Using a co-innovation approach to support innovation and learning: Cross-cutting observations from different settings and emergent issues

被引:36
作者
Botha, Neels [1 ]
Turner, James A. [1 ]
Fielke, Simon [1 ]
Klerkx, Laurens [2 ]
机构
[1] AgResearch Ltd, Hamilton, New Zealand
[2] Wageningen Univ, Knowledge Technol & Innovat Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Agricultural innovation; transdisciplinary research; transformative research; reflexive monitoring; evaluation; TRANSDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; AGRICULTURAL INNOVATION; TRANSLATION; REFLECTION; FRAMEWORK; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1177/0030727017707403
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Co-innovation has gained interest in recent years as an approach to tackle issues in agriculture and natural resource management. Co-innovation requires new roles for researchers supporting these processes and enabling settings in the programs they work in and the organizations they pertain to. The contributions to this special issue explore experiences with co-innovation in different settings from different angles. The special issue presents several studies on co-innovation in a large program in New Zealand, a study based on an EU Horizon 2020 project in the Czech Republic, The Netherlands, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom as well as co-innovation experiences from Uruguay and Tanzania. Cross-cutting findings and emergent issues include (i) the need to consider the issue of simultaneously scaling both co-innovation project results and the co-innovation practice, (ii) the issue of flexibility in pace of co-innovation to allow different participants to converge and the flexibility in learning space needed to enable reflection, (iii) the issue of changing the dominant logics of the innovation systems in which co-innovation is embedded and (iv) the need for reflexive monitoring to support processes of co-innovation and their institutional embedding.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 91
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
[11]   From transfer to translation: Using systemic understandings of technology to understand drip irrigation uptake [J].
Garb, Yaakov ;
Friedlander, Lonia .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2014, 128 :13-24
[12]   Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective [J].
Geels, Frank W. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2010, 39 (04) :495-510
[13]   Structural innovations: towards a unified perspective? [J].
Howells, Jeremy ;
Edler, Jakob .
SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2011, 38 (02) :157-167
[14]   Replication and translation of co-innovation: The influence of institutional context in large international participatory research projects [J].
Klerkx, Laurens ;
Seuneke, Pieter ;
de Wolf, Pieter ;
Rossing, Walter A. H. .
LAND USE POLICY, 2017, 61 :276-292
[15]   Achievements and challenges of innovation co-production support initiatives in the Australian and Dutch dairy sectors: A comparative study [J].
Klerkx, Laurens ;
Nettle, Ruth .
FOOD POLICY, 2013, 40 :74-89
[16]   Integrated agricultural landscape management: Case study on inclusive innovation processes, monitoring and evaluation in the Mbeya Region, Tanzania [J].
Malley, Zacharia J. ;
Hart, Abigail ;
Buck, Louise ;
Mwambene, Pius L. ;
Katambara, Zacharia ;
Mng'ong'o, Marco ;
Chambi, Consolatha .
OUTLOOK ON AGRICULTURE, 2017, 46 (02) :146-153
[17]  
Nederlof S., 2011, Putting Heads together. Agricultural Innovation Platforms in Practice
[18]   Stakeholder participation in agricultural research projects: a conceptual framework for reflection and decision-making [J].
Neef, Andreas ;
Neubert, Dieter .
AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES, 2011, 28 (02) :179-194
[19]   How Programme Teams Progress Agricultural Innovation in the Australian Dairy Industry [J].
Nettle, Ruth ;
Brightling, Pauline ;
Hope, Anne .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION & EXTENSION, 2013, 19 (03) :271-290
[20]   Exploring ways to reconcile accountability and learning in the evaluation of niche experiments [J].
Regeer, Barbara J. ;
de Wildt-Liesveld, Renee ;
van Mierlo, Barbara ;
Bunders, Joske F. G. .
EVALUATION, 2016, 22 (01) :6-28