Simplifying safety standards: Using work domain analysis to guide regulatory restructure

被引:2
作者
Carden, Tony [1 ]
Goode, Natassia [1 ]
Salmon, Paul M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sunshine Coast, Ctr Human Factors & Sociotech Syst, Sippy Downs, Qld, Australia
关键词
Work domain analysis; Regulation; Regulatory system evaluation; Safety standards; Systems thinking; SOCIOTECHNICAL SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105096
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This article describes a study in which a popular systems analysis method was used to inform the design of a safety standard. Specifically, Work Domain Analysis was used to analyze and reorganise the structure of a safety standard for organisations providing adventure activities in Australia. Work Domain Analysis allowed for the identification of system objects, processes, functions, measures, and purposes, revealing limitations in the capacity of the proposed structure to achieve the safety standard's intended purposes. Limitations included a high number of compliance requirements, a confusion between mandatory and optional requirements, a lack of educational support material, and no reliable means to measure system performance. The analysis was used to design an "ideal" structure for the safety standard. Key recommendations of the ideal structure were accepted for implementation, while others were not. The potential for future applications of Work Domain Analysis for regulatory system evaluation, reform, and design are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Adams D., 2013, ENG SAFETY
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, INVESTIGATION IND SE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, DEF DOM ERG
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, GAIA NEW LOOK LIFE E
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, MEASURING REGULATORY
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1998, COMPLEXITY POSTMODER
[7]  
Australian Government, 2014, CUTT RED TAP AUSTR G
[8]  
Better Regulation Task Force, 2004, AV REG CREEP
[9]  
Bisantz A.M., 2008, APPL COGNITIVE WORK
[10]  
Black J., 2007, Principles Based Regulation: Risks, Challenges and Opportunities