Use of a continuous-flow device in patients awaiting heart transplantation

被引:1294
作者
Miller, Leslie W.
Pagani, Francis D.
Russell, Stuart D.
John, Ranjit
Boyle, Andrew J.
Aaronson, Keith D.
Conte, John V.
Naka, Yoshifumi
Mancini, Donna
Delgado, Reynolds M.
MacGillivray, Thomas E.
Farrar, David J.
Frazier, O. H.
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[4] Columbia Univ, New York, NY USA
[5] Texas Heart Inst, Houston, TX 77025 USA
[6] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[7] Thoratec, Pleasanton, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa067758
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The use of left ventricular assist devices is an accepted therapy for patients with refractory heart failure, but current pulsatile volume-displacement devices have limitations (including large pump size and limited long-term mechanical durability) that have reduced widespread adoption of this technology. Continuous-flow pumps are newer types of left ventricular assist devices developed to overcome some of these limitations. Methods: In a prospective, multicenter study without a concurrent control group, 133 patients with end-stage heart failure who were on a waiting list for heart transplantation underwent implantation of a continuous-flow pump. The principal outcomes were the proportions of patients who, at 180 days, had undergone transplantation, had cardiac recovery, or had ongoing mechanical support while remaining eligible for transplantation. We also assessed functional status and quality of life. Results: The principal outcomes occurred in 100 patients (75%). The median duration of support was 126 days (range, 1 to 600). The survival rate during support was 75% at 6 months and 68% at 12 months. At 3 months, therapy was associated with significant improvement in functional status (according to the New York Heart Association class and results of a 6-minute walk test) and in quality of life (according to the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy questionnaires). Major adverse events included postoperative bleeding, stroke, right heart failure, and percutaneous lead infection. Pump thrombosis occurred in two patients. Conclusions: A continuous-flow left ventricular assist device can provide effective hemodynamic support for a period of at least 6 months in patients awaiting heart transplantation, with improved functional status and quality of life. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00121472.) N Engl J Med 2007;357:885-96.
引用
收藏
页码:885 / 896
页数:12
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Executive Summary for the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group on Next Generation Ventricular Assist Devices for Destination Therapy
    Baldwin, J. Timothy
    Robbins, Robert C.
    [J]. SEMINARS IN THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 17 (04) : 369 - 371
  • [2] Mechanical circulatory support device database of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Third Annual Report - 2005
    Deng, MC
    Edwards, LB
    Hertz, MI
    Rowe, AW
    Keck, BM
    Kormos, R
    Naftel, DC
    Kirklin, JK
    Taylor, DO
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 24 (09) : 1182 - 1187
  • [3] First clinical implant of the VentrAssist left ventricular assist system as destination therapy for end-stage heart failure
    Esmore, DS
    Kaye, D
    Salamonsen, R
    Buckland, M
    Rowland, M
    Negri, J
    Rowley, Y
    Woodard, J
    Begg, JR
    Ayre, P
    Rosenfeldt, FL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 24 (08) : 1150 - 1154
  • [4] Preoperative and postoperative comparison of patients with univentricular and biventricular support with the Thoratec ventricular assist device as a bridge to cardiac transplantation
    Farrar, DJ
    Hill, JD
    Pennington, DG
    McBride, LR
    Holman, WL
    Kormos, RL
    Esmore, D
    Gray, LA
    Seifert, PE
    Schoettle, GP
    Moore, CH
    Hendry, PJ
    Bhayana, JN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1997, 113 (01) : 202 - 209
  • [5] Clinical experience with an implantable, intracardiac, continuous flow circulatory support device: Physiologic implications and their relationship to patient selection
    Frazier, OH
    Myers, TJ
    Westaby, S
    Gregoric, ID
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2004, 77 (01) : 133 - 141
  • [6] Multicenter clinical evaluation of the HeartMate vented electric left ventricular assist system in patients awaiting heart transplantation
    Frazier, OH
    Rose, EA
    Oz, MC
    Dembitsky, W
    McCarthy, P
    Radovancevic, B
    Poirier, VL
    Dasse, KA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 122 (06) : 1186 - 1195
  • [7] IMPROVED MORTALITY AND REHABILITATION OF TRANSPLANT CANDIDATES TREATED WITH A LONG-TERM IMPLANTABLE LEFT-VENTRICULAR ASSIST SYSTEM
    FRAZIER, OH
    ROSE, EA
    MCCARTHY, P
    BURTON, NA
    TECTOR, A
    LEVIN, H
    KAYNE, HL
    POIRIER, VL
    DASSE, KA
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1995, 222 (03) : 327 - 338
  • [8] FRAZIER OH, 2006, ISHLT MONOGRAPH SER, V1
  • [9] GOLDSTEIN D, 2006, ISHLT MONOGRAPH SERI, V1, P77
  • [10] Worldwide experience with the MicroMed DeBakey ventricular assist device® as a bridge to transplantation
    Goldstein, DJ
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (10) : 272 - 277