme, Natali
    Atkins, John
    Howard, Sunkita
    Williams, James
    Johnson, Mark
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2013, 3
  • [27] Effects of Industrial Noise on Physiological Responses
    Masullo, Massimiliano
    Toma, Roxana Adina
    Maffei, Luigi
    ACOUSTICS, 2022, 4 (03): : 733 - 745
  • [28] Stuck in a corner: Anthropogenic noise threatens narwhals in their once pristine Arctic habitat
    Tervo, Outi M.
    Blackwell, Susanna B.
    Ditlevsen, Susanne
    Garde, Eva
    Hansen, Rikke G.
    Samson, Adeline L.
    Conrad, Alexander S.
    Heide-Jorgensen, Mads Peter
    SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2023, 9 (30)
  • [29] Mussel Byssal Attachment Weakened by Anthropogenic Noise
    Zhao, Xinguo
    Sun, Shuge
    Shi, Wei
    Sun, Xuemei
    Zhang, Yan
    Zhu, Lin
    Sui, Qi
    Xia, Bin
    Qu, Keming
    Chen, Bijuan
    Liu, Guangxu
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2021, 8
  • [30] Marine invertebrate anthropogenic noise research-Trends in methods and future directions
    Wale, M. A.
    Briers, R. A.
    Diele, K.
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2021, 173