Applicability and performance of some similarity metrics for automated image registration

被引:0
作者
Suri, Sahil [1 ]
Arora, Manoj K. [1 ]
Seiler, Ralf [1 ]
Csaplovics, Elmar [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Roorkee 247667, Uttar Pradesh, India
来源
MULTISPECTRAL, HYPERSPECTRAL, AND ULTRASPECTRAL REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY, TECHNIQUES, AND APPLICATIONS | 2006年 / 6405卷
关键词
image registration; mutual information; cluster reward algorithm; genetic algorithm; simplex algorithm;
D O I
10.1117/12.693954
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
Image registration is a key to many image processing tasks such as image fusion, image change detection, GIS overlay operations, 3D visualization etc. The task of image registration needs to become efficient and automatic to process enormous amount of remote sensing data. A number of feature and intensity based image registration techniques are in vogue. The aim of this study is to evaluate the applicability and performance of the two intensity based similarity metrics, namely mutual information and cluster reward algorithm. Image registration task has been mapped as an optimization problem. A combination of a global optimizer namely Genetic algorithm and a local optimizer namely Nelder Mead Simplex algorithm have been successfully used to search registration parameters from the coarsest to the finest level of the image pyramid formed using wavelet transformation. For sound investigations, registration of remote sensing images acquired with varied spatial, spectral characteristics from the ASTER sensor have been considered. The image registration experiments suggest that both the similarity metrics have the capability of successfully registering the images with high accuracy and efficiency. In general, mutual information has yielded more accurate results than cluster reward algorithm.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, International Journal of Networking and Information Systems, Special Issue on Video Data
[2]   A SURVEY OF IMAGE REGISTRATION TECHNIQUES [J].
BROWN, LG .
COMPUTING SURVEYS, 1992, 24 (04) :325-376
[3]  
Chalermwat P., 1999, Parallel and Distributed Processing. 11th IPPS/SPDP'99 Workshops Held in Conjunction with the 13th International Parallel Processing Symposium and 10th Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing. Proceedings, P257
[4]   Change detection with ALI and Landsat satellite data [J].
Chen, H ;
Goodenough, DG ;
Dyk, A ;
McDonald, S ;
Han, T .
ANALYSIS OF MULTI-TEMPORAL REMOTE SENSING IMAGES, 2004, 3 :89-97
[5]   Performance of mutual information similarity measure for registration of multitemporal remote sensing images [J].
Chen, HM ;
Varshney, PK ;
Arora, MK .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2003, 41 (11) :2445-2454
[6]  
INGLADA J, IGARSS 02, P104
[7]   Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information [J].
Maes, F ;
Collignon, A ;
Vandermeulen, D ;
Marchal, G ;
Suetens, P .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1997, 16 (02) :187-198
[8]   Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: A survey [J].
Pluim, JPW ;
Maintz, JBA ;
Viergever, MA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2003, 22 (08) :986-1004
[9]   An FFT-based technique for translation, rotation, and scale-invariant image registration [J].
Reddy, BS ;
Chatterji, BN .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 1996, 5 (08) :1266-1271
[10]   Image registration methods:: a survey [J].
Zitová, B ;
Flusser, J .
IMAGE AND VISION COMPUTING, 2003, 21 (11) :977-1000