Responses of cetaceans to anthropogenic noise

被引:429
|
作者
Nowacek, Douglas P. [1 ]
Thorne, Lesley H.
Johnston, David W.
Tyack, Peter L.
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Dept Oceanog, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Marine Lab, Nicholas Sch Environm & Earth Sci, Beaufort, NC 28516 USA
[3] Univ Hawaii, Joint Inst Marine & Atmospher Res, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[4] Woods Hole Oceanog Inst, Dept Biol, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA
关键词
acoustic deterrent; acoustic harassment; behaviour; device; exposure; hearing; man-made; marine mammals; sound;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2907.2007.00104.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
1. Since the last thorough review of the effects of anthropogenic noise on cetaceans in 1995, a substantial number of research reports has been published and our ability to document response(s), or the lack thereof, has improved. While rigorous measurement of responses remains important, there is an increased need to interpret observed actions in the context of population-level consequences and acceptable exposure levels. There has been little change in the sources of noise, with the notable addition of noise from wind farms and novel acoustic deterrent and harassment devices (ADDs/AHDs). Overall, the noise sources of primary concern are ships, seismic exploration, sonars of all types and some AHDs. 2. Responses to noise fall into three main categories: behavioural, acoustic and physiological. We reviewed reports of the first two exhaustively, reviewing all peer-reviewed literature since 1995 with exceptions only for emerging subjects. Furthermore, we fully review only those studies for which received sound characteristics (amplitude and frequency) are reported, because interpreting what elicits responses or lack of responses is impossible without this exposure information. Behavioural responses include changes in surfacing, diving and heading patterns. Acoustic responses include changes in type or timing of vocalizations relative to the noise source. For physiological responses we address the issues of auditory threshold shifts and 'stress', albeit in a more limited capacity; a thorough review of physiological consequences is beyond the scope of this paper. 3. Overall, we found significant progress in the documentation of responses of cetaceans to various noise sources. However, we are concerned about the lack of investigation into the potential effects of prevalent noise sources such as commercial sonars, depth finders and fisheries acoustics gear. Furthermore, we were surprised at the number of experiments that failed to report any information about the sound exposure experienced by their experimental subjects. Conducting experiments with cetaceans is challenging and opportunities are limited, so use of the latter should be maximized and include rigorous measurements and or modelling of exposure.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 115
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Behavioral responses to predatory sounds predict sensitivity of cetaceans to anthropogenic noise within a soundscape of fear
    Miller, Patrick J. O.
    Isojunno, Saana
    Siegal, Eilidh
    Lam, Frans-Peter A.
    Kvadsheim, Petter H.
    Cure, Charlotte
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2022, 119 (13)
  • [2] The impacts of anthropogenic ocean noise on cetaceans and implications for management
    Weilgart, L. S.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2007, 85 (11) : 1091 - 1116
  • [3] Condition-dependent physiological and behavioural responses to anthropogenic noise
    Purser, Julia
    Bruintjes, Rick
    Simpson, Stephen D.
    Radford, Andrew N.
    PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2016, 155 : 157 - 161
  • [4] Anthropogenic underwater noise: A review on physiological and molecular responses of marine biota
    El-Dairi, Rami
    Outinen, Okko
    Kankaanpa, Harri
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2024, 199
  • [5] The effects of anthropogenic noise on cetaceans in Brazil: the need to consider recent scientific advances in environmental licensing
    Soares Pires, Ana Luiza Mello
    Maciel, Israel de Sa
    dos Santos Alves, Maria Alice
    Tardin, Rodrigo Hipolito
    JOURNAL OF COASTAL CONSERVATION, 2021, 25 (04)
  • [6] From distraction to habituation: Ecological and behavioural responses of invasive fish to anthropogenic noise
    Rojas, Emilie
    Thevenin, Simon
    Montes, Gabriella
    Boyer, Nicolas
    Medoc, Vincent
    FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2021, 66 (08) : 1606 - 1618
  • [7] Anthropogenic noise predicts sea turtle behavioural responses
    Diaz, Macarena Parra
    Kunc, Hansjoerg P.
    Houghton, Jonathan D. R.
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2024, 198
  • [8] Beyond a Simple Effect: Variable and Changing Responses to Anthropogenic Noise
    Radford, Andrew N.
    Purser, Julia
    Bruintjes, Rick
    Voellmy, Irene K.
    Everley, Kirsty A.
    Wale, Matthew A.
    Holles, Sophie
    Simpson, Stephen D.
    EFFECTS OF NOISE ON AQUATIC LIFE II, 2016, 875 : 901 - 907
  • [9] Causes and consequences of intraspecific variation in animal responses to anthropogenic noise
    Harding, Harry R.
    Gordon, Timothy A. C.
    Eastcott, Emma
    Simpson, Stephen D.
    Radford, Andrew N.
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2019, 30 (06) : 1501 - 1511
  • [10] Anthropogenic noise alters dwarf mongoose responses to heterospecific alarm calls
    Morris-Drake, Amy
    Bracken, Anna M.
    Kern, Julie M.
    Radford, Andrew N.
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2017, 223 : 476 - 483