Eco-efficiency, eco-technology innovation and eco-well-being performance to improve global sustainable development

被引:97
作者
Zhang, Yu [1 ]
Mao, Yanying [2 ]
Jiao, Liudan [1 ]
Shuai, Chenyang [3 ]
Zhang, Heshan [4 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Coll Elect Engn, Dept Commun Engn, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Environm & Sustainabil, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Chongqing Jiaotong Univ, Coll Traff & Transportat, Chongqing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Eco-efficiency; Eco-technology innovation; Eco-well-being performance; Sustainable development; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFICIENCY; ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT; INDUSTRIAL SECTORS; SUPER-EFFICIENCY; CHINA; PERSPECTIVE; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106580
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In today's world, determining how to improve the quality of the economy, technology innovation and human well-being within resource and environmental limits is a global sustainable development goal. Thus, research on eco-efficiency (EE), eco-technology innovation (ETI) and eco-well-being performance (EWP) has great significance for improving the efficiency of converting ecological consumption into economic benefits, technological innovation and human well-being. This paper presents a two-stage Super-slack-based measure (SBM) model to examine the EE, ETI and EWP (3E) of 102 countries. The indicator system for the 3E network process is constructed by using inputs, intermediate products and outputs. The empirical results show that the highest 3E performers are Singapore, the United States and Iceland. The results also indicate that countries with high levels of economic development have much better EE, ETI and EWP levels than low-income countries. After comparing the values of the 3E in different countries with the global average, the results further show that overall global 3E performance is relatively low. These findings provide significant references to help governments generate different strategies for improving national 3E performance.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [21] IEA, 2017, DAT STAT INT EN AG
  • [22] Energy consumption, human well-being and economic development in central and eastern European nations: A cautionary tale of sustainability
    Jorgenson, Andrew K.
    Alekseyko, Alina
    Giedraitis, Vincentas
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 66 : 419 - 427
  • [23] [龙亮军 Long Liangjun], 2017, [自然资源学报, Journal of Natural Resources], V32, P595
  • [24] The comparison analysis of total factor productivity and eco-efficiency in China's cement manufactures
    Long, Xingle
    Zhao, Xicang
    Cheng, Faxin
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 81 : 61 - 66
  • [25] Technical, environmental and eco-efficiency measurement for supplier selection: An extension and application of data envelopment analysis
    Mahdiloo, Mahdi
    Saen, Reza Farzipoor
    Lee, Ki-Hoon
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2015, 168 : 279 - 289
  • [26] Mavi R.K., 2016, EVALUATING ECOINNOVA
  • [27] Joint analysis of eco-efficiency and eco-innovation with common weights in two-stage network DEA: A big data approach
    Mavi, Reza Kiani
    Saen, Reza Farzipoor
    Goh, Mark
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 144 : 553 - 562
  • [28] Political polarization on support for government spending on environmental protection in the USA, 1974-2012
    McCright, Aaron M.
    Xiao, Chenyang
    Dunlap, Riley E.
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2014, 48 : 251 - 260
  • [29] Montalvo Corral C., 2011, POTENTIAL ECOINNOVAT
  • [30] Waste Management in Germany - Development to a Sustainable Circular Economy?
    Nelles, M.
    Gruenes, J.
    Morscheck, G.
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT FOR RESOURCE UTILISATION, 2016, 35 : 6 - 14