Why do some participants in colorectal cancer screening choose not to undergo colonoscopy following a positive test result? A qualitative study

被引:22
作者
Bie, Anne Katrine Lykke [1 ]
Brodersen, John [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Ctr Res & Educ Gen Practice, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Ctr Res & Educ Gen Practice, Primary Hlth Care Res Unit, Copenhagen, Zealand Region, Denmark
关键词
Colorectal neoplasms; mass screening; cancer screening test; colonoscopy; qualitative research; BARRIERS; PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.1080/02813432.2018.1487520
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Our aim was to investigate why participants opted out of colonoscopy following a positive screening result for colorectal cancer. Design: Semi-structured, qualitative, single interviews. We audio-recorded and transcribed all interviews verbatim and used Strauss and Corbin's concept of open, axial, and selective coding to identify the main categories shared across all interviews. These formed the basis of our findings. Setting: A Danish national colorectal cancer screening programme. Subjects: Single interviews with 13 participants who declined to have a colonoscopy. Main outcome measures: Reasons to decline colonoscopy after positive screening test. Results: Participants gave 42 different reasons for deciding not to have a colonoscopy and we coded them into nine main categories; Practical barriers, Discomfort of the examination, Personal integrity, Multimorbidity, Feeling healthy, Not having the energy, Belief that cancer is not present, Risk of complications, and Distrust in the accuracy of the iFOBT. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that some practical barriers could be quite easily addressed, by offering the participants alternative management and procdures.
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 271
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], NORDCAN CANC INCIDEN
[2]  
Bo ZM, 2010, J CLIN ONCOL C, V28
[3]   Reasons for Participation and Nonparticipation in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Trial of Colonoscopy and CT Colonography [J].
de Wijkerslooth, Thomas R. ;
de Haan, Margriet C. ;
Stoop, Esther M. ;
Bossuyt, Patrick M. ;
Thomeer, Maarten ;
van Leerdam, Monique E. ;
Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise ;
Fockens, Paul ;
Kuipers, Ernst J. ;
Stoker, Jaap ;
Dekker, Evelien .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 107 (12) :1777-1783
[4]  
Diabetes foreningen [The diabetes association], NAT DIAB
[5]   Effect of screening in the Nordic cancer control up to the year 2017 [J].
Hakama, M ;
Hristova, L .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1997, 36 (02) :119-128
[6]   Participation bias in a randomised trial of screening for lung cancer [J].
Hestbech, Mie Sara ;
Siersma, Volkert ;
Dirksen, Asger ;
Pedersen, Jesper H. ;
Brodersen, John .
LUNG CANCER, 2011, 73 (03) :325-331
[7]   Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult [J].
Hewitson, P. ;
Glasziou, P. ;
Irwig, L. ;
Towler, B. ;
Watson, E. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2007, (01)
[8]   Analysis of Barriers to and Patients' Preferences for CT Colonography for Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Nonadherent Urban Population [J].
Ho, Wendy ;
Broughton, Darcy E. ;
Donelan, Karen ;
Gazelle, G. Scott ;
Hur, Chin .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 195 (02) :393-397
[9]   Flexible sigmoidoscopy versus faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals [J].
Holme, Oyvind ;
Bretthauer, Michael ;
Fretheim, Atle ;
Odgaard-Jensen, Jan ;
Hoff, Geir .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (09)
[10]  
Kvale S, 2009, Interview: introduktion til et handvaerk