The making of evidence-informed health policy in Cambodia: knowledge, institutions and processes

被引:11
|
作者
Liverani, Marco [1 ]
Chheng, Kannarath [2 ]
Parkhurst, Justin [3 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Global Hlth & Dev, London, England
[2] Natl Inst Publ Hlth, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
[3] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, London, England
来源
BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH | 2018年 / 3卷 / 03期
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT; TRANSLATION PLATFORM; CAPACITY; PROJECTS; NIGERIA; LESSONS; HISTORY;
D O I
10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000652
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction In global health discussions, there have been widespread calls for health policy and programme implementation to be informed by the best available evidence. However, recommendations in the literature on knowledge translation are often decontextualised, with little attention to the local systems of institutions, structures and practices which can direct the production of evidence and shape whether or how it informs health decisions. This article explores these issues in the country setting of Cambodia, where the Ministry of Health has explicitly championed the language of evidence-based approaches to policy and planning. Methods Research for this paper combined multiple sources and material, including in-depth interviews with key informants in Phnom Penh and the analysis of documentary material and publications. Data collection and analysis focused on two key domains in evidence advisory systems: domestic capacities to generate health policy-relevant evidence and institutional mechanisms to monitor, evaluate and incorporate evidence in the policy process. Results We identified a number of structural arrangements that may increasingly work to facilitate the supply of health-related data and information, and their use to inform policy and planning. However, other trends and features appear to be more problematic, including gaps between research and public health priorities in the country, the fragmented nature of research activities and information systems, the lack of a national policy to support and guide the production and use of evidence for health policy, and challenges to the use of evidence for intersectoral policy-making. Conclusions In Cambodia, as in other low/middle-income countries, continued investments to increase the supply and quality of health data and information are needed, but greater attention should be paid to the enabling institutional environment to ensure relevance of health research products and effective knowledge management.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Domains and processes for institutionalizing evidence-informed health policy-making: a critical interpretive synthesis
    Kuchenmueller, Tanja
    Boeira, Laura
    Oliver, Sandy
    Moat, Kaelan
    El-Jardali, Fadi
    Barreto, Jorge
    Lavis, John
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2022, 20 (01)
  • [2] Policy options to increase motivation for improving evidence-informed health policy-making in Iran
    Sajadi, Haniye Sadat
    Majdzadeh, Reza
    Ehsani-Chimeh, Elham
    Yazdizadeh, Bahareh
    Nikooee, Sima
    Pourabbasi, Ata
    Lavis, John
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [3] Toward More "Evidence-Informed" Policy Making?
    Head, Brian W.
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2016, 76 (03) : 472 - U22
  • [4] Building a knowledge translation platform in Malawi to support evidence-informed health policy
    Berman, Joshua
    Mitambo, Collins
    Matanje-Mwagomba, Beatrice
    Khan, Shiraz
    Kachimanga, Chiyembekezo
    Wroe, Emily
    Mwape, Lonia
    van Oosterhout, Joep J.
    Chindebvu, Getrude
    van Schoor, Vanessa
    Ritchie, Lisa M. Puchalski
    Panisset, Ulysses
    Kathyola, Damson
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2015, 13
  • [5] Development of measurable indicators to enhance public health evidence-informed policy-making
    Tudisca, Valentina
    Valente, Adriana
    Castellani, Tommaso
    Stahl, Timo
    Sandu, Petru
    Dulf, Diana
    Spitters, Hilde
    Van de Goor, Ien
    Radl-Karimi, Christina
    Syed, Mohamed Ahmed
    Loncarevic, Natasa
    Lau, Cathrine Juel
    Roelofs, Susan
    Bertram, Maja
    Edwards, Nancy
    Aro, Arja R.
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2018, 16
  • [6] Individual and institutional capacity-building for evidence-informed health policy-making in Iran: a mix of local and global evidence
    Doshmangir, Leila
    Mostafavi, Hakimeh
    Behzadifar, Masoud
    Yazdizadeh, Bahareh
    Sajadi, Haniye Sadat
    Hasanpoor, Edris
    Mahdavi, Mahdi
    Majdzadeh, Reza
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2022, 20 (01)
  • [7] Tools to support evidence-informed public health decision making
    Yost, Jennifer
    Dobbins, Maureen
    Traynor, Robyn
    DeCorby, Kara
    Workentine, Stephanie
    Greco, Lori
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 14
  • [8] The Use of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Benefit Package Design in Kazakhstan
    Oortwijn, Wija
    Surgey, Gavin
    Novakovic, Tanja
    Baltussen, Rob
    Kosherbayeva, Lyazzat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (18)
  • [9] The development of ORACLe: a measure of an organisation's capacity to engage in evidence-informed health policy
    Makkar, Steve R.
    Turner, Tari
    Williamson, Anna
    Louviere, Jordan
    Redman, Sally
    Haynes, Abby
    Green, Sally
    Brennan, Sue
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2016, 14
  • [10] The development of ORACLe: a measure of an organisation’s capacity to engage in evidence-informed health policy
    Steve R Makkar
    Tari Turner
    Anna Williamson
    Jordan Louviere
    Sally Redman
    Abby Haynes
    Sally Green
    Sue Brennan
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 14