Eco-efficiency, eco-technology innovation and eco-well-being performance to improve global sustainable development

被引:97
作者
Zhang, Yu [1 ]
Mao, Yanying [2 ]
Jiao, Liudan [1 ]
Shuai, Chenyang [3 ]
Zhang, Heshan [4 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Coll Elect Engn, Dept Commun Engn, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Environm & Sustainabil, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Chongqing Jiaotong Univ, Coll Traff & Transportat, Chongqing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Eco-efficiency; Eco-technology innovation; Eco-well-being performance; Sustainable development; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFICIENCY; ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT; INDUSTRIAL SECTORS; SUPER-EFFICIENCY; CHINA; PERSPECTIVE; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106580
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In today's world, determining how to improve the quality of the economy, technology innovation and human well-being within resource and environmental limits is a global sustainable development goal. Thus, research on eco-efficiency (EE), eco-technology innovation (ETI) and eco-well-being performance (EWP) has great significance for improving the efficiency of converting ecological consumption into economic benefits, technological innovation and human well-being. This paper presents a two-stage Super-slack-based measure (SBM) model to examine the EE, ETI and EWP (3E) of 102 countries. The indicator system for the 3E network process is constructed by using inputs, intermediate products and outputs. The empirical results show that the highest 3E performers are Singapore, the United States and Iceland. The results also indicate that countries with high levels of economic development have much better EE, ETI and EWP levels than low-income countries. After comparing the values of the 3E in different countries with the global average, the results further show that overall global 3E performance is relatively low. These findings provide significant references to help governments generate different strategies for improving national 3E performance.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2020, WORLD HAPPINESS REPO
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, HUMAN DEV REPORT 201
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2018, HUMAN DEV REPORTS
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2008, ECOINNOVATION
  • [5] Have cities effectively improved ecological well-being performance? Empirical analysis of 278 Chinese cities
    Bian, Jing
    Zhang, Yu
    Shuai, Chenyang
    Shen, Liyin
    Ren, Hong
    Wang, Yuanping
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 245
  • [6] Eco-Efficiency and Convergence in OECD Countries
    Camarero, Mariam
    Castillo, Juana
    Picazo-Tadeo, Andres J.
    Tamarit, Cecilio
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2013, 55 (01) : 87 - 106
  • [7] Evaluating the economic and environmental efficiency of ports: Evidence from Italy
    Castellano, Rosalia
    Ferretti, Marco
    Musella, Gaetano
    Risitano, Marcello
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 271
  • [8] Renewable energy technologies for sustainable development of energy efficient building
    Chel, Arvind
    Kaushik, Geetanjali
    [J]. ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2018, 57 (02) : 655 - 669
  • [9] The effect of production structure on the total CO2 emissions intensity in the Chinese construction industry
    Chen, Jindao
    Shen, Liyin
    Shi, Qian
    Hong, Jingke
    Ochoa, J. Jorge
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 213 : 1087 - 1095
  • [10] What makes the difference in construction carbon emissions between China and USA?
    Chen, Jindao
    Shi, Qian
    Shen, Liyin
    Huang, Yao
    Wu, Ya
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2019, 44 : 604 - 613