Guidelines, compliance, and effectiveness: a 12 months' audit in an acute district general healthcare trust on the two week rule for suspected colorectal cancer

被引:46
作者
Debnath, D
Dielehner, N
Gunning, KA
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Dept Surg, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland
[2] S Durham Hlth Care Trust, Darlington Mem Hosp, Dept Surg, Darlington, Durham, England
关键词
D O I
10.1136/pmj.78.926.748
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: The Department of Health had recently introduced guidelines so that all suspected colorectal cancer patients could be seen by a specialist within two weeks of referral by their general practitioners. The usefulness and practicality of such a decision had been questioned. The aims of this study were to measure the compliance to the guidelines and evaluate the effectiveness of such referrals. Methods: All patients who were referred to the rapid access colorectal clinic between August 2000 and July 2001 were included. Settings: Darlington Memorial Hospital and Bishop Auckland General Hospital, both under South Durham Health Care Trust, were considered for the study. Measures: Date of referral, referring practitioner, time of appointment, reasons for referral, and diagnosis. Results: A total of 239 referrals were made; 96.2% of patients were given appointments within two weeks. Rectal bleed was the commonest (32%) cause for referral. Diverticular disease was the most frequent (29%) condition diagnosed. Altogether 97.4% of referrals were incomplete and 37.6% did not comply with the guidelines. Twenty one colorectal cancers (8.9%) were diagnosed. The early cancer detection rate was 4.6%. Conclusions: This audit showed that compliance to the guidelines was associated with a higher cancer detection rate. The majority of patients received appointments within two weeks. Contrary to some speculations, the number of referrals was not limitless. However a high number of referrals failed to adhere to the guidelines. The cancer (particularly early cancer) detection rate was disappointingly low. This does not reflect an efficient system of referral and potential benefits to patients remain questionable.
引用
收藏
页码:748 / 751
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2000, REF GUID SUSP CANC
  • [2] Referral guidelines for colorectal cancer: a threat or a challenge?
    Baig, MK
    Marks, CG
    [J]. HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2000, 61 (07): : 452 - 453
  • [3] BAIG MK, 2001, BMJ ONLINE 0116
  • [4] Baker R, 2001, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V51, P7
  • [5] *COL SIT SPEC GROU, CANC CAR ALL TEES S
  • [6] Davies E, 2000, BRIT MED J, V320, P1476
  • [7] *DEP HLTH, 2001, CANC WAIT TIM MON 2
  • [8] *DEP HLTH, 2002, CANC WAIT TIM GUID M
  • [9] HEMINGWAY D, 2001, BMJ ONLINE 0115
  • [10] Hodder R, 2002, ANN ROY COLL SURG, V84, P282