Impact of biplane versus single-plane imaging on radiation dose, contrast load and procedural time in coronary angioplasty

被引:33
作者
Sadick, V. [1 ,2 ]
Reed, W.
Collins, L.
Sadick, N. [3 ]
Heard, R. [4 ]
Robinson, J.
机构
[1] Westmead Hosp, Dept Radiol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Discipline Med Radiat Sci, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Westmead Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Discipline Behav & Social Sci Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
INDUCED NEPHROPATHY; INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY; CARDIAC-CATHETERIZATION; AMORPHOUS-SILICON; PATIENT; EXPOSURE; RISK; AREA; RECOMMENDATIONS; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1259/bjr/21696839
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Coronary angioplasties can be performed with either single-plane or biplane imaging techniques. The aim of this study was to determine whether biplane imaging, in comparison to single-plane imaging, reduces radiation dose and contrast load and shortens procedural time during (i) primary and elective coronary angioplasty procedures, (ii) angioplasty to the main vascular territories and (iii) procedures performed by operators with various levels of experience. This prospective observational study included a total of 504 primary and elective single-vessel coronary angioplasty procedures utilising either biplane or single-plane imaging. Radiographic and clinical parameters were collected from clinical reports and examination protocols. Radiation dose was measured by a dose-area-product (DAP) meter intrinsic to the angiography system. Our results showed that biplane imaging delivered a significantly greater radiation dose (181.4+/-121.0 Gycm(2)) than single-plane imaging (133.6+/-92.8 Gycm(2), p < 0.0001). The difference was independent of case type (primary or elective) (p=0.862), vascular territory (p=0.519) and operator experience (p=0.903). No significant difference was found in contrast load between biplane (166.8+/-62.9 ml) and single-plane imaging (176.8+/-66.0 ml) (p=0.302). This non-significant difference was independent of case type (p=0.551), vascular territory (p=0.308) and operator experience (p=0.304). Procedures performed with biplane imaging were significantly longer (55.3+/-27.8 min) than those with single-plane (48.9+/-24.2 min, p=0.010) and, similarly, were not dependent on case type (p=0.226), vascular territory (p=0.642) or operator experience (p=0.094). Biplane imaging resulted in a greater radiation dose and a longer procedural time and delivered a non-significant reduction in contrast load than single-plane imaging. These findings did not support the commonly perceived advantages of using biplane imaging in single-vessel coronary interventional procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 393
页数:15
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Prevention and Treatment of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy
    Al-Ghonaim, Mohammed
    Pannu, Neesh
    [J]. TECHNIQUES IN VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2006, 9 (02) : 42 - 49
  • [2] *AM ASS PHYS MED, 2001N70 AAPM
  • [3] Does cardiologist- or radiographer-operated fluoroscopy and image acquisition influence optimization of patient radiation exposure during routine coronary angiography?
    Arthur, WR
    Dhawan, J
    Norell, MS
    Hunter, AJ
    Clark, AL
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2002, 75 (897) : 748 - 753
  • [4] BAIM DS, 2006, GROSSMANS CARDIAC CA, P128
  • [5] Impact of nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention and a method for risk stratification
    Bartholomew, BA
    Harjai, KJ
    Dukkipati, S
    Boura, JA
    Yerkey, MW
    Glazier, S
    Grines, CL
    O'Neill, WW
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 93 (12) : 1515 - 1519
  • [6] American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions clinical expert consensus document on Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory standards - A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents
    Bashore, TM
    Bates, ER
    Berger, PB
    Clark, DA
    Cusma, JT
    Dehmer, GJ
    Kern, MJ
    Laskey, WK
    O'Laughlin, MP
    Oesterle, S
    Popma, JJ
    O'Rourke, RA
    Abrams, J
    Bates, ER
    Brodie, BR
    Douglas, PS
    Gregoratos, G
    Hlatky, MA
    Hochman, JS
    Kaul, S
    Tracy, CM
    Waters, DD
    Winters, WL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 37 (08) : 2170 - 2214
  • [7] Morbidity, mortality and economic burden of renal impairment in cardiac intensive care
    Chew, DP
    Astley, C
    Molloy, D
    Vaile, J
    De Pasquale, CG
    Aylward, P
    [J]. INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2006, 36 (03) : 185 - 192
  • [8] Calibration frequency of dose-area product meters
    Crawley, MT
    Mutch, S
    Nyekiova, M
    Reddy, C
    Weatherburn, H
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2001, 74 (879) : 259 - 261
  • [9] The dependence of patient dose on factors relating to the technique and complexity of Interventional Cardiology procedures
    Delichas, Miltiadis G.
    Psarrakos, Kyriakos
    Hatziioannou, Konstantinos
    Giannoglou, Georgios
    Molyvda-Athanasopoulou, Elisabeth
    Papanastassiou, Emmanouil
    Sioundas, Anastasios
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 21 (04): : 153 - 157
  • [10] Patient dosimetry during coronary interventions: A comprehensive analysis
    Efstathopoulos, EP
    Karvouni, E
    Kottou, S
    Tzanalaridou, E
    Korovesis, S
    Giazitzoglou, E
    Katritsis, DG
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2004, 147 (03) : 468 - 475