Regulation, free-riding incentives, and investment in R&D with spillovers

被引:19
作者
Strandholm, John C. [1 ]
Espinola-Arredondo, Ana [2 ,3 ]
Munoz-Garcia, Felix [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Carolina Upstate, George Dean Johnson Jr Coll Business & Econ, Spartanburg, SC 29306 USA
[2] Washington State Univ, Sch Econ Sci, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[3] Washington State Univ, 111C Hulbert Hall, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[4] Washington State Univ, 103G Hulbert Hall, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
关键词
Research and Development; Uniform fee; Type-dependent fee; Spillover; EXTERNALITIES; TAXATION; TAXES;
D O I
10.1016/j.reseneeco.2018.04.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper, we analyze a duopoly market with investment in abatement technology under environmental regulation. We use a three-stage game where firms invest in a green technology with spillover effects in the first stage, the regulator sets the emission fee in the second stage, and production of the polluting good occurs in the third stage. We analyze two different regulatory regimes: (1) each firm faces the same emission fee (uniform fee), and (2) each firm faces an emission fee dependent on the investment in green technology (type-dependent fee). Firms can differ through their costs of investing in the abatement technology (asymmetric efficiency). We obtain that social welfare is unambiguously higher under the type-dependent regime than otherwise. In addition, we find that the asymmetry in efficiency of investment affects firms' profits, identifying that efficient (inefficient) firms favor type-dependent (uniform) policy regimes. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 146
页数:14
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Firm Preferences for Environmental Policy: Industry Uniform or Firm Specific? [J].
Akhundjanov, Sherzod B. ;
Munoz-Garcia, Felix .
STRATEGIC BEHAVIOR AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 6 (1-2) :135-180
[2]   The exploration of technological diversity and the geographic localization of innovation [J].
Almeida, P ;
Kogut, B .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 1997, 9 (01) :21-31
[3]   Modelling imperfectly appropriable R&D via spillovers [J].
Amir, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2000, 18 (07) :1013-1032
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, AM EC REV
[5]  
Cameron G., 1998, Innovation and Growth: A Survey of the Empirical Evidence
[6]   R&D: A small contribution to productivity growth [J].
Comin, D .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2004, 9 (04) :391-421
[7]   Energy tax and competition in energy efficiency: The case of consumer durables [J].
Conrad, K .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2000, 15 (02) :159-177
[8]   Pollution taxes and pollution abatement in an oligopoly supergame [J].
Damania, D .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1996, 30 (03) :323-336
[9]  
DASPREMONT C, 1988, AM ECON REV, V78, P1133
[10]   Pollution-reducing innovations under taxes or permits [J].
Denicolò, V .
OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 1999, 51 (01) :184-199