Short-Term (<8 wk) High-Intensity Interval Training in Diseased Cohorts

被引:26
作者
Blackwell, James E. M. [1 ,2 ]
Doleman, Brett [1 ,2 ]
Herrod, Philip J. J. [1 ,2 ]
Ricketts, Samuel [1 ]
Phillips, Bethan E. [1 ]
Lund, Jonathan N. [1 ,2 ]
Williams, John P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham, England
[2] Royal Derby Hosp, Derby, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
HIIT; (V) over dotO(2peak); ANAEROBIC THRESHOLD; CLINICAL; SHORT TERM; CORONARY-ARTERY-DISEASE; VOLUME SPRINT INTERVAL; HEART-FAILURE; CARDIORESPIRATORY FITNESS; CARDIAC REHABILITATION; ENDOTHELIAL FUNCTION; SURGICAL RESECTION; CANCER SURVIVORS; SKELETAL-MUSCLE; EXERCISE;
D O I
10.1249/MSS.0000000000001634
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Background and Aim Exercise training regimes can lead to improvements in measures of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), improved general health, and reduced morbidity and overall mortality risk. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) offers a time-efficient approach to improve CRF in healthy individuals, but the relative benefits of HIIT compared with traditional training methods are unknown in across different disease cohorts. Methods This systematic review and meta-analysis compares CRF gains in randomized controlled trials of short-term (<8 wk) HIIT versus either no exercise control (CON) or moderate continuous training (MCT) within diseased cohorts. Literature searches of the following databases were performed: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, and PubMed (all from inception to December 1, 2017), with further searches of Clinicaltrials.gov and citations via Google Scholar. Primary outcomes were effect on CRF variables: (V) over dotO(2peak) and anaerobic threshold. Results Thirty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. HIIT resulted in a clinically significant increase in VO2peak compared with CON (mean difference [MD] = 3.32 mLkg(-1)min(-1), 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.56-2.08). Overall HIIT provided added benefit to (V) over dotO(2peak) over MCT (MD = 0.79 mLkg(-1)min(-1), 95% CI = 0.20-1.39). The benefit of HIIT was most marked in patients with cardiovascular disease when compared with MCT ((V) over dotO(2peak): MD = 1.66 mLkg(-1)min(-1), 95% CI = 0.60-2.73; anaerobic threshold: MD = 1.61 mLkg(-1)min(-1), 95% CI = 0.33-2.90). Conclusions HIIT elicits improvements in objective measures of CRF within 8 wk in diseased cohorts compared with no intervention. When compared with MCT, HIIT imparts statistically significant additional improvements in measures of CRF, with clinically important additional improvements in (V) over dotO(2peak) in cardiovascular patients. Comparative efficacy of HIIT versus MCT combined with an often reduced time commitment may warrant HIIT's promotion as a viable clinical exercise intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:1740 / 1749
页数:10
相关论文
共 82 条
  • [81] Surgical resection of primary tumour improves aerobic performance in colorectal cancer
    Williams, J. P.
    Nyasavajjala, S. M.
    Phillips, B. E.
    Chakrabarty, M.
    Lund, J. N.
    [J]. EJSO, 2014, 40 (02): : 220 - 226
  • [82] Superior cardiovascular effect of aerobic interval training versus moderate continuous training in heart failure patients - A randomized study
    Wisloff, Ulrik
    Stoylen, Asbjorn
    Loennechen, Jan P.
    Bruvold, Morten
    Rognmo, Oivind
    Haram, Per Magnus
    Tjonna, Arnt Erik
    Helgerud, Jan
    Slordahl, Stig A.
    Lee, Sang Jun
    Videm, Vibeke
    Bye, Anja
    Smith, Godfrey L.
    Najjar, Sonia M.
    Ellingsen, Oyvind
    Skjaerpe, Terje
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2007, 115 (24) : 3086 - 3094