Technological advances for improving adenoma detection rates: The changing face of colonoscopy

被引:20
作者
Ishaq, Sauid [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Siau, Keith [1 ]
Harrison, Elizabeth [1 ]
Tontini, Gian Eugenio [4 ]
Hoffman, Arthur [5 ]
Gross, Seth [6 ]
Kiesslich, Ralf [5 ]
Neumann, Helmut [7 ]
机构
[1] Dudley Grp Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Pensnett Rd, Dudley DY1 2HQ, England
[2] Birmingham City Univ, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] St Georges Univ, True Blue, Grenada
[4] IRCCS Policlin San Donato, Gastroenterol & Digest Endoscopy Unit, San Donato Milanese, Italy
[5] St Marienkrankenhaus Frankfurt, Dept Internal Med & Gastroenterol, Frankfurt, Germany
[6] NYU, Langone Med Ctr, Div Gastroenterol, New York, NY USA
[7] Univ Hosp Mainz, Intervent Endoscopy Ctr, Mainz, Germany
关键词
Adenoma detection; Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer screening; Polyp detection; CAP-ASSISTED COLONOSCOPY; HIGH-DEFINITION COLONOSCOPY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; COLORECTAL-CANCER; NARROW-BAND; WHITE-LIGHT; STANDARD COLONOSCOPY; BALLOON COLONOSCOPE; POLYP DETECTION; MISS RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.dld.2017.03.030
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Worldwide, colorectal cancer is the third commonest cancer. Over 90% follow an adenoma-to-cancer sequence over many years. Colonoscopy is the gold standard method for cancer screening and early adenoma detection. However, considerable variation exists between endoscopists' detection rates. This review considers the effects of different endoscopic techniques on adenoma detection. Two areas of technological interest were considered: (1) optical technologies and (2) mechanical technologies. Optical solutions, including FICE, NBI, i-SCAN and high definition colonoscopy showed mixed results. In contrast, mechanical advances, such as cap-assisted colonoscopy, FUSE, EndoCuff and G-EYETM, showed promise, with reported detections rates of up to 69%. However, before definitive recommendations can be made for their incorporation into daily practice, further studies and comparison trials are required. (C) 2017 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:721 / 727
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Adenoma detection with Endocuff colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy: a multicentre randomised controlled trial
    van Doorn, S. C.
    van der Vlugt, M.
    Depla, A. C. T. M.
    Wientjes, C. A.
    Mallant-Hent, R. C.
    Siersema, P. D.
    Tytgat, K. M. A. J.
    Tuynman, H.
    Kuiken, S. D.
    Houben, G. M. P.
    Stokkers, P. C. F.
    Moons, L. M. G.
    Bossuyt, P. M. M.
    Fockens, P.
    Mundt, M. W.
    Dekker, E.
    GUT, 2017, 66 (03) : 438 - 445
  • [22] New endoscopy advances to refine adenoma detection rate for colorectal cancer screening: None is the winner
    Maida, Marcello
    Camilleri, Salvatore
    Manganaro, Michele
    Garufi, Serena
    Scarpulla, Giuseppe
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 9 (10) : 402 - 406
  • [23] Advances in image enhancement in colonoscopy for detection of adenomas
    Matsuda, Takahisa
    Ono, Akiko
    Sekiguchi, Masau
    Fujii, Takahiro
    Saito, Yutaka
    NATURE REVIEWS GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 14 (05) : 305 - 314
  • [24] A simple method to improve adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: Altering patient position
    Koksal, Aydin Seref
    Kalkan, Ismail Hakki
    Torun, Serkan
    Taskiran, Ismail
    Oztas, Erkin
    Kayacetin, Ertugrul
    Sasmaz, Nurgul
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 27 (09): : 509 - 512
  • [25] Endoscopic innovations to increase the adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy
    Vincent K Dik
    Leon MG Moons
    Peter D Siersema
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2014, (09) : 2200 - 2211
  • [26] Colonoscopy Scheduling Influences Adenoma and Polyp Detection Rates
    Paeck, Kyung Hyun
    Heo, Woon Je
    Park, Dong Il
    Kim, Young-Ho
    Lee, Suck-Ho
    Lee, Chang Kyun
    Eun, Chang Soo
    Han, Dong Soo
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 60 (127) : 1647 - 1652
  • [27] The effect of colonoscopy preparation quality on adenoma detection rates
    Sherer, Eric A.
    Imler, Timothy D.
    Imperiale, Thomas F.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (03) : 545 - 553
  • [28] Effect of a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: the TERRACE study
    Leufkens, Anke M.
    DeMarco, Daniel C.
    Rastogi, Amit
    Akerman, Paul A.
    Azzouzi, Kassem
    Rothstein, Richard I.
    Vleggaar, Frank P.
    Repici, Alessandro
    Rando, Giacomo
    Okolo, Patrick I.
    Dewit, Olivier
    Ignjatovic, Ana
    Odstrcil, Elizabeth
    East, James
    Deprez, Pierre H.
    Saunders, Brian P.
    Kalloo, Anthony N.
    Creel, Bradley
    Singh, Vikas
    Lennon, Anne Marie
    Siersema, Peter D.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 73 (03) : 480 - 489
  • [29] Rates of Suboptimal Preparation for Colonoscopy Differ Markedly Between Providers Impact on Adenoma Detection Rates
    Mahadev, SriHari
    Green, Peter H. R.
    Lebwohl, Benjamin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 49 (09) : 746 - 750
  • [30] An overview of deep learning algorithms and water exchange in colonoscopy in improving adenoma detection
    Hsieh, Yu-Hsi
    Leung, Felix W.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 13 (12) : 1153 - 1160