Direct-to-vial comparison of a new liquid-based cytology system, Liqui-PREP™ versus the conventional pap smear

被引:16
作者
Park, Joonseok
Jung, Eun-Ha
Kim, Chanok
Choi, Young Hee
机构
[1] EONE Reference Lab, Dept Clin Pathol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] EONE Reference Lab, Dept Cytopathol, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
papanicolaou smear; cervical cancer; mass screening; liquid-based cytology; Liqui-PREP;
D O I
10.1002/dc.20665
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The objective of the study was to assess the clinical utility of a liquid-based cytology system on cervicovaginal screening it? a clinical commercial laboratory. Twenty-six thousand, one hundred and seventy eight cervicovaginal specimens were prepared by the Liqui-PREP (TM) (LGM International Inc., Ft. Lauderdale, FL) with a direct-to-vial comparison to 218,548 cases of the conventional direct smear front August 2005 through December 2005. Biopsy data was obtained to confirm the sensitivity for each method. Liqui-PREP (TM) showed a marked increase in HSIL+ detection compared to the conventional smear (P = 0.001). The rate of LSIL and AGC detection was higher with Liqui-PREPTm (P = 0.001 for both). The percentage of ASCUS specimens was higher than with conventional smear due to cleaner slides and easier detection of suspicious cells. The WNL rate was lower for LiquiPREPTM (P = 0.001) consistent with increased HSIL+ and ASCUS. The unsatisfactory rate was lower for Liqui-PREPTm (P = 0.017). The histological predictive value of Liqui-PREP (TM) was slightly higher than the conventional smear (94.1% versus 89.9%). The Liqui-PREP (TM) system similar to other reported LBC technologies shows an increased detection of squamous intraepithelial lesions, and gives higher-quality slides for interpretation than the conventional smear. Histological results confirm that this increase in cytological findings are clinically significant. LGM's new LBC technology is a more sensitive screening tool when compared with the conventional smear.
引用
收藏
页码:488 / 492
页数:5
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Multicenter masked evaluation of AutoCyte PREP thin layers with matched conventional smears - Including initial biopsy results [J].
Bishop, JW ;
Bigner, SH ;
Colgan, TJ ;
Husain, M ;
Howell, LP ;
McIntosh, KM ;
Taylor, DA ;
Sadeghi, MH .
ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 1998, 42 (01) :189-197
[2]  
BRIGGS R M, 1979, Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey, V34, P70, DOI 10.1097/00006254-197901010-00027
[3]  
CHISTOPHERGEN WM, 1976, CANCER, V38, P1357
[4]   ESTIMATION OF SCREENING ERROR RATE FROM OBSERVED DETECTION RATES IN REPEATED CERVICAL CYTOLOGY [J].
COPPLESON, LW ;
BROWN, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1974, 119 (07) :953-958
[5]  
CRAMER DW, 1974, CANCER, V34, P2018, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197412)34:6<2018::AID-CNCR2820340621>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-B
[7]   ATYPICAL SQUAMOUS CELLS OF UNDETERMINED SIGNIFICANCE - INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON AND QUALITY ASSURANCE MONITORS [J].
DAVEY, DD ;
NARYSHKIN, S ;
NIELSEN, ML ;
KLINE, TS .
DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 1994, 11 (04) :390-396
[8]  
DICKINSON L E, 1975, Gynecologic Oncology, V3, P1, DOI 10.1016/0090-8258(75)90001-3
[9]   Comparison of the SurePath™ liquid-based Papanicolaou smear with the conventional Papanicolaou smear in a multisite direct-to-vial study [J].
Fremont-Smith, M ;
Marino, J ;
Griffin, B ;
Spencer, L ;
Bolick, D .
CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2004, 102 (05) :269-279
[10]  
Frost J K, 1969, Obstet Gynecol Surv, V24, P893, DOI 10.1097/00006254-196907001-00019